collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Boubacar Kamara by stevo_st
[Today at 09:10:27 AM]


Matty Cash by chrisw1
[Today at 09:08:18 AM]


The combined Maccabi thread - now with are you going? poll by ChicagoLion
[Today at 08:34:13 AM]


Wake me up when it's over by Lucky Eddie
[Today at 08:18:57 AM]


I know none of you care but ........ (the Baseball thread) by Meanwood Villa
[Today at 08:15:42 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by ChicagoLion
[Today at 07:57:35 AM]


Ezri Konsa by eye digress
[Today at 06:17:57 AM]


Evann Guessand by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 02:04:38 AM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Cricket Thread 2013  (Read 555030 times)

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56058
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2370 on: July 18, 2013, 07:52:33 PM »
Ha yes indeed, he's pretty annoying.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56058
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2371 on: July 18, 2013, 07:54:33 PM »
We need Bresnan, Broad and Swann to bat well tomorrow. Bresnan in particular needs to get runs as that's part of the reason he's been selected.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56058
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2372 on: July 18, 2013, 08:20:48 PM »
Incidently I don't like this talk of the third umpire being able to overturn decisions regardless of reviews. The reviews add a tactical element of the game, but having the third umpire be able to overturn any decision takes too much away from the umpire.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37845
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2373 on: July 18, 2013, 08:21:20 PM »
Lovely knock from Bell again, pretty disappointed with prior, that 3 out of 3 where he's played a silly shot and given his wicket away.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56058
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2374 on: July 18, 2013, 08:24:51 PM »
Lovely knock from Bell again, pretty disappointed with prior, that 3 out of 3 where he's played a silly shot and given his wicket away.

Yes and he needs to look at that, the thing of 'it's his natural game' is bollocks. Play to the circumstances.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56058
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2375 on: July 18, 2013, 08:36:16 PM »
Bairstow must start playing straighter, he got a decent score today but could easily have been out very cheaply with a various obvious technical problem.

Offline The Left Side

  • Member
  • Posts: 8012
  • Location: Somewhere between Brum and Vancouver
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2376 on: July 18, 2013, 08:42:10 PM »
Good day really, nicely balance but if we can get to 325 then we can get at them.

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • Posts: 44302
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2377 on: July 18, 2013, 08:59:25 PM »
Hmmm Australia's day overall
How? At best it's even. England have got nearly 300 with 3 wickets in hand. Will get 350 and with a bit of luck close to 400. Runs in the bank and Aussies have to come out and bat well now.

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • Posts: 44302
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2378 on: July 18, 2013, 09:00:51 PM »
Bairstow must start playing straighter, he got a decent score today but could easily have been out very cheaply with a various obvious technical problem.
The way he got out twice today shows that he is not international material and unlikely to improve.

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29624
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2379 on: July 18, 2013, 09:01:05 PM »
Hmmm Australia's day overall
How? At best it's even. England have got nearly 300 with 3 wickets in hand. Will get 350 and with a bit of luck close to 400. Runs in the bank and Aussies have to come out and bat well now.

We'd be very lucky to get 400. This has 310 all out written on it.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2013, 09:02:49 PM by Montbert »

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56058
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2380 on: July 18, 2013, 09:01:34 PM »
Hmmm Australia's day overall
How? At best it's even. England have got nearly 300 with 3 wickets in hand. Will get 350 and with a bit of luck close to 400. Runs in the bank and Aussies have to come out and bat well now.

On that pitch it's definitely Australia's day. If you chose to bat on a flat wicket with no cloud, you're looking at 400 certainly.

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • Posts: 44302
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2381 on: July 18, 2013, 09:02:14 PM »
As I said with a bit of luck.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56058
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2382 on: July 18, 2013, 09:02:15 PM »
289-4 is good, 289-7 is ok at best.

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • Posts: 44302
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2383 on: July 18, 2013, 09:04:15 PM »
On that pitch it's definitely Australia's day. If you chose to bat on a flat wicket with no cloud, you're looking at 400 certainly.
Yes I agree but it's not like England are 160 for 7!

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56058
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #2384 on: July 18, 2013, 09:06:54 PM »
No but it's still Australia's day. I'm not saying it's game over, but if you were offered the choice you'd take Australia's current position on that pitch over ours. Now we might bowl brilliantly and skittle them, but it doesn't change the fact that the batting unit isn't performing at the moment and hasn't done consistently for a while.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal