collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by Beard82
[Today at 10:22:50 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Concrete Tom
[Today at 09:55:56 PM]


Matty Cash by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:34:47 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:32:42 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by Villan For Life
[Today at 09:32:31 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by cdbearsfan
[Today at 07:08:01 PM]


Golf 2025 by Gareth
[Today at 06:53:45 PM]


International Rugby by UK Redsox
[Today at 06:13:58 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Cricket Thread 2013  (Read 548812 times)

Offline beness

  • Member
  • Posts: 2384
  • GM : 21.01.2018
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2580 on: July 21, 2013, 11:09:12 AM »
Bairstow goes for20

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 73469
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2581 on: July 21, 2013, 11:17:11 AM »
Absolutely bloody ludicrous that they still haven't declared.

No it isnt, grind them into the dust, keep them in the field for as long as possible, give the bowlers a good rest. give their openers only 10 mins prep time...........

We've ground them into the dust. The bowlers have had a whole night's rest. Now our wicket-keeper and, if we lose any more wickets, our bowlers will have had less preparation time as they're batting.

I could understand waiting for Root to get to 200 if he started the day on 190, but 178? That's not even particularly close.

Even more insane is that, three overs in a row, England have taken singles off the last ball to deny Root the strike. What the Hell's the point in that?

The way I see it there are two possibilities:

(i) the ball is moving. We should definitely declare to take advantage of the conditions.

(ii) the ball isn't moving. We should definitely declare to give ourselves two full days to get the Convicts out.

He's gone now, what a waste of time that was.

Offline beness

  • Member
  • Posts: 2384
  • GM : 21.01.2018
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2582 on: July 21, 2013, 11:19:41 AM »
They only wasted 20 mins, Cant see that costing us.

Offline UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42913
  • Location: Forest of Dean & Fenway Park
  • GM : 10.02.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2583 on: July 21, 2013, 11:20:30 AM »
Well, that was a wasted 20 minutes.

Given England's tactics, I'd almost like to see the Aussies bat thro' the next two days and save the match

Offline beness

  • Member
  • Posts: 2384
  • GM : 21.01.2018
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2584 on: July 21, 2013, 11:23:08 AM »
I think it was worth a shot.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 73469
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2585 on: July 21, 2013, 11:24:20 AM »
They only wasted 20 mins, Cant see that costing us.

I very much doubt it will. But why take the chance? I expect it never crossed the Aussies' minds that Anderson and Panesar could survive for in excess of an hour at Cardiff. Odd things can happen.

Does anyone know why Bairstow and Prior were taking singles off the last ball of the over to deny Root the strike? Mental.

Offline beness

  • Member
  • Posts: 2384
  • GM : 21.01.2018
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2586 on: July 21, 2013, 11:26:44 AM »
It was stupid getting singles off the last ball of an over i agree. as for the aussie second innings. they have to survive 2 days.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 73469
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2587 on: July 21, 2013, 11:27:50 AM »
It was stupid getting singles off the last ball of an over i agree. as for the aussie second innings. they have to survive 2 days.

Two days less twenty minutes.

😉

Offline beness

  • Member
  • Posts: 2384
  • GM : 21.01.2018
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2588 on: July 21, 2013, 11:28:42 AM »
It was stupid getting singles off the last ball of an over i agree. as for the aussie second innings. they have to survive 2 days.

Two days less twenty minutes.

😉

he he

Offline Chris Jameson

  • Member
  • Posts: 21621
  • DIY guru
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2589 on: July 21, 2013, 11:56:39 AM »
It's like being trapped in a room with Yorkshire members in this thread at times. I just picture those two blokes from the Muppets when reading some of the comments.

Nobody seems to have commented on Ian Bell 's reluctance to walk when he was caught.

Offline beness

  • Member
  • Posts: 2384
  • GM : 21.01.2018
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2590 on: July 21, 2013, 11:57:25 AM »
Watson gone. A review would be pointless.

Online spangley1812

  • Member
  • Posts: 6551
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2591 on: July 21, 2013, 11:58:28 AM »
Watson gone. A review would be pointless.

Would have been funny though.......

Offline beness

  • Member
  • Posts: 2384
  • GM : 21.01.2018
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2592 on: July 21, 2013, 12:00:53 PM »
Watson gone. A review would be pointless.

Would have been funny though.......

they dont seem to use it very well do they?

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29398
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2593 on: July 21, 2013, 12:03:01 PM »
What have Australia come to when their number 3, in an Ashes series, averages 27 without a Test hundred to his name.

Online spangley1812

  • Member
  • Posts: 6551
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2594 on: July 21, 2013, 12:03:52 PM »
Watson gone. A review would be pointless.

Would have been funny though.......

they dont seem to use it very well do they?

They have no idea and they dont seem to have learnt from the 1st test

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal