Clampy: even when they were all fit, the manager who bought him (and his assistant) prefered Petrov and NRC. Like I said, I like him, I like neat and tidy footballers, but I think that's pretty damning, and I'm willing to accept that maybe he's not as good as I thought he was after that Man U game.BTW it's clearly bollocks that he only attempted one tackle. What about the penalty at Everton?
Please let us keep him.
Quote from: Lou'zie0 on May 08, 2012, 12:14:19 AMPlease let us keep him.You're begging for Emile to stay on the other thread...do you want a squad of countless shiny, happy footballers?
Quote from: Dave on May 07, 2012, 09:17:10 PMQuote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on May 07, 2012, 09:09:41 PMQuote from: Dave on May 07, 2012, 09:00:59 PMQuote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on May 07, 2012, 08:47:28 PMQuote from: Dave on May 07, 2012, 08:43:19 PMQuote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on May 07, 2012, 08:41:17 PMQuote from: ktvillan on May 07, 2012, 06:54:25 PMWow it got to the fourth post before spurious "can't tackle" fallacy was wheeled out again. Bases, once again, no doubt, on one bad challenge that got him red carded at Blackpool. And nothing else. That tackle at Blackpool was his only tackle in a Villa shirt. You do the math.Hyperbole is a wonderful linguistic tool but it doesn't really help this particular argument.No hyperbole at all, it's a fact. He made (or attempted to make) one tackle. Unless you can come up with something pretty conclusive to back that up then I'm going to assume that it's a silly statement like "Heskey always falls over" or "Collins always hoofs it".For the hard of reading: The Guardian's Chalkboard stats. How silly they are I've no idea.There's no need for the pissy attitude - I can't help if you're going to edit your posts after I've posted mine.And as they don't really exist anymore, I'm guessing the rather outlandish claim that a central midfielder only attempted one tackle in 700 or so minutes of football is something that's exaggerated. I'd expect Darren Bent will have attempted more tackles in that time on a pitch. I'm not saying that Makoun is Roy Keane, but let's be serious.I'm afraid I also find it very hard to believe he only attempted to make 1 tackle in 7 games. And in any case, if you want to be pedantic about it, it's invalid to draw a conclusion like "he can't tackle" based on a single example. You might have a case for "he doesn't tackle" assuming those dubious sounding stats are accurate.
Quote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on May 07, 2012, 09:09:41 PMQuote from: Dave on May 07, 2012, 09:00:59 PMQuote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on May 07, 2012, 08:47:28 PMQuote from: Dave on May 07, 2012, 08:43:19 PMQuote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on May 07, 2012, 08:41:17 PMQuote from: ktvillan on May 07, 2012, 06:54:25 PMWow it got to the fourth post before spurious "can't tackle" fallacy was wheeled out again. Bases, once again, no doubt, on one bad challenge that got him red carded at Blackpool. And nothing else. That tackle at Blackpool was his only tackle in a Villa shirt. You do the math.Hyperbole is a wonderful linguistic tool but it doesn't really help this particular argument.No hyperbole at all, it's a fact. He made (or attempted to make) one tackle. Unless you can come up with something pretty conclusive to back that up then I'm going to assume that it's a silly statement like "Heskey always falls over" or "Collins always hoofs it".For the hard of reading: The Guardian's Chalkboard stats. How silly they are I've no idea.There's no need for the pissy attitude - I can't help if you're going to edit your posts after I've posted mine.And as they don't really exist anymore, I'm guessing the rather outlandish claim that a central midfielder only attempted one tackle in 700 or so minutes of football is something that's exaggerated. I'd expect Darren Bent will have attempted more tackles in that time on a pitch. I'm not saying that Makoun is Roy Keane, but let's be serious.
