Quote from: Ad@m on December 29, 2012, 09:15:10 PMAs for selling up - he's sunk £200m in to the club which he'd want to see a fair chunk of back. You only have to look at Blackburn and the Blues to see that new foreign owners are not necessarily a good thing. I think our best approach is to put pressure on Randy to spend more money on players.I suppose the one good thing about him investing so much in the club is that if he wants to sell, then the buyer would have to be a really serious player in the market.On the downside, has too much money been invested to make us saleable.
As for selling up - he's sunk £200m in to the club which he'd want to see a fair chunk of back. You only have to look at Blackburn and the Blues to see that new foreign owners are not necessarily a good thing. I think our best approach is to put pressure on Randy to spend more money on players.
I really hope you are right. I happen to agree that this will happen, however, if he does not invest and we do go down he will have to go down as one of the worst club owners in history. I mean who could destroy a top 6 team and get them relegated within five years. It couldn't happen to a club like Villa!
Quote from: ozzjim on December 29, 2012, 09:28:56 PMIs Spiderman one or 2 words? MmmmAnyhow, it is simple for me. He backed Lambert last summer, if he believes in his manager and wants to help him move the club forward he has to back him this winter with another 20 million or so, which he can afford. He has invested in the past money wise when we have needed him too, and boy we need it now more than ever. As such, for me it is invest and back Lambert, or face relegation being a real possibility and not being able to get back anything on his investment. He is not as stupid or moronic as people make out I am sure, so I think the investment will be there this winter.I really hope you are right. I happen to agree that this will happen, however, if he does not invest and we do go down he will have to go down as one of the worst club owners in history. I mean who could destroy a top 6 team and get them relegated within five years. It couldn't happen to a club like Villa!
Is Spiderman one or 2 words? MmmmAnyhow, it is simple for me. He backed Lambert last summer, if he believes in his manager and wants to help him move the club forward he has to back him this winter with another 20 million or so, which he can afford. He has invested in the past money wise when we have needed him too, and boy we need it now more than ever. As such, for me it is invest and back Lambert, or face relegation being a real possibility and not being able to get back anything on his investment. He is not as stupid or moronic as people make out I am sure, so I think the investment will be there this winter.
Quote from: hawkeye on December 29, 2012, 09:38:03 PMWho appointed Faulkner?First prize for stating the bleeding obvious hawkeye.Isn't it worth changing Faulkner before we hound out the guy who put £200m in to our club?
Who appointed Faulkner?
Quote from: dave.woodhall on December 29, 2012, 09:09:16 PMI look forward to the contributions of you both.Feel free to use any of my posts, especially the ones about stupid Americans.
I look forward to the contributions of you both.
Quote from: hilts_coolerking on December 29, 2012, 09:12:49 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on December 29, 2012, 09:09:16 PMI look forward to the contributions of you both.Feel free to use any of my posts, especially the ones about stupid Americans.That's 280,000,000 of them. Can you narrow it down a bit please?
I was sat next to a Browns fan at an NFL game this week, and his vitriol and sweariness when the topic of Randy Lerner came up made mine and Fletch's rants seem rather timid in comparison. We both agreed that he was rather useless, and had a couple more beers to celebrate his ongoing idiocy.
when the topic of Randy Lerner came up made mine and Fletch's rants seem rather timid in comparison.