collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by Beard82
[Today at 10:22:50 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Concrete Tom
[Today at 09:55:56 PM]


Matty Cash by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:34:47 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:32:42 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by Villan For Life
[Today at 09:32:31 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by cdbearsfan
[Today at 07:08:01 PM]


Golf 2025 by Gareth
[Today at 06:53:45 PM]


International Rugby by UK Redsox
[Today at 06:13:58 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Cricket Thread 2013  (Read 548825 times)

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7950
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2955 on: August 04, 2013, 04:20:30 PM »
Plus side is this is still a dream to bat

Offline Lsvilla

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2057
  • GM : 13.08.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2956 on: August 04, 2013, 04:20:50 PM »
This is really poor captaincy from Cook
What do you suggest then - 4 slips and 2 gully's ?

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7950
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2957 on: August 04, 2013, 04:22:03 PM »
Very odd wicket

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2958 on: August 04, 2013, 04:22:46 PM »
Good wickets for Jimmy's average this.

Offline DrGonzo

  • Member
  • Posts: 6179
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Over the border, under the hill, on the farm.
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2959 on: August 04, 2013, 04:22:59 PM »
You won't hear Jimmy complain.  Nor Cook, that's another 2 minutes we don't have to bat.

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7950
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2960 on: August 04, 2013, 04:23:41 PM »
This is really poor captaincy from Cook
What do you suggest then - 4 slips and 2 gully's ?

It's not just the field placings, its the lack of urgency in our fielding. They've been allowed to run too many 2's that shouldn't have been. I also think Swann's bowled largely poorly in this innings, yet hasn't been taken off

Bresnan was bowling ok earlier, he should have been used more this innings

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2961 on: August 04, 2013, 04:26:36 PM »
Its all about time. They run two and it takes longer to bowl the next ball than a dot and back to the bowler. What they score is irrelevant, keep them out there.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2962 on: August 04, 2013, 04:26:55 PM »
See it might benefit us, but why are they going off for light when they have flood lights?

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2963 on: August 04, 2013, 04:28:06 PM »
That's poor from a cricketing perspective.

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7950
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2964 on: August 04, 2013, 04:29:28 PM »
What a waste of electricity

Offline DrGonzo

  • Member
  • Posts: 6179
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Over the border, under the hill, on the farm.
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2965 on: August 04, 2013, 04:31:10 PM »
Get them back on.  It's the Aussies who want to bat, let them. 

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7950
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2966 on: August 04, 2013, 04:31:31 PM »
It looked to me as if the umpire said to Cook you have to bowl spin only, or we'll go off. Must have been a tough call for Cook

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36491
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2967 on: August 04, 2013, 04:37:41 PM »
See it might benefit us, but why are they going off for light when they have flood lights?

It's the umpires not the captains who decide now.

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7950
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2968 on: August 04, 2013, 04:40:18 PM »
It does beg the question what the point of the floodlights are though. Seems to me that the paying spectators are the last people taken into account

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2969 on: August 04, 2013, 04:41:36 PM »
See it might benefit us, but why are they going off for light when they have flood lights?

It's the umpires not the captains who decide now.

I know, but I think from a cricketing perspective with all those people in the crowd it's daft.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal