collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by Beard82
[Today at 10:22:50 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Concrete Tom
[Today at 09:55:56 PM]


Matty Cash by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:34:47 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:32:42 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by Villan For Life
[Today at 09:32:31 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by cdbearsfan
[Today at 07:08:01 PM]


Golf 2025 by Gareth
[Today at 06:53:45 PM]


International Rugby by UK Redsox
[Today at 06:13:58 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Cricket Thread 2013  (Read 548825 times)

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37408
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #660 on: May 31, 2013, 03:54:41 PM »
Another bad over, you can't bowl waist high on leg in international cricket.

Lovely first delivery of the next from Bres, more like that and we'll get some joy.  2nd was similar.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #661 on: May 31, 2013, 05:36:45 PM »
Bit harsh on Bres Paul, this is the best I've seen him bowl in about 2 years. He's got some nip back and is keeping it tight. Woakes has been really poor.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #662 on: May 31, 2013, 05:37:53 PM »
I see England have called up Boyd Rankin to the squad, obviously they've watched Dernbach and realised he's hopeless.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #663 on: May 31, 2013, 06:03:53 PM »
I just don't get the obsession with Dernbach, he's the most expensive bowler in ODI cricket. I just don't rate him, they bang on about his variations but he's all over the place.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #664 on: May 31, 2013, 06:20:55 PM »
Desperate wicketkeeping from Buttler.

Online Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13963
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #665 on: May 31, 2013, 06:22:06 PM »
I just don't get the obsession with Dernbach, he's the most expensive bowler in ODI cricket. I just don't rate him, they bang on about his variations but he's all over the place.

Woakes isn't the answer and neither is Rankin. Woakes is not an international class bowler and Rankin is far too wayward. We will really miss Broad and Finn in the next couple of games.

Online Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13963
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #666 on: May 31, 2013, 06:23:58 PM »
Fine innings from Guptil. Exactly what England needed and didn't get.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #667 on: May 31, 2013, 06:24:37 PM »
I just don't get the obsession with Dernbach, he's the most expensive bowler in ODI cricket. I just don't rate him, they bang on about his variations but he's all over the place.

Woakes isn't the answer and neither is Rankin. Woakes is not an international class bowler and Rankin is far too wayward. We will really miss Broad and Finn in the next couple of games.

Indeed I can't see Woakes ever being an international bowler.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #668 on: May 31, 2013, 06:25:02 PM »
I'm glad Guptill got his century he earned it and that was a bit of a hammering.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37408
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #669 on: May 31, 2013, 06:41:28 PM »
Bit harsh on Bres Paul, this is the best I've seen him bowl in about 2 years. He's got some nip back and is keeping it tight. Woakes has been really poor.

The bad over comment was about woakes not bres.  I thought swann, jimmy and bres bowled really well today.

woakes really struggled but it's harsh to say he's not international class because of it, he needs a bit of time to see if he can step up.  I still think there is a special player in there, he's very intelligent with the ball and bats well enough to score big runs at the death.  He looked a bit out of his depth today, dropping him would ruin his confidence though so they need to give him the next game as the minimum.

Dernbach was the same as he always is, lots of poor deliveries which were punished and made him expensive but enough good deliveries for the selectors to still think there's something there to work with.  The LBW that was overturned was a peach for example, and he had a beauty of an inswinging yorker in the same spell that deserved something.  If he could stop drifting onto leg he'd be a good ODI bowler but that tendency for the ball to slip out the side just makes him expensive and frustrating.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #670 on: May 31, 2013, 08:34:01 PM »
A lot of comments on the bowling here but if your batsmen can only score 227 0n a decent pitch then they are on a hiding to nothing really.
Woakes was poor though, and he hasn't yet shown anything in International cricket. One who will only ever be a good County player maybe? Time yet but he needs to do something soon or he will just get forgotten by the selectors.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55558
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #671 on: May 31, 2013, 08:37:01 PM »
A lot of comments on the bowling here but if your batsmen can only score 227 0n a decent pitch then they are on a hiding to nothing really.
Woakes was poor though, and he hasn't yet shown anything in International cricket. One who will only ever be a good County player maybe? Time yet but he needs to do something soon or he will just get forgotten by the selectors.

Yeah I'd agree with that and the principle problem was batsmen getting in and then out, we've been doing that quite a lot lately in ODIs.

Offline Steve R

  • Member
  • Posts: 3347
  • Age: 74
  • GM : Aug, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #672 on: June 01, 2013, 06:08:48 AM »
...

The turgid batting was a understandable to a degree, Cook personally wanted to push the score along, blocking up the other end to avoid losing early wickets wasn't such  bad idea.

...

Against a side who lost their best fast bowler after 2 overs and on a pitch that was as predictable as a car park at the time?

It's hardly a one man attack and in NZ they looked pretty useful on pitches far blander than Lords against a batting line-up that hasn't been that solid since the capitulation to Pakistan in the UAE.

Online JD

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10221
  • Location: Canterbury NZ
  • Stay Free
  • GM : 19.01.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #673 on: June 01, 2013, 06:17:38 AM »
New Zealand aren't a bad One Day Team and on their day can beat anyone, so don't underestimate them. Guptill is a very classy one day and T20 batsmen. 
England just didn't score enough. You need 260+ to even be competitive in one-dayers nowadays. 

Offline The Left Side

  • Member
  • Posts: 8006
  • Location: Somewhere between Brum and Vancouver
Re: The Cricket Thread 2013
« Reply #674 on: June 01, 2013, 06:15:21 PM »
Looks like a nice day at Edgbaston

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal