Randy put another £10m in during 2011/12 so he's now put £133m in as equity and £107m as loans which aren't repayable until at least the end of 2021.
Quote from: Ad@m on March 06, 2013, 02:01:13 PMRandy put another £10m in during 2011/12 so he's now put £133m in as equity and £107m as loans which aren't repayable until at least the end of 2021.On top of that, there's £30m owed to the parent undertaking that isn't in the form of loan notes. I assume this is just cash paid over to keep things going in the short run. It's in the creditors due in less than one year total. All of the loan notes are due in more than one year.
But surely if we are going to assess the financial performance of the club we can't consider our personal estimation of the owner's future behaviour as due diligence?
The fact that the debt appears in the accounts and that the owner decided to waive his interest payments does not mean that that debt is not a threat to the business's future, especially if its income falls and the interest swallows up an ever-increasing proportion of the club's income.
I don't think Lerner's motives are clear at all.He has put the club's status and future prospects in peril by pushing through his cuts over an unrealistic timetable.He has stuck to that plan through endless failure and gives the impression that his priorities are overwhelmingly financial.Any other interpretation is just denial and wishful-thinking.
We do not know what he thinks because he has never taken the trouble to actually tell us.The only thing we know is that he radically changed his mind and there is nothing to say he won't do the same in the future.
Quote from: Risso on March 06, 2013, 04:13:12 PMQuote from: Ad@m on March 06, 2013, 02:01:13 PMRandy put another £10m in during 2011/12 so he's now put £133m in as equity and £107m as loans which aren't repayable until at least the end of 2021.On top of that, there's £30m owed to the parent undertaking that isn't in the form of loan notes. I assume this is just cash paid over to keep things going in the short run. It's in the creditors due in less than one year total. All of the loan notes are due in more than one year.Fair enough - I was rushing my review over lunchtime!!
I don't know about you lot, but all this accounting talk has given me a right chubby on.
So to sum up these accounts we're pretty much buggered for the foreseeable future, unless we go down then we're really buggered.*checks Randy's 5 Year plan*
Quote from: Greg N'Ash on March 07, 2013, 01:04:09 AMSo to sum up these accounts we're pretty much buggered for the foreseeable future, unless we go down then we're really buggered.*checks Randy's 5 Year plan*at least we have our new pub...........
Quote from: itbrvilla on March 07, 2013, 01:57:49 AMQuote from: Greg N'Ash on March 07, 2013, 01:04:09 AMSo to sum up these accounts we're pretty much buggered for the foreseeable future, unless we go down then we're really buggered.*checks Randy's 5 Year plan*at least we have our new pub...........And we're carbon neutral. They didn't even mention that in the accounts.
Deary me, Villadroid - you don't half write some shite!Quote from: Villadroid on March 06, 2013, 02:49:59 PMBut surely if we are going to assess the financial performance of the club we can't consider our personal estimation of the owner's future behaviour as due diligence?It's not really a personal estimation. He sent a statement to all season ticket holders either the start of this season or last where he said he had ambitions for the club to be successful on the pitch whilst being self-financing off it.
So, I say that the accounts are interesting in terms of assessing the performance of the management but you'll get no better picture of the club's vision except their intent to offer their customers a lower grade of football product.The only thing we can tell is that the club is losing income, running at a loss and the customers are not happy.All signs of poor management and a failing business.
Quote from: Villadroid on March 07, 2013, 10:07:51 AMSo, I say that the accounts are interesting in terms of assessing the performance of the management but you'll get no better picture of the club's vision except their intent to offer their customers a lower grade of football product.The only thing we can tell is that the club is losing income, running at a loss and the customers are not happy.All signs of poor management and a failing business.Exactly right on all three points. Their first strategy in the "five year plan" was to achieve Champions League football, but they went about it entirely in the wrong way, giving virtyually all of the power at the club to one man.It's telling that as the losses started to rack up, that Krulak was on here and other places saying that the sending and losses were all expected and planned for.When it became clear that this was in fact not the case, they then went into panic mode, sold all of the saleable assets and basically stopped pretending that we could compete on an even keel with even mid-ranking clubs in the Premier League.