collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Should we have Downing back ?  (Read 30233 times)

Online VILLA MOLE

  • Member
  • Posts: 8091
  • Age: 50
  • Location: STRATFORD UPON AVON
  • a v f c
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #90 on: November 16, 2012, 08:57:58 PM »
i would rather stewie Griffin

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43926
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #91 on: November 16, 2012, 08:59:08 PM »
NO **** NO. He is a **** and he can go **** himself with a chainsaw dipped in sulphuric acid!

Offline villanois

  • Member
  • Posts: 87
  • Age: 62
  • Location: st louis usa
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #92 on: November 16, 2012, 09:05:02 PM »
It seems Lambert wants players that will work hard to win the ball back, so that's a no. Won't get a team any where paying him the kind of money the dippers are paying him. Can see him continuing his easy life, content with being second choice to 17 year olds and picking up his fat pay cheque.

Offline DrGonzo

  • Member
  • Posts: 6175
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Over the border, under the hill, on the farm.
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #93 on: November 16, 2012, 09:09:40 PM »
Fuck no.  Sorry I didn't notice who started the thread before I thought "fuck no", but whoever it was...fuck no.

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43926
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #94 on: November 16, 2012, 09:17:16 PM »
It really is laughable what Liverpool did last season. Carroll, Downing, Adams, Henderson £100m worth of junk bought to start with plus about £20m wages. Hopefully they will not recover from this fir a few years.

Offline cheltenhamlion

  • Member
  • Posts: 18734
  • Location: Pedmore, Stourbridge
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #95 on: November 16, 2012, 09:24:39 PM »
Ta to Villa Mole by the way.

Offline clash city rocker

  • Member
  • Posts: 3773
  • Location: Out in the sticks these days
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #96 on: November 16, 2012, 09:26:33 PM »
Hopefully the conversation Rodgers will have with him come january is along the lines of;

" Grab a seat Stewey babe, i've some good news for you. Two offers , yes two offers . Both are the same so the choice is yours. Blackpool or Blackburn.Now i don't want to rush you but which one can i palm you off to ".

Online VILLA MOLE

  • Member
  • Posts: 8091
  • Age: 50
  • Location: STRATFORD UPON AVON
  • a v f c
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #97 on: November 16, 2012, 09:29:40 PM »
Ta to Villa Mole by the way.

sorry is that your name
 :)

Online VILLA MOLE

  • Member
  • Posts: 8091
  • Age: 50
  • Location: STRATFORD UPON AVON
  • a v f c
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #98 on: November 16, 2012, 09:34:41 PM »
Hopefully the conversation Rodgers will have with him come january is along the lines of;

" Grab a seat Stewey babe, i've some good news for you. Two offers , yes two offers . Both are the same so the choice is yours. Blackpool or Blackburn.Now i don't want to rush you but which one can i palm you off to ".

look forward to that on Channel 5

Online ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31127
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #99 on: November 16, 2012, 09:34:43 PM »
Hate him, but yes. Get him back to the player he was and he would be a brilliant signing for 7 ish million.

Offline gervilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 2893
  • Location: Co. Cork
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #100 on: November 16, 2012, 09:35:07 PM »
No thanks .
Stewie can f***k right off.

Offline Chipsticks

  • Member
  • Posts: 7207
  • GM : 22.04.2015
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #101 on: November 16, 2012, 09:54:39 PM »
No. Let him go to QPR.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15456
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #102 on: November 16, 2012, 10:01:02 PM »
It really is laughable what Liverpool did last season. Carroll, Downing, Adams, Henderson £100m worth of junk bought to start with plus about £20m wages. Hopefully they will not recover from this fir a few years.

None of which was "King" Kenny's fault according to their fans.  I've heard them on phone-ins blaming everyone but Dalglish for those signings.

Offline curiousorange

  • Member
  • Posts: 9331
  • Location: In the sauce
    • Chris Stanley's Bazaar
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #103 on: November 16, 2012, 10:54:41 PM »
I never thought he was that effective anyway - for me, it was always a case of better players making him look better than he was. Young and Milner did the real creating in the seasons they were together and Downing's slightly above-average talent was caught in the slipstream of it.

So, like, no.

Offline Rodders

  • Member
  • Posts: 949
  • Location: Manor House, The Shire
  • GM : 30.08.2024
Re: Should we have Downing back ?
« Reply #104 on: November 16, 2012, 11:08:01 PM »
Fuck no.  Sorry I didn't notice who started the thread before I thought "fuck no", but whoever it was...fuck no.

My thoughts exactly, Ian.

I have always referred to Downing as "COC" since he deserted - some wag here on the site referred to him as "Stewart 'Came On Crutches' Downing' some time ago, and, for me, it stuck.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal