OSG in principle. My one reservation is that if he's as successful as we all hope, when SAF shuffles of this mortal coil, he's likely to then be first in line to replace him. That being the case, we won't stand a chance of keeping hold of him; we'll lose him sooner or later.
OGS for me, even though the riskier option. I think I'm just seduced by the thought of a genuine shift in the culture of the club, embedding a style of passing, creativity and winning.Probably completely illogical, and Lambert has done a fantastic job with Norwich. I think I just need to feel really excited.
Lambert-don't get the OGS fever. I wouldn't be against either choice but one is more risky than the other.I don't see what's so wrong with the MON connection?Those awful top 6 finishes and cup final....bad times.Just because he knows MON-it doesn't make him prone to wasting millions on squad payers
Quote from: jonc73 on May 21, 2012, 08:10:06 PMLambert-don't get the OGS fever. I wouldn't be against either choice but one is more risky than the other.I don't see what's so wrong with the MON connection?Those awful top 6 finishes and cup final....bad times.Just because he knows MON-it doesn't make him prone to wasting millions on squad payersI guess it's the crap football people are more worried about.
OGS would play better football. Lambert would get more wins.