Quote from: PeterWithe on February 12, 2013, 11:01:30 AMI really want Lambert to succeed but he doesn't half make things difficult for himself, the squad is paper thin, why on earth would he want to ostracise one of the few senior pro's we have? He's not going anywhere till the summer and we are still paying his wages, he may come in useful.The voice of reason.
I really want Lambert to succeed but he doesn't half make things difficult for himself, the squad is paper thin, why on earth would he want to ostracise one of the few senior pro's we have? He's not going anywhere till the summer and we are still paying his wages, he may come in useful.
Quote from: saunders_heroes on February 12, 2013, 11:05:23 AMIt's funny how all the players that have been given the cold shoulder over the last couple of years are the ones on the most money. Anyone who thinks its nothing more than an amazing coincidence is off their rocker.Exactly!
It's funny how all the players that have been given the cold shoulder over the last couple of years are the ones on the most money. Anyone who thinks its nothing more than an amazing coincidence is off their rocker.
Quote from: PeterWithe on February 12, 2013, 11:01:30 AMI really want Lambert to succeed but he doesn't half make things difficult for himself, the squad is paper thin, why on earth would he want to ostracise one of the few senior pro's we have? He's not going anywhere till the summer and we are still paying his wages, he may come in useful.Why? Because he's shit, has taken the piss and we're better off without his attitude disrupting things.And because of the above, he won't be useful.
Quote from: saunders_heroes on February 12, 2013, 11:05:23 AMIt's funny how all the players that have been given the cold shoulder over the last couple of years are the ones on the most money. Anyone who thinks its nothing more than an amazing coincidence is off their rocker.Just can't agree in the case of Ireland. He seems to have split the fans into two camps. I am in the camp that he is a very poor player. He has had brighter moments but from memory they are often against lower league teams in cups. I haven't forgotten Chelsea away last year but that was a rare day. When he first came I recall that he was close to scoring once or twice, perhaps that's what he needed to do to settle in but it never happened. I also recall him watching the opposition stroll past him from 5 yards away (remember Sasa Curcic? Same vein). He has tried to work harder but he just doesn't deliver for me. It's all about opinions but I would have paid him off an age back. I know what you are saying about the high earners, point taken, but in his case don't think that's the reason.Exactly!
Quote from: saunders_heroes on February 12, 2013, 11:05:23 AMIt's funny how all the players that have been given the cold shoulder over the last couple of years are the ones on the most money. Anyone who thinks its nothing more than an amazing coincidence is off their rocker.It's not that funny when you look at the performances of the players in question and realise they've been awful and the general consensus from the fans was that they should be dropped/sold/used for Findus Lasagne. Possible exception to that is Bent.
Quote from: Concrete John on February 12, 2013, 11:14:56 AMQuote from: PeterWithe on February 12, 2013, 11:01:30 AMI really want Lambert to succeed but he doesn't half make things difficult for himself, the squad is paper thin, why on earth would he want to ostracise one of the few senior pro's we have? He's not going anywhere till the summer and we are still paying his wages, he may come in useful.Why? Because he's shit, has taken the piss and we're better off without his attitude disrupting things.And because of the above, he won't be useful.Most of them are shit or that's what they've shown for the bulk of the season. The opportunity to bring in less shit players has been and gone and what we are left with has to keep us up, why reduce that pool of players? Cant he fucking manage people without casting them off to the youth team?
Quote from: Ron Manager on February 12, 2013, 11:04:45 AMQuote from: PeterWithe on February 12, 2013, 11:01:30 AMI really want Lambert to succeed but he doesn't half make things difficult for himself, the squad is paper thin, why on earth would he want to ostracise one of the few senior pro's we have? He's not going anywhere till the summer and we are still paying his wages, he may come in useful.The voice of reason.If Lambert has made Ireland train with the kids then it wouldn't be just on a whim, there would be a reason why he's done it. If you don't know the reason you can't say he was wrong, or right, to take those steps.
Quote from: PeterWithe on February 12, 2013, 11:23:20 AMQuote from: Concrete John on February 12, 2013, 11:14:56 AMQuote from: PeterWithe on February 12, 2013, 11:01:30 AMI really want Lambert to succeed but he doesn't half make things difficult for himself, the squad is paper thin, why on earth would he want to ostracise one of the few senior pro's we have? He's not going anywhere till the summer and we are still paying his wages, he may come in useful.Why? Because he's shit, has taken the piss and we're better off without his attitude disrupting things.And because of the above, he won't be useful.Most of them are shit or that's what they've shown for the bulk of the season. The opportunity to bring in less shit players has been and gone and what we are left with has to keep us up, why reduce that pool of players? Cant he fucking manage people without casting them off to the youth team?His man management skills do seem questionable.
