Difficult to imagine anyone bears more responsibility than Lerner and Faulkner.Lerner took 12 months too long in realising O'Neill was limited, to say nothing of his wasteful spending. Then he appointed a manager who hadn't had a decent Premier League season for 10 years but who did have a history of serious health problems. Fast forward 9 months and we're fighting relegation and the manager has had to retire due to serious health problems. It doesn't take a genius to see that as a potential outcome, but Lerner apparently did not.Then Lerner seemingly goes through a list of replacements before deciding that Alex McLeish was the answer. But even then he had thought about Roberto Martinez - and the type of football he plays - before going for McLeish, and the type of football he plays. In Lerner's method there didn't appear to be any common sense or even a clear idea of what he wanted.And through all that period we've been selling our best players, and only partially reinvesting the money - often on inexperienced players - with the predictable effect on the overall quality of the squad.It really does surprise me that there isn't more criticism of Lerner and Faulkner, especially on H&V
I blame Drummond. Nothing ever good comes from *that* side of the Pennines. Whippet-botherers.
Denise van Outen - the slut.Things have never been the same since she corrupted Stanley VC.And how she is getting top marks on Strictly I'll never know. Can't be sleeping with the judges as only 1 of them prefers women.
we have good times, we have bad. this season was always going to be a bumby ride ... with the bellyaching!
MO'N.
Initially, yes. I blame him for being the root cause of our current situation. He is not solely culpable, though.