Quote from: nornironvillain on December 01, 2012, 12:23:17 AM 2,3,4,5 kicks in the balls!!!!!!.That could be us, on the freeway, laughing at squares and eating corn dogs. I'd tip waitresses, you wouldn't but you'd help them with their music. Wyoming, Idaho, Utah...just us and our thoughts. x
2,3,4,5 kicks in the balls!!!!!!.
Quote from: ozzjim on November 30, 2012, 11:42:39 PMQuote from: Rissbert on November 30, 2012, 11:20:15 PMQuote from: GordonCowansisthegreatest on November 30, 2012, 10:56:52 PMIn his pre-match interview, Lambert repeatedly said that he based his selections on "What I see day in and day out on the training ground". He couldn't have made it any clearer, why Bent was not figuring.Even if he spent training on a deckchair in the penalty area, he'd be a better bet than Albrighton, who appears to have forgotten how to play football.But may be doing really well in training and thus making the bench based on the fact he gives us width. In training he might be whipping brilliant balls across. We don't see it. We see how crap he is in matches though. He hasn't had a good game in two years. But anway, it's completely Lambert's choice not to play Bent. I just hope his pig headedness doesn't lead to relegation and him losing his job over it, as that would be a very expensive price to pay for making a point.
Quote from: Rissbert on November 30, 2012, 11:20:15 PMQuote from: GordonCowansisthegreatest on November 30, 2012, 10:56:52 PMIn his pre-match interview, Lambert repeatedly said that he based his selections on "What I see day in and day out on the training ground". He couldn't have made it any clearer, why Bent was not figuring.Even if he spent training on a deckchair in the penalty area, he'd be a better bet than Albrighton, who appears to have forgotten how to play football.But may be doing really well in training and thus making the bench based on the fact he gives us width. In training he might be whipping brilliant balls across. We don't see it.
Quote from: GordonCowansisthegreatest on November 30, 2012, 10:56:52 PMIn his pre-match interview, Lambert repeatedly said that he based his selections on "What I see day in and day out on the training ground". He couldn't have made it any clearer, why Bent was not figuring.Even if he spent training on a deckchair in the penalty area, he'd be a better bet than Albrighton, who appears to have forgotten how to play football.
In his pre-match interview, Lambert repeatedly said that he based his selections on "What I see day in and day out on the training ground". He couldn't have made it any clearer, why Bent was not figuring.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on December 01, 2012, 01:05:58 AMQuote from: Rissbert on December 01, 2012, 01:02:47 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on December 01, 2012, 12:58:36 AMQuote from: Rissbert on December 01, 2012, 12:53:20 AMNorn, we've worked out between us that the maximum we probably still owe Sunderland is between £1m and £2m. I looked at the accounts, Dave W seems to have talked to somebody at the club. It's not a small amount but probably not worth leaving him out over.And that's the total potentially owing. I don't think it's all for fifty appearances - some of it will be tied up in stuff like European qualification and winning trophies. Indeed. Although I bet Sunderland didn't put too much on the winning trophies bit. "£2m if you qualify for the Champions League?, bollocks Mr Lerner, we'll have it when Benty scores 30 goals if you don't mind!"I'd guess it'll be both, along with everything from staying up to playing in Euro 2012.The rumour was that £3m was payable on us staying up. That would tally with what's in the accounts as well.
Quote from: Rissbert on December 01, 2012, 01:02:47 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on December 01, 2012, 12:58:36 AMQuote from: Rissbert on December 01, 2012, 12:53:20 AMNorn, we've worked out between us that the maximum we probably still owe Sunderland is between £1m and £2m. I looked at the accounts, Dave W seems to have talked to somebody at the club. It's not a small amount but probably not worth leaving him out over.And that's the total potentially owing. I don't think it's all for fifty appearances - some of it will be tied up in stuff like European qualification and winning trophies. Indeed. Although I bet Sunderland didn't put too much on the winning trophies bit. "£2m if you qualify for the Champions League?, bollocks Mr Lerner, we'll have it when Benty scores 30 goals if you don't mind!"I'd guess it'll be both, along with everything from staying up to playing in Euro 2012.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on December 01, 2012, 12:58:36 AMQuote from: Rissbert on December 01, 2012, 12:53:20 AMNorn, we've worked out between us that the maximum we probably still owe Sunderland is between £1m and £2m. I looked at the accounts, Dave W seems to have talked to somebody at the club. It's not a small amount but probably not worth leaving him out over.And that's the total potentially owing. I don't think it's all for fifty appearances - some of it will be tied up in stuff like European qualification and winning trophies. Indeed. Although I bet Sunderland didn't put too much on the winning trophies bit. "£2m if you qualify for the Champions League?, bollocks Mr Lerner, we'll have it when Benty scores 30 goals if you don't mind!"
Quote from: Rissbert on December 01, 2012, 12:53:20 AMNorn, we've worked out between us that the maximum we probably still owe Sunderland is between £1m and £2m. I looked at the accounts, Dave W seems to have talked to somebody at the club. It's not a small amount but probably not worth leaving him out over.And that's the total potentially owing. I don't think it's all for fifty appearances - some of it will be tied up in stuff like European qualification and winning trophies.
Norn, we've worked out between us that the maximum we probably still owe Sunderland is between £1m and £2m. I looked at the accounts, Dave W seems to have talked to somebody at the club. It's not a small amount but probably not worth leaving him out over.
Paper rumours..... Lambert could be forced to sell Bent for a cut price 10mil. QPR sniffing around.
I really do not understand why we would sign into a appearance clause for an established experienced player. Saving us from relegation yes, getting to a particular position in the League yes, winning a cup or something yes, qualifying for Europe etc yes but number of appearance and at that as low as 50 NO.
All this talk of £3 Million in clauses makes Villa look small-time. The root of Villa's problems lies at the Chairman's door. We never hear a thing from him so we haven't a clue at his intentions for the club, although I suspect his current austerity measures are probably linked to the Bent situation. As I've said before, he needs to sell up and move out. No wonder the Browns fans were glad to see the back of him!
Quote from: Villafirst on December 01, 2012, 10:48:23 AMAll this talk of £3 Million in clauses makes Villa look small-time. The root of Villa's problems lies at the Chairman's door. We never hear a thing from him so we haven't a clue at his intentions for the club, although I suspect his current austerity measures are probably linked to the Bent situation. As I've said before, he needs to sell up and move out. No wonder the Browns fans were glad to see the back of him!Whilst I agree that the Chairman is utterly useless, there is no evidence at all about this supposed £3m add on, so you can't have a go at him for that.