collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by Beard82
[Today at 10:22:50 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Concrete Tom
[Today at 09:55:56 PM]


Matty Cash by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:34:47 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:32:42 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by Villan For Life
[Today at 09:32:31 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by cdbearsfan
[Today at 07:08:01 PM]


Golf 2025 by Gareth
[Today at 06:53:45 PM]


International Rugby by UK Redsox
[Today at 06:13:58 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Cricket Thread 2013  (Read 548808 times)

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 43167
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3150 on: August 10, 2013, 08:41:59 AM »
Tremlett needs to be back playing ready for the return trip in Aus. He will cause them all sorts of problems with his height down there.

Online KevinGage

  • Member
  • Posts: 14141
  • Location: Singing from under the floorboards
  • GM : 20.09.20
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3151 on: August 10, 2013, 10:04:31 AM »
In the short term, it might be worth tinkering with Trott swapping places with Root.   

Trott plays in near enough the same manner regardless of the game situation (and regardless of form).  It's frustrating, but that caution can be well suited to opening the batting.  And he's done it before for Warwickshire.  Root can play with caution too but -as we've seen- he can get bogged down and then that builds pressure.  Trott is by no means explosive, but he will look to score. 

For Root, when he starts defensively, it seems to be harder for him to get motoring.  Going in at three might give him more freedom. 

Ideally you'd want at least one opener who looks to take it to the opposition, but the candidates out there aren't a vast improvement in that regard. 

On the plus side, although the batters have been below par for most of the series so far, there does seem to be a degree of resillience there. That last morning at Old Trafford apart, they don't look like getting rolled for ridicuously low scores as per Australia's first innings at Lord's.   Get the score up to 260+ this morning and that might still be a competitive score on this wicket.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3152 on: August 10, 2013, 10:39:51 AM »
Well it's time for our team to turn up now, we've lost 6 consecutive days to Australia and we need to look at ourselves. That's the batsmen and the bowlers, we need to knock them over cheaply and then we need to actually put runs on the board.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3153 on: August 10, 2013, 10:52:18 AM »
I still don't think that pitch is a bad pitch and 100-1 shows that clearly, it was shocking batting and it's up to bowlers to save us.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3154 on: August 10, 2013, 10:52:52 AM »
Oh and a message to Cook, we have to attack them and not go on the defensive. That's how Australia got wickets and it's the only way we will.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3155 on: August 10, 2013, 11:09:47 AM »
All out, we've put on no runs. Time for the bowlers to turn up, because we've been piss poor for 6 days in a row.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3156 on: August 10, 2013, 11:11:23 AM »
Well we are out and about 150 short of a decent score on this wicket unless I've read it all wrong because it doesn't seem to be doing much.

Up to the bowlers again to get us into this.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3157 on: August 10, 2013, 11:25:35 AM »
Pitch it up Broad.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3158 on: August 10, 2013, 11:34:15 AM »
For fucks sake Broad, pitch it up.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37408
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3159 on: August 10, 2013, 11:35:20 AM »
All the noise is that whilst there's no sideways movement the ball isn't coming on to the bat regularly, which is same I've heard about this ground before, the pace taken out of the delivery on the bounce seems very inconsistent.

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7950
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3160 on: August 10, 2013, 11:35:36 AM »
Broad bowling like a moron at the moment. Obviously taking his lead from our batsmen

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3161 on: August 10, 2013, 11:36:07 AM »
There you go! Warner gone!

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7950
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3162 on: August 10, 2013, 11:36:11 AM »
Broad bowling like a moron at the moment. Obviously taking his lead from our batsmen

Knew that would work

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3163 on: August 10, 2013, 11:36:27 AM »
Keep it pitched up Broad.

Offline Andy Poole

  • Member
  • Posts: 2300
  • Location: Eastleigh, Hampshire
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #3164 on: August 10, 2013, 11:37:25 AM »
Broady!! Rocky has gone.

Hghest score batting first this year at Durham is 267. However Yorkshire posted 339 in a fourh innings to win.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal