Quote from: pauliewalnuts on March 01, 2013, 07:25:37 PMQuote from: Ads on March 01, 2013, 05:36:47 PMWe should never be in profit. Why give to HMRC what you can give to the manager in the trasnfer window?I take it you're not being entirely serious.Doug's justification for spending £1.5 million on Cascarino. It would only have gone on tax.
Quote from: Ads on March 01, 2013, 05:36:47 PMWe should never be in profit. Why give to HMRC what you can give to the manager in the trasnfer window?I take it you're not being entirely serious.
We should never be in profit. Why give to HMRC what you can give to the manager in the trasnfer window?
Quote from: dave.woodhall on March 01, 2013, 07:34:07 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on March 01, 2013, 07:25:37 PMQuote from: Ads on March 01, 2013, 05:36:47 PMWe should never be in profit. Why give to HMRC what you can give to the manager in the trasnfer window?I take it you're not being entirely serious.Doug's justification for spending £1.5 million on Cascarino. It would only have gone on tax.With hindsight, i wish we'd just ponied up the tax.
@thegoalzone: Villa reveal that despite turnover reducing by 11. 6 million the club have reduced losses from 53.9 to 17.7 mil for year ending may 2012@thegoalzone: Villa a/cs also reveal attendance down from 37,220 to 33,873@thegoalzone: Villa owner Randy Learner waived intrest on loans to club of 107.1million creating one time benefit to club of 20.3 million pounds@thegoalzone: Villas Operating costs reduced from 158.7 million to 138.4 million@thegoalzone: Villa made 26.9 million pounds on player trading thats 8.1 million more than previous year
The amazing thing about Cascarino wasn't that we paid so much for him but that Celtic gave us most of it back.
When are the wage bill figures revealed and it's percentage to our turnover, is that in May figures?That's the one I'm most interested him seeing as it's the main issue for the last few years.
Is this going to be a 'Lerner is a twat for letting the manager spend' thread? We haven't had one of those for a good couple of months. 'Lerner is a twat for not backing the manager' threads are getting a bit monotonous.
The fall in income is troubling because it cannot be accounted for by a drop in attendances alone.It seems that the substantial increase in the size of the commercial department is not now earning its corn.Judging by the number of suits which attended the meeting where fans demanded blackboards for noughts and crosses and more Twix bars in the vending machines, Villa is encumbered with an ever-increasing number of managers, which can't be good.Especially as the trend these days for financial bods to claim they have done a bonus-worthy job even when they have made a loss.Did I read somewhere that Villa now employ 500 people or did I imagine it?