His first touch is sometimes a bit iffy, but he's been consistently good for a while now. I hope it continues and he continues to improve, we're finally seeing the sort of potential we thought we'd bought. He does need to add goals to his game though.
Yes when he broke through the middle i expected him to shoot but he hesitated on Monday and got caught
Quote from: eastie on May 01, 2013, 01:47:04 PMYes when he broke through the middle i expected him to shoot but he hesitated on Monday and got caughtFrustrating to see and something he needs to work on without doubt.
I think we're judging the current midfield'd scoring rate based on an old fashioned 442. In a 433 it's rare that they break past the forwards, so they're less likely to score.Whereas on other threads people have been saying they can't remember the last time we had three forwards get 10+ goals.Swings and roundabouts innit.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on May 01, 2013, 01:23:50 PMHis first touch is sometimes a bit iffy, but he's been consistently good for a while now. I hope it continues and he continues to improve, we're finally seeing the sort of potential we thought we'd bought. He does need to add goals to his game though.Yes when he broke through the middle i expected him to shoot but he hesitated on Monday and got caught - goals is one thing we do need to see from midfield.
He's also clearly got a sense of humour...http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22366447
Quote from: Mossie Hennebry on May 01, 2013, 03:55:39 PMHe's also clearly got a sense of humour...http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22366447WM supportive as ever, there.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on May 01, 2013, 06:00:54 PMQuote from: Mossie Hennebry on May 01, 2013, 03:55:39 PMHe's also clearly got a sense of humour...http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22366447WM supportive as ever, there.Does anyone know what they were negative about after the Sunderland game? I know they rolled out the old "why isn't Bent starting?" after the Fulham one.