Quote from: Dave on May 07, 2012, 09:00:59 PMQuote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on May 07, 2012, 08:47:28 PMQuote from: Dave on May 07, 2012, 08:43:19 PMQuote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on May 07, 2012, 08:41:17 PMQuote from: ktvillan on May 07, 2012, 06:54:25 PMWow it got to the fourth post before spurious "can't tackle" fallacy was wheeled out again. Bases, once again, no doubt, on one bad challenge that got him red carded at Blackpool. And nothing else. That tackle at Blackpool was his only tackle in a Villa shirt. You do the math.Hyperbole is a wonderful linguistic tool but it doesn't really help this particular argument.No hyperbole at all, it's a fact. He made (or attempted to make) one tackle. Unless you can come up with something pretty conclusive to back that up then I'm going to assume that it's a silly statement like "Heskey always falls over" or "Collins always hoofs it".For the hard of reading: The Guardian's Chalkboard stats. How silly they are I've no idea.
Quote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on May 07, 2012, 08:47:28 PMQuote from: Dave on May 07, 2012, 08:43:19 PMQuote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on May 07, 2012, 08:41:17 PMQuote from: ktvillan on May 07, 2012, 06:54:25 PMWow it got to the fourth post before spurious "can't tackle" fallacy was wheeled out again. Bases, once again, no doubt, on one bad challenge that got him red carded at Blackpool. And nothing else. That tackle at Blackpool was his only tackle in a Villa shirt. You do the math.Hyperbole is a wonderful linguistic tool but it doesn't really help this particular argument.No hyperbole at all, it's a fact. He made (or attempted to make) one tackle. Unless you can come up with something pretty conclusive to back that up then I'm going to assume that it's a silly statement like "Heskey always falls over" or "Collins always hoofs it".
Quote from: Dave on May 07, 2012, 08:43:19 PMQuote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on May 07, 2012, 08:41:17 PMQuote from: ktvillan on May 07, 2012, 06:54:25 PMWow it got to the fourth post before spurious "can't tackle" fallacy was wheeled out again. Bases, once again, no doubt, on one bad challenge that got him red carded at Blackpool. And nothing else. That tackle at Blackpool was his only tackle in a Villa shirt. You do the math.Hyperbole is a wonderful linguistic tool but it doesn't really help this particular argument.No hyperbole at all, it's a fact. He made (or attempted to make) one tackle.
Quote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on May 07, 2012, 08:41:17 PMQuote from: ktvillan on May 07, 2012, 06:54:25 PMWow it got to the fourth post before spurious "can't tackle" fallacy was wheeled out again. Bases, once again, no doubt, on one bad challenge that got him red carded at Blackpool. And nothing else. That tackle at Blackpool was his only tackle in a Villa shirt. You do the math.Hyperbole is a wonderful linguistic tool but it doesn't really help this particular argument.
Quote from: ktvillan on May 07, 2012, 06:54:25 PMWow it got to the fourth post before spurious "can't tackle" fallacy was wheeled out again. Bases, once again, no doubt, on one bad challenge that got him red carded at Blackpool. And nothing else. That tackle at Blackpool was his only tackle in a Villa shirt. You do the math.
Wow it got to the fourth post before spurious "can't tackle" fallacy was wheeled out again. Bases, once again, no doubt, on one bad challenge that got him red carded at Blackpool. And nothing else.
There's no need for the pissy attitude - I can't help if you're going to edit your posts after I've posted mine.
Quote from: eamonn on May 08, 2012, 01:09:51 AMQuote from: Lou'zie0 on May 08, 2012, 12:14:19 AMPlease let us keep him.You're begging for Emile to stay on the other thread...do you want a squad of countless shiny, happy footballers? I just want players who work for the Villa to stay. Like Emile! He gets the ball and holds it up, or heads it on. He is superb.
The last thing we needed this season was a midfield player who passed to his own team mates and helped us keep the ball. All those second halves at Villa Park this season where I've watched the opposition camped in our half and we can't lay a foot on the ball - even Stoke having better posession stats.No-one will convince me that a technically gifted ball playing midfield player was not worth perservering with. The decision got worse as the season went on particularly after we lost Petrov.
Quote from: nick harper on May 08, 2012, 05:04:30 PMThe last thing we needed this season was a midfield player who passed to his own team mates and helped us keep the ball. All those second halves at Villa Park this season where I've watched the opposition camped in our half and we can't lay a foot on the ball - even Stoke having better posession stats.No-one will convince me that a technically gifted ball playing midfield player was not worth perservering with. The decision got worse as the season went on particularly after we lost Petrov. a good post! Makoun is a good player and someone who retains and passes the ball well!