Quote from: OzVilla on February 12, 2013, 09:59:27 AMQuote from: Greg N'Ash on February 12, 2013, 09:54:31 AMQuote from: OzVilla on February 12, 2013, 09:49:11 AMQuote from: Greg N'Ash on February 12, 2013, 09:42:33 AMApparently Pubehead agreed it before walking out and the club felt honour bound to stick with the deal.Well Pubehead left 2 weeks before the Milner deal went through - i know you don't like him but lets not blame him for a signing that happened more than 2 weeks after he'd left. That's totally down to the people in charge of the club.nothing to do with disliking him. It's what the General said at the time and it makes more sense than the club buying players for a manager who they haven't appointed. My guess is they agreed in principle for Ireland to be part of the Milner deal, but it took a while for Ireland to agree his pay-off with Citeh. hence the delayOk well even if your account is correct surely all signings should have been called off, especially those involving player swaps, the second MON flounced out the door. Tough shit if a deal had been agreed, the bloke who agreed it is gone.well hindsight is a wonderful thing. From memory with the noticable exception of Chris Smith everyone wanted him. Looking back he deffo had "form" at Citeh for being trouble but most on here were swayed by his performances. Also, how would us pulling out have affected the Milner deal as although the two deals were seperate officially it amounted to Citeh paying less in cash for Milner. Would Milner have come back or would we have been in a situation of a very unhappy player seeing his dream move scuppered?
Quote from: Greg N'Ash on February 12, 2013, 09:54:31 AMQuote from: OzVilla on February 12, 2013, 09:49:11 AMQuote from: Greg N'Ash on February 12, 2013, 09:42:33 AMApparently Pubehead agreed it before walking out and the club felt honour bound to stick with the deal.Well Pubehead left 2 weeks before the Milner deal went through - i know you don't like him but lets not blame him for a signing that happened more than 2 weeks after he'd left. That's totally down to the people in charge of the club.nothing to do with disliking him. It's what the General said at the time and it makes more sense than the club buying players for a manager who they haven't appointed. My guess is they agreed in principle for Ireland to be part of the Milner deal, but it took a while for Ireland to agree his pay-off with Citeh. hence the delayOk well even if your account is correct surely all signings should have been called off, especially those involving player swaps, the second MON flounced out the door. Tough shit if a deal had been agreed, the bloke who agreed it is gone.
Quote from: OzVilla on February 12, 2013, 09:49:11 AMQuote from: Greg N'Ash on February 12, 2013, 09:42:33 AMApparently Pubehead agreed it before walking out and the club felt honour bound to stick with the deal.Well Pubehead left 2 weeks before the Milner deal went through - i know you don't like him but lets not blame him for a signing that happened more than 2 weeks after he'd left. That's totally down to the people in charge of the club.nothing to do with disliking him. It's what the General said at the time and it makes more sense than the club buying players for a manager who they haven't appointed. My guess is they agreed in principle for Ireland to be part of the Milner deal, but it took a while for Ireland to agree his pay-off with Citeh. hence the delay
Quote from: Greg N'Ash on February 12, 2013, 09:42:33 AMApparently Pubehead agreed it before walking out and the club felt honour bound to stick with the deal.Well Pubehead left 2 weeks before the Milner deal went through - i know you don't like him but lets not blame him for a signing that happened more than 2 weeks after he'd left. That's totally down to the people in charge of the club.
Apparently Pubehead agreed it before walking out and the club felt honour bound to stick with the deal.
Quote from: Greg N'Ash on February 12, 2013, 10:27:38 AMQuote from: OzVilla on February 12, 2013, 09:59:27 AMQuote from: Greg N'Ash on February 12, 2013, 09:54:31 AMQuote from: OzVilla on February 12, 2013, 09:49:11 AMQuote from: Greg N'Ash on February 12, 2013, 09:42:33 AMApparently Pubehead agreed it before walking out and the club felt honour bound to stick with the deal.Well Pubehead left 2 weeks before the Milner deal went through - i know you don't like him but lets not blame him for a signing that happened more than 2 weeks after he'd left. That's totally down to the people in charge of the club.nothing to do with disliking him. It's what the General said at the time and it makes more sense than the club buying players for a manager who they haven't appointed. My guess is they agreed in principle for Ireland to be part of the Milner deal, but it took a while for Ireland to agree his pay-off with Citeh. hence the delayOk well even if your account is correct surely all signings should have been called off, especially those involving player swaps, the second MON flounced out the door. Tough shit if a deal had been agreed, the bloke who agreed it is gone.well hindsight is a wonderful thing. From memory with the noticable exception of Chris Smith everyone wanted him. Looking back he deffo had "form" at Citeh for being trouble but most on here were swayed by his performances. Also, how would us pulling out have affected the Milner deal as although the two deals were seperate officially it amounted to Citeh paying less in cash for Milner. Would Milner have come back or would we have been in a situation of a very unhappy player seeing his dream move scuppered?I didn't want him, and made it clear at the time.For me, he's lower than Hodge.