Quote from: damon green on May 22, 2012, 08:26:14 AMYouth, ambition, intelligence, freshness, expectation of success rather than mediocrity, total fucking absence of baggage.Lambert is a good manager, but not an exciting one. I want following the Villa to be exciting, I don't think it's too much to ask I think that sums it up for me.
Youth, ambition, intelligence, freshness, expectation of success rather than mediocrity, total fucking absence of baggage.Lambert is a good manager, but not an exciting one. I want following the Villa to be exciting, I don't think it's too much to ask
But Monty, blind optimism isnt a 'fact' at all - that's my point. I want to make my decision based on evidence, and unfortunately with Ole there isn't a lot to go by.
Quote from: mr woo on May 22, 2012, 10:42:09 AMBut Monty, blind optimism isnt a 'fact' at all - that's my point. I want to make my decision based on evidence, and unfortunately with Ole there isn't a lot to go by.As somebody aboves suggests, you can make that point for all managers though. Rodgers plays good football a Swansea, but he was a disaster at Reading. Martinez also likes to play good football, but his Wigan team are either beyond pathetic or world beaters. Lambert has done well for Norwich, but his football appears to be more functional, and is he just a good mid-table manager? The point is, that unless you're going for somebody top drawer like Wenger, or the next level down like Moyes, there isn't concrete "evidence" that they're going to be a success. I'd say Lambert, Martinez, Rodgers and OGS would all be risks to a similar degree, and all have strengths and weaknesses. OGS is definitely the most exciting choice in my opinion, and if that excitement adds 5,000 back on to the gates, that's a another reason to give him a chance.Anyway, where's the risk, really? Is he going to be as fundamentally awful as McLeish? Doubtful. Might he take a couple of years to find his feet? Probable, but if we get some good football along the way, then a season or two of midtable finishes won't hurt. Could he possibly be a masterstroke - unknown, but the chance that he might is what's so exciting.
I just think that people would get bored with Lambert very quickly.
The point is, that unless you're going for somebody top drawer like Wenger, or the next level down like Moyes, there isn't concrete "evidence" that they're going to be a success.
Lambert-don't get the OGS fever. I wouldn't be against either choice but one is more risky than the other.I don't see what's so wrong with the MON connection?Those awful top 6 finishes and cup final....bad times.Just because he knows MON-it doesn't make him prone to wasting millions on squad payers
This whole don't hire him because he'd like to manage Man U thing is stupid. It's good for a person to want to excel in whatever they do as it means they are ambitious and will want to do well. No manager lasts forever, and if one day he is good enough to manage them, then we'll have done really well from it.
Thish