Going for the ball and not getting it is still a red.
Quote from: lovejoy on October 29, 2012, 02:34:39 PMGoing for the ball and not getting it is still a red.He did get the ball though did'nt he?
As for the Wembley Vidic issue - I appreciate how some of you feel it doesn't matter because we weren't good enough - and that Man Utd had a man sent off against us weeks earlier and it made no difference. I disagree. Here are the excellent Martin Samuels thoughts on Vidic at Wembley ...QuoteUnited had Nani dismissed at Villa Park, after 29 minutes when the scores were tied at 1-1 and that was the score at the end.So had the scores also stayed the same when 10 played 11 yesterday, Villa would have won 1-0. Plus, there is considerable difference between losing a nippy winger with 61 minutes to go and the most experienced centre-half with 86 minutes to survive. To replace Vidic, United would have had to introduce Wes Brown at the expense of amidfielder: Ji-Sung Park, perhaps, or Antonio Valencia, who set up the winning goal and won man of the match.I tend to agree with him.
United had Nani dismissed at Villa Park, after 29 minutes when the scores were tied at 1-1 and that was the score at the end.So had the scores also stayed the same when 10 played 11 yesterday, Villa would have won 1-0. Plus, there is considerable difference between losing a nippy winger with 61 minutes to go and the most experienced centre-half with 86 minutes to survive. To replace Vidic, United would have had to introduce Wes Brown at the expense of amidfielder: Ji-Sung Park, perhaps, or Antonio Valencia, who set up the winning goal and won man of the match.
Yes Villa were poor against Norwich - but they came to play nine men behind the ball and stifle the middle - they succeeded in the main.But watch our first goal again - against the run of play - not a fluke - not a hopeful glancing header from a set piece - or a deflected toe poke - it was pass then move then cross then control then sublime finish. And I mean sublime finish.Don't tell me if we'd have had our full compliment on the pitch we wouldn't have scored again instead of enduring a battering. Because I won't believe you.
Quote from: Clampy on October 29, 2012, 02:47:32 PMQuote from: lovejoy on October 29, 2012, 02:34:39 PMGoing for the ball and not getting it is still a red.He did get the ball though did'nt he? Getting the ball doesn't stop it being a dangerous challenge and a red card tackle. Long could easily have been out for months and was lucky he wasn't.
Quote from: rutski on October 28, 2012, 10:38:32 PMQuote from: villan from luton on October 28, 2012, 10:33:00 PMSo rutski, are you siggesting he is just anti Villa? Was marriner anti liverpool today then and Clattenburg anti chelski, cos they fecked up as well, actually the linesmen did more soi couldnt give a flying frig about anyone else, dowd IS anti Villa. and in no way should that 2nd have been a yellow card, just as they had players making late challenges on ours and him not booking them. tell me if he would have sent off ferdinand at old trafford for that? the answer is a resounding no. would he have sent off my son in a under 12's game at enville this morning? no! he should though because the laws of the game are exactly the same. it should have been a talking to at best, both players were at it.It was a yellow card offence for which a yellow card was rightly shown. I'm struggling to see what the issue is.
Quote from: villan from luton on October 28, 2012, 10:33:00 PMSo rutski, are you siggesting he is just anti Villa? Was marriner anti liverpool today then and Clattenburg anti chelski, cos they fecked up as well, actually the linesmen did more soi couldnt give a flying frig about anyone else, dowd IS anti Villa. and in no way should that 2nd have been a yellow card, just as they had players making late challenges on ours and him not booking them. tell me if he would have sent off ferdinand at old trafford for that? the answer is a resounding no. would he have sent off my son in a under 12's game at enville this morning? no! he should though because the laws of the game are exactly the same. it should have been a talking to at best, both players were at it.
So rutski, are you siggesting he is just anti Villa? Was marriner anti liverpool today then and Clattenburg anti chelski, cos they fecked up as well, actually the linesmen did more so
[You can believe the moon is made of cheese and General Krulak is the Big Bopper for all I care. We have struggled to create clear cut chances in a number of games this season even with eleven men -as we did up until the sending off on Saturday. Our goals for column this year bears that out. So why were we nailed on to score again with Bennett remaining on the pitch? ]This
Quote from: eastie on October 29, 2012, 03:42:16 PM[You can believe the moon is made of cheese and General Krulak is the Big Bopper for all I care. We have struggled to create clear cut chances in a number of games this season even with eleven men -as we did up until the sending off on Saturday. Our goals for column this year bears that out. So why were we nailed on to score again with Bennett remaining on the pitch? ]Thisthat is a surreal post, what are you on about?