Quote from: preston28 on September 30, 2012, 09:57:00 PMQuote from: Legion on September 30, 2012, 09:43:08 PMThe record of TSM no longer bothers me. I'm looking to the future.I was only clarifying myf's post. You can make what you want out of stats. It's the teams performance & effort on the pitch that is most important to me.I thought our performance and effort were great today.
Quote from: Legion on September 30, 2012, 09:43:08 PMThe record of TSM no longer bothers me. I'm looking to the future.I was only clarifying myf's post. You can make what you want out of stats. It's the teams performance & effort on the pitch that is most important to me.
The record of TSM no longer bothers me. I'm looking to the future.
Quote from: levico on September 30, 2012, 09:51:20 PMDoubt if many will agree with me but I thought we looked like a Championship side grinding out a plucky draw against a superior PL side.Glad we got a point but I'm concerned about this squad. And Delphi - just shocking IMO.You are Radio WM and I claim my prize.
Doubt if many will agree with me but I thought we looked like a Championship side grinding out a plucky draw against a superior PL side.Glad we got a point but I'm concerned about this squad. And Delphi - just shocking IMO.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on September 30, 2012, 09:56:52 PMQuote from: levico on September 30, 2012, 09:51:20 PMDoubt if many will agree with me but I thought we looked like a Championship side grinding out a plucky draw against a superior PL side.Glad we got a point but I'm concerned about this squad. And Delphi - just shocking IMO.You are Radio WM and I claim my prize.It's all doom and gloom with the Villa at WM. You should have heard them celebrate when the Baggie goal went in.
Quote from: saunders_heroes on September 30, 2012, 10:03:06 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on September 30, 2012, 09:56:52 PMQuote from: levico on September 30, 2012, 09:51:20 PMDoubt if many will agree with me but I thought we looked like a Championship side grinding out a plucky draw against a superior PL side.Glad we got a point but I'm concerned about this squad. And Delphi - just shocking IMO.You are Radio WM and I claim my prize.It's all doom and gloom with the Villa at WM. You should have heard them celebrate when the Baggie goal went in. On the way home I heard their roving reporter telling some Stripeds they had world-class support and deserved to win.
I was watching the game on TV with a stripey-filth supporting mate...we both agreed that Villa should have won the game and Baggies should be grateful for the draw. We bossed the game and outplayed Baggies in the first half and should have created more chances and scored to take advantage of the possession (at one point we were over 70% possession). I felt the 2nd half was quite evenly matched with both teams taking control and we could have taken all 3pts in the last 10 minutes.Villa fans should be disappointed by the result but not the performance; Baggies fans should be very happy with the draw.
Quote from: Matt Collins on September 30, 2012, 06:18:14 PMQuote from: DB on September 30, 2012, 06:05:47 PMDelph is lightweight, I'd go with Bannan next match and Bent for Benteke. We are still learning...I thought Delph was decent. Bannan was good when he came on, no question, and his set piece and wider delivery is a threat. But We played 442 at times and I think we'll struggle if we ask Bannan to partner KEA from the off in that systemDelph was always going to struggle after picking up an early booking. Agreed. The biggest worry with Delph is that he disappears in games. I haven't seen him have a whole good game. He looks decent in patches. Same with a few of our players actually - their age maybe. Bannan looked good when he came on but like you say, I don't fancy him in a midfield duo.
Quote from: DB on September 30, 2012, 06:05:47 PMDelph is lightweight, I'd go with Bannan next match and Bent for Benteke. We are still learning...I thought Delph was decent. Bannan was good when he came on, no question, and his set piece and wider delivery is a threat. But We played 442 at times and I think we'll struggle if we ask Bannan to partner KEA from the off in that system
Delph is lightweight, I'd go with Bannan next match and Bent for Benteke. We are still learning...
Quote from: john2710 on September 30, 2012, 09:44:59 PMDon't know if this has been mentioned elsewhere but can someone point out to me how Long was allowed to stand in an off-side position at every goal kick or clearance from the keeper, then run into an on-side position and challenge for the ball. Surely he should have been flagged as being off-side? I thought it was just me that spotted that. He was offside for every goal kick, and was never flagged even when the ball went straight to him, which it did on many occasions. Has there been a change of rules or something?
Don't know if this has been mentioned elsewhere but can someone point out to me how Long was allowed to stand in an off-side position at every goal kick or clearance from the keeper, then run into an on-side position and challenge for the ball. Surely he should have been flagged as being off-side?
Quote from: saunders_heroes on September 30, 2012, 09:55:37 PMQuote from: john2710 on September 30, 2012, 09:44:59 PMDon't know if this has been mentioned elsewhere but can someone point out to me how Long was allowed to stand in an off-side position at every goal kick or clearance from the keeper, then run into an on-side position and challenge for the ball. Surely he should have been flagged as being off-side? I thought it was just me that spotted that. He was offside for every goal kick, and was never flagged even when the ball went straight to him, which it did on many occasions. Has there been a change of rules or something?Nope, you've never been offside from a goalkick.Sadly, Clarke appeared to think you could and so didn't mark Long for a single goal kick.