collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by Beard82
[Today at 10:22:50 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Concrete Tom
[Today at 09:55:56 PM]


Matty Cash by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:34:47 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:32:42 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by Villan For Life
[Today at 09:32:31 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by cdbearsfan
[Today at 07:08:01 PM]


Golf 2025 by Gareth
[Today at 06:53:45 PM]


International Rugby by UK Redsox
[Today at 06:13:58 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Cricket Thread 2013  (Read 548808 times)

Offline The Left Side

  • Member
  • Posts: 8006
  • Location: Somewhere between Brum and Vancouver
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1950 on: July 12, 2013, 06:24:53 PM »
Well done England, especially Belly

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1951 on: July 12, 2013, 06:24:59 PM »
Brilliant from England, that's a hell of an effort to bat out the day.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1952 on: July 12, 2013, 06:25:31 PM »
Calm down James, and there you go appealing for massive inside edge.

yep, what pattinson did there double appealing for lbw on a big edge is just as bad.

Have you ever played the game? I was a spin bowler and it's pretty difficult to tell when a batsman has got an edge on a delivery that is going to hit the stumps, you aren't really looking at the batsman on your follow through, you are running off the pitch. Doubly hard for a pace bowler I'd have thought. Unless I heard the nick I appealed.

Twice?

Unless told by the wicket keeper or slips that there was definitely an edge then yes, until the umpire gives it one way or the other then it's worth the appeal if I thought it was lbw.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37408
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1953 on: July 12, 2013, 06:25:35 PM »
Moving on, massive partnership from Bell and Broad, both did exactly what was needed and the game has swung quite heavily in our favour now.  We should get a lead well over 300, probably closer to 350 now.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1954 on: July 12, 2013, 06:29:40 PM »
We need to look at 300 + on this pitch.

Offline curiousorange

  • Member
  • Posts: 9354
  • Location: In the sauce
    • Chris Stanley's Bazaar
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1955 on: July 12, 2013, 06:54:52 PM »
Got to be pleased with that. If Bell and Broad are in 15 minutes after play starts tomorrow, England will cruise past 300.

Offline Steve R

  • Member
  • Posts: 3347
  • Age: 74
  • GM : Aug, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1956 on: July 12, 2013, 07:14:53 PM »
Well played to Broad for approaching Test Match batting like Test Match batting and not the John Player Sunday league. He should do it more often.

Great innings from Bell. He must have felt under pressure to produce something and on a difficult pitch did just that. Top bollocks.

150 on this pitch is a tough target. With whatever England can scrat together tomorrow Australia should be out of it.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37408
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1957 on: July 12, 2013, 07:25:52 PM »
Australia look short of a top class spinner to really get the most out of the pitch, we have one of the best around, I confidently predict a Swann 5for over the weekend (with a slight warning that what could scupper this is a wonder spell from Jimmy like the first inning).

Offline UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42913
  • Location: Forest of Dean & Fenway Park
  • GM : 10.02.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1958 on: July 12, 2013, 07:36:13 PM »
Mikey Holding made an interesting point during Sky's analysis; ie how was Broad's failure to walk any different to Ramdin not saying he dropped the ball. The latter was banned for two games for "conduct that is contrary to the spirit of the game"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/22846305

My opinion is that its not up to a batsman to say they've hit the ball or for a fielder to say that they've dropped it. That's the Umpire's job.

NB - as I've said before, I'd also ban "appealing". A player's either out or they're not, how convincing the appeal is should not make a difference.

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 44008
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1959 on: July 12, 2013, 07:38:49 PM »
I guess Aleem Dar "gave back" Trott decision by Erasamus. Very lucky man Broad.

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 43167
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1960 on: July 12, 2013, 07:53:37 PM »
We need to look at 300 + on this pitch.

I don't think the Aussies will gwt anywhere near 220. 300 plus will make us feel very safe, but with the ball spitting and turning for Swanny to the left handers and Jimmy reversing it, we will blitz them.

Offline Rotterdam

  • Member
  • Posts: 4595
  • GM : 06.03.2025
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1961 on: July 12, 2013, 07:58:08 PM »
Brilliant from England, that's a hell of an effort to bat out the day.

Ditto.

Online spangley1812

  • Member
  • Posts: 6551
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1962 on: July 12, 2013, 08:00:16 PM »
Mikey Holding made an interesting point during Sky's analysis; ie how was Broad's failure to walk any different to Ramdin not saying he dropped the ball. The latter was banned for two games for "conduct that is contrary to the spirit of the game"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/22846305

My opinion is that its not up to a batsman to say they've hit the ball or for a fielder to say that they've dropped it. That's the Umpire's job.

NB - as I've said before, I'd also ban "appealing". A player's either out or they're not, how convincing the appeal is should not make a difference.

There is a huge difference as Ramdin "claimed" the catch......

Offline curiousorange

  • Member
  • Posts: 9354
  • Location: In the sauce
    • Chris Stanley's Bazaar
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1963 on: July 12, 2013, 08:52:02 PM »
Mikey Holding made an interesting point during Sky's analysis; ie how was Broad's failure to walk any different to Ramdin not saying he dropped the ball. The latter was banned for two games for "conduct that is contrary to the spirit of the game"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/22846305

My opinion is that its not up to a batsman to say they've hit the ball or for a fielder to say that they've dropped it. That's the Umpire's job.

NB - as I've said before, I'd also ban "appealing". A player's either out or they're not, how convincing the appeal is should not make a difference.

There is a huge difference as Ramdin "claimed" the catch......

Yeah, that's what I thought too. There's a fine line, as you can say Broad 'conned' the umpire with his reaction, but Ramdin tried to claim credit for something that wasn't true, while Broad stuck with the umpire's call and didn't speak up. One broke the laws, the other followed them to the letter.

Offline wombat

  • Member
  • Posts: 3847
  • Location: Naughty Norton, The Bel Air of Stourbridge
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #1964 on: July 12, 2013, 09:28:30 PM »
Never mind all this walk don't walk business.

Did anybody hear Blowers rapping at lunch on TMS with the Duckworth Lewis Method... it's was priceless....

However, not as funny as later in the day when Blowers was commentating with Tuffers he described his appearance as an MC thusly 'The Duckworth Lewis Method featuring Blow Job!'... I thought Tuffers was going to lay an egg! Brilliant Radio!

England to go onto to a 350 lead and skittle the Aussies for about 180-200. Beautiful.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal