Quote from: Rigadon on April 22, 2012, 05:29:18 PMOne thing that struck me yesterday was that MON might've stood in the dug out and felt some regret. He must know that he won't take Sunderland any higher than he took us, maybe he won't even get them as far, and I think that might've dawned on him.I thought MON looked a little down and very restrained.How I yearn for the times when Randy was the greatest Chairman in the Prem..Agbonlahor had searing pace and terrified defenders..and MON was the darling of the fans and the media.I miss that.
One thing that struck me yesterday was that MON might've stood in the dug out and felt some regret. He must know that he won't take Sunderland any higher than he took us, maybe he won't even get them as far, and I think that might've dawned on him.
45 pages
Yes, but we only secured safety with about three games left, so it was a pretty close call, and like I said if we had started the next season under DOL then we may well have been relugeted and anyone who thinks any different is just dreaming.
Quote from: Malandro on April 21, 2012, 12:25:32 PMQuote from: cdvillafan on April 21, 2012, 11:16:40 AMQuote from: Malandro on April 21, 2012, 10:44:23 AMQuote from: richard moore on April 21, 2012, 08:40:07 AMQuote from: cdvillafan on April 20, 2012, 11:44:30 PMThat's because he spent all the money before he left. He knew it would go tits up. That's why he fucked off.Congratulations on what I feel is a most accurate summation of the situationA more accurate summary would be:1. American Billionaire owner arrives trying to buy success, 2. Makes grand promises to manager and fans3. Billionaire owner realises that there are other Billionaires with more money. 4. Pulls plug, loses interest5. Manager upset, walks out6. Club end up with shit players, shit manager and absent owner7. Amercian sells up and buys art workSo you think continuing to spend money we didn't have was a viable business model? Presumably you also think O'Neill was right to fuck off as soon as they asked him to actually try to manage the team he had purchased rather than giving him money to buy a new team again?You can put words into my mouth if you wish.The business model was Randy's not O'Neills. I find it odd that he is blamed for wasting money - surely the ultimate sanction is with the chairman? He either thinks its a good idea or not.Its like asking a child what they want for Christmas and giving them your credit card. (But in this case the manager bought a good team)The manager actually got us just outside the top 4 in a decent timescale and the majority of the big name signings were huge successes. Perhaps you can argue Habib Beye and the like should never have been on such huge salaries, but how much were the actual transfer fees...Why he left the club in the manner he did... broken promises. If you have financial security, its pretty easy to walk. You make it sound like Lerner was forcing these players on MON. How many times did he threaten to walk out before they finally closed the purse strings? - I can imagine the reaction at the height of the fan's Saint Martin hysteria if Lerner hadn't agreed to buy Milner for example and MON had walked out. He'll do the same at Sunderland, where it will be "buy who i want or i walk and you'll have 40,000 mackems on your back."anyway, ignoring all the conspircy theories of why he walked out, i still don't understand why anyone would applaud him for his record at least. The most expensively put together 6th placed team in premiership history and probably world football is hardly something you'd want to thank him for.
Quote from: cdvillafan on April 21, 2012, 11:16:40 AMQuote from: Malandro on April 21, 2012, 10:44:23 AMQuote from: richard moore on April 21, 2012, 08:40:07 AMQuote from: cdvillafan on April 20, 2012, 11:44:30 PMThat's because he spent all the money before he left. He knew it would go tits up. That's why he fucked off.Congratulations on what I feel is a most accurate summation of the situationA more accurate summary would be:1. American Billionaire owner arrives trying to buy success, 2. Makes grand promises to manager and fans3. Billionaire owner realises that there are other Billionaires with more money. 4. Pulls plug, loses interest5. Manager upset, walks out6. Club end up with shit players, shit manager and absent owner7. Amercian sells up and buys art workSo you think continuing to spend money we didn't have was a viable business model? Presumably you also think O'Neill was right to fuck off as soon as they asked him to actually try to manage the team he had purchased rather than giving him money to buy a new team again?You can put words into my mouth if you wish.The business model was Randy's not O'Neills. I find it odd that he is blamed for wasting money - surely the ultimate sanction is with the chairman? He either thinks its a good idea or not.Its like asking a child what they want for Christmas and giving them your credit card. (But in this case the manager bought a good team)The manager actually got us just outside the top 4 in a decent timescale and the majority of the big name signings were huge successes. Perhaps you can argue Habib Beye and the like should never have been on such huge salaries, but how much were the actual transfer fees...Why he left the club in the manner he did... broken promises. If you have financial security, its pretty easy to walk.
Quote from: Malandro on April 21, 2012, 10:44:23 AMQuote from: richard moore on April 21, 2012, 08:40:07 AMQuote from: cdvillafan on April 20, 2012, 11:44:30 PMThat's because he spent all the money before he left. He knew it would go tits up. That's why he fucked off.Congratulations on what I feel is a most accurate summation of the situationA more accurate summary would be:1. American Billionaire owner arrives trying to buy success, 2. Makes grand promises to manager and fans3. Billionaire owner realises that there are other Billionaires with more money. 4. Pulls plug, loses interest5. Manager upset, walks out6. Club end up with shit players, shit manager and absent owner7. Amercian sells up and buys art workSo you think continuing to spend money we didn't have was a viable business model? Presumably you also think O'Neill was right to fuck off as soon as they asked him to actually try to manage the team he had purchased rather than giving him money to buy a new team again?
Quote from: richard moore on April 21, 2012, 08:40:07 AMQuote from: cdvillafan on April 20, 2012, 11:44:30 PMThat's because he spent all the money before he left. He knew it would go tits up. That's why he fucked off.Congratulations on what I feel is a most accurate summation of the situationA more accurate summary would be:1. American Billionaire owner arrives trying to buy success, 2. Makes grand promises to manager and fans3. Billionaire owner realises that there are other Billionaires with more money. 4. Pulls plug, loses interest5. Manager upset, walks out6. Club end up with shit players, shit manager and absent owner7. Amercian sells up and buys art work
Quote from: cdvillafan on April 20, 2012, 11:44:30 PMThat's because he spent all the money before he left. He knew it would go tits up. That's why he fucked off.Congratulations on what I feel is a most accurate summation of the situation
That's because he spent all the money before he left. He knew it would go tits up. That's why he fucked off.
From Daily Express:"MARTIN O’NEILL could be heading for a frustrating summer after being told by Sunderland owner Ellis Short that there will be no extensive transfer budget for the Black Cats boss."http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/315941/Afraid-there-ll-be-no-big-spending-Martin-O-NeillWonder what will happen next?
Quote from: isamion on April 23, 2012, 08:16:03 AMFrom Daily Express:"MARTIN ONEILL could be heading for a frustrating summer after being told by Sunderland owner Ellis Short that there will be no extensive transfer budget for the Black Cats boss."http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/315941/Afraid-there-ll-be-no-big-spending-Martin-O-NeillWonder what will happen next?This might get worse if they have to sell anyone....God forbid.
From Daily Express:"MARTIN ONEILL could be heading for a frustrating summer after being told by Sunderland owner Ellis Short that there will be no extensive transfer budget for the Black Cats boss."http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/315941/Afraid-there-ll-be-no-big-spending-Martin-O-NeillWonder what will happen next?
Quote from: SamTheMouse on April 22, 2012, 04:25:09 PMQuote from: Ger Regan on April 22, 2012, 03:36:39 PMQuote from: Gregorys Boy on April 22, 2012, 03:28:36 PMQuote from: PeterWithesShin on April 22, 2012, 02:21:11 PMHe got 8 points more than Mr Fickle got in his last season. Not exactly an earth shattering improvement. Ok, but we still had a much better season overall, and were never going to go down. Also DOL never got three back to back top six finishes and never got us to a Cup Final and Cup Semi, so I find this idea that MON was not much better a little strange.See my post making a comparison with the situation at Portsmouth.For the record, I'm not saying Lerner is blameless in all this. At the end of the day he's meant to have the final say when it comes to finances. The thing is though (and I've said this before), had Lerner been more cautious in backing MON, he would have walked sooner. And I am fairly certain that those people criticising Lerner now for not having more control on finances would be some of the same people who would have criticised him for "interfering" with MON's work had he done so.That's probably true, but all Randy would have needed to do was let everyone know MON wanted to pay Habib Beye 42 grand a sodding week. We'd have all been right behind him, and if MON stropped out because of it, nobody would have blamed Lerner.I can't remember an occasion when fans have backed an owner against a manager who wanted more money.
Quote from: Ger Regan on April 22, 2012, 03:36:39 PMQuote from: Gregorys Boy on April 22, 2012, 03:28:36 PMQuote from: PeterWithesShin on April 22, 2012, 02:21:11 PMHe got 8 points more than Mr Fickle got in his last season. Not exactly an earth shattering improvement. Ok, but we still had a much better season overall, and were never going to go down. Also DOL never got three back to back top six finishes and never got us to a Cup Final and Cup Semi, so I find this idea that MON was not much better a little strange.See my post making a comparison with the situation at Portsmouth.For the record, I'm not saying Lerner is blameless in all this. At the end of the day he's meant to have the final say when it comes to finances. The thing is though (and I've said this before), had Lerner been more cautious in backing MON, he would have walked sooner. And I am fairly certain that those people criticising Lerner now for not having more control on finances would be some of the same people who would have criticised him for "interfering" with MON's work had he done so.That's probably true, but all Randy would have needed to do was let everyone know MON wanted to pay Habib Beye 42 grand a sodding week. We'd have all been right behind him, and if MON stropped out because of it, nobody would have blamed Lerner.
Quote from: Gregorys Boy on April 22, 2012, 03:28:36 PMQuote from: PeterWithesShin on April 22, 2012, 02:21:11 PMHe got 8 points more than Mr Fickle got in his last season. Not exactly an earth shattering improvement. Ok, but we still had a much better season overall, and were never going to go down. Also DOL never got three back to back top six finishes and never got us to a Cup Final and Cup Semi, so I find this idea that MON was not much better a little strange.See my post making a comparison with the situation at Portsmouth.For the record, I'm not saying Lerner is blameless in all this. At the end of the day he's meant to have the final say when it comes to finances. The thing is though (and I've said this before), had Lerner been more cautious in backing MON, he would have walked sooner. And I am fairly certain that those people criticising Lerner now for not having more control on finances would be some of the same people who would have criticised him for "interfering" with MON's work had he done so.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on April 22, 2012, 02:21:11 PMHe got 8 points more than Mr Fickle got in his last season. Not exactly an earth shattering improvement. Ok, but we still had a much better season overall, and were never going to go down. Also DOL never got three back to back top six finishes and never got us to a Cup Final and Cup Semi, so I find this idea that MON was not much better a little strange.
He got 8 points more than Mr Fickle got in his last season. Not exactly an earth shattering improvement.
Quote from: isamion on April 23, 2012, 08:16:03 AMFrom Daily Express:"MARTIN ONEILL could be heading for a frustrating summer after being told by Sunderland owner Ellis Short that there will be no extensive transfer budget for the Black Cats boss."http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/315941/Afraid-there-ll-be-no-big-spending-Martin-O-NeillWonder what will happen next?Does this mean he won't be buying Collins? Please buy Collins.
You're probably right, but there were plenty of Villa fans who didn't think O'Neill should have been given 10m or whatever it was if the intention was to spunk it on McGeady, and plenty who backed Lerner for making a stand when they realised how high the wages to turnover ratio had risen under O'Neill's regime.
Quote from: TaxDodger on April 23, 2012, 02:26:40 PMQuote from: isamion on April 23, 2012, 08:16:03 AMFrom Daily Express:"MARTIN ONEILL could be heading for a frustrating summer after being told by Sunderland owner Ellis Short that there will be no extensive transfer budget for the Black Cats boss."http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/315941/Afraid-there-ll-be-no-big-spending-Martin-O-NeillWonder what will happen next?Does this mean he won't be buying Collins? Please buy Collins.Why? He's been in good form lately and I'd keep him at the club.
Quote from: John M'Zog on April 23, 2012, 02:31:30 PMQuote from: TaxDodger on April 23, 2012, 02:26:40 PMQuote from: isamion on April 23, 2012, 08:16:03 AMFrom Daily Express:"MARTIN O’NEILL could be heading for a frustrating summer after being told by Sunderland owner Ellis Short that there will be no extensive transfer budget for the Black Cats boss."http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/315941/Afraid-there-ll-be-no-big-spending-Martin-O-NeillWonder what will happen next?Does this mean he won't be buying Collins? Please buy Collins.Why? He's been in good form lately and I'd keep him at the club.Agree.I'd much rather he buy Dunne
Quote from: TaxDodger on April 23, 2012, 02:26:40 PMQuote from: isamion on April 23, 2012, 08:16:03 AMFrom Daily Express:"MARTIN O’NEILL could be heading for a frustrating summer after being told by Sunderland owner Ellis Short that there will be no extensive transfer budget for the Black Cats boss."http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/315941/Afraid-there-ll-be-no-big-spending-Martin-O-NeillWonder what will happen next?Does this mean he won't be buying Collins? Please buy Collins.Why? He's been in good form lately and I'd keep him at the club.
Quote from: isamion on April 23, 2012, 08:16:03 AMFrom Daily Express:"MARTIN O’NEILL could be heading for a frustrating summer after being told by Sunderland owner Ellis Short that there will be no extensive transfer budget for the Black Cats boss."http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/315941/Afraid-there-ll-be-no-big-spending-Martin-O-NeillWonder what will happen next?Does this mean he won't be buying Collins? Please buy Collins.