Bent is not fit, that is why he was not involved
Quote from: hawkeye on November 27, 2012, 11:26:37 PMBent is not fit, that is why he was not involvedEven though he himself has said that he's been fit and ready to play for the past two matches?
Quote from: Dave on November 27, 2012, 11:28:18 PMQuote from: hawkeye on November 27, 2012, 11:26:37 PMBent is not fit, that is why he was not involvedEven though he himself has said that he's been fit and ready to play for the past two matches?which means absoloutely nothing.
Quote from: sirlordbaltimore on November 27, 2012, 11:05:29 PMI think it's time for Lambert to stop the bullshit and just be honest. The rumour that suggests we're not playing him as the add ons clause will kick in to the tune of a few million sounds extremely plausible, and frankly if true then i'm appalledThe most depressing thing in all that is the fact that, regardless of whether it is actually true or not, it is all so totally plausible.
I think it's time for Lambert to stop the bullshit and just be honest. The rumour that suggests we're not playing him as the add ons clause will kick in to the tune of a few million sounds extremely plausible, and frankly if true then i'm appalled
How about.......he's not actually fully fit despite one tweet telling us otherwise and the physios have suggested he rest for another game or two to avoid aggravating a niggly injury? Just a thought, surely better than conspiracy theories about clauses and arguments?
I'd be fascinated to hear the reasons of the 22 people (at the time of posting) who wouldn't even want him on the bench.I can understand the logic of those who wouldn't want him starting (although I disagree with them), but I genuinely can't imagine there was anyone in the stadium on 78 minutes tonight who was glad that he wasn't an option to bring on.