collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

John McGinn by Rudy Can't Fail
[Today at 03:32:31 AM]


Evann Guessand by Rudy Can't Fail
[Today at 03:28:48 AM]


Emi Martinez by eamonn
[Today at 01:31:20 AM]


Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by tomd2103
[Today at 01:23:25 AM]


Will we qualify for the CL? by Somniloquism
[August 07, 2025, 10:36:42 PM]


Leander Dendoncker by Somniloquism
[August 07, 2025, 10:25:14 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by VillaTim
[August 07, 2025, 10:24:55 PM]


Boxing 2025 by Rory
[August 07, 2025, 10:21:21 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: John McGinn by Rudy Can't Fail
[Today at 03:32:31 AM]


Re: Evann Guessand by Rudy Can't Fail
[Today at 03:28:48 AM]


Re: Emi Martinez by eamonn
[Today at 01:31:20 AM]


Re: Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by tomd2103
[Today at 01:23:25 AM]


Re: John McGinn by Rory
[Today at 01:13:22 AM]


Re: John McGinn by Louzie0
[Today at 12:42:43 AM]


Re: John McGinn by Rory
[Today at 12:23:00 AM]


Re: John McGinn by brontebilly
[Today at 12:07:31 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion  (Read 175045 times)

Offline richard moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 12029
  • Location: Chichester, West Sussex
  • GM : Jan, 2013
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #555 on: April 21, 2012, 08:40:07 AM »
That's because he spent all the money before he left. He knew it would go tits up. That's why he fucked off.

Congratulations on what I feel is a most accurate summation of the situation

Malandro

  • Guest
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #556 on: April 21, 2012, 10:44:23 AM »
That's because he spent all the money before he left. He knew it would go tits up. That's why he fucked off.

Congratulations on what I feel is a most accurate summation of the situation

A more accurate summary would be:

1. American Billionaire owner arrives trying to buy success,
2. Makes grand promises to manager and fans
3. Billionaire owner realises that there are other Billionaires with more money.
4. Pulls plug, loses interest
5. Manager upset, walks out
6. Club end up with shit players, shit manager and absent owner
7. Amercian sells up and buys art work

Offline Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air

  • Member
  • Posts: 11561
  • Location: Upton Park....No, Olympic Stadium....No, Aston Park...Yes that's it,Turf Moor.
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #557 on: April 21, 2012, 11:06:56 AM »
Young niteclubbers were amazed to see Martin O'Neill out on Broad Street last night enjoying a pint. Apparently, one young lady approached O'Neill and said "will you give me your autograph?" "Of course" replied O'Neill "Sign here then," she said and lifted here skirt "on me leg here". So Martin signed, just above her knee where she pointed. Her friends weren't to be outdone by this so the second one said "Me too Martin, sign here" she promptly lifts up her t-shirt. O'Neill of course being a gent duly obliged. The third one then whips off her knickers, points and says "Sign here" showing Martin exactly where to sign his name "Sorry," said O'Neill "I think I signed enough twats when I used to be manager down here"

Offline danlanza

  • Member
  • Posts: 9156
  • Location: Up in the hills overlooking the ocean.
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #558 on: April 21, 2012, 11:09:28 AM »
Young niteclubbers were amazed to see Martin O'Neill out on Broad Street last night enjoying a pint. Apparently, one young lady approached O'Neill and said "will you give me your autograph?" "Of course" replied O'Neill "Sign here then," she said and lifted here skirt "on me leg here". So Martin signed, just above her knee where she pointed. Her friends weren't to be outdone by this so the second one said "Me too Martin, sign here" she promptly lifts up her t-shirt. O'Neill of course being a gent duly obliged. The third one then whips off her knickers, points and says "Sign here" showing Martin exactly where to sign his name "Sorry," said O'Neill "I think I signed enough twats when I used to be manager down here"
Class way to start any Saturday morning.Well funny.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72471
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #559 on: April 21, 2012, 11:16:40 AM »
That's because he spent all the money before he left. He knew it would go tits up. That's why he fucked off.

Congratulations on what I feel is a most accurate summation of the situation

A more accurate summary would be:

1. American Billionaire owner arrives trying to buy success,
2. Makes grand promises to manager and fans
3. Billionaire owner realises that there are other Billionaires with more money.
4. Pulls plug, loses interest
5. Manager upset, walks out
6. Club end up with shit players, shit manager and absent owner
7. Amercian sells up and buys art work

So you think continuing to spend money we didn't have was a viable business model?

Presumably you also think O'Neill was right to fuck off as soon as they asked him to actually try to manage the team he had purchased rather than giving him money to buy a new team again?

Offline Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air

  • Member
  • Posts: 11561
  • Location: Upton Park....No, Olympic Stadium....No, Aston Park...Yes that's it,Turf Moor.
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #560 on: April 21, 2012, 11:20:04 AM »
Martin O'Neill, Alex Mcleish and a dog are sitting in the pub when a man walks in and lifts the dog up in the air and looks underneath it then puts it back down and walks away.

 Alex says to Martin "what the fuck was that all about?" Martin replied "Haven't got a clue" two minutes later another man walks in picks up the dog and looks underneath and then walks out of the pub.

Straight after that another man walks in and lifts it up and looks underneath it and Martin asks "Why the fuck are you looking under the dog?" the man replies "I heard there was a dog in the pub with two arses"

Offline gerags

  • Member
  • Posts: 3530
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #561 on: April 21, 2012, 11:23:13 AM »
He was 4 years into a 5 year plan with half a squad that couldn't challenge past February because he wouldn't play the rest of the squad that he had purchased. Then he wanted to start all over again.
If that's success as a manaager then the bar has been set pretty low.

Offline Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59458
  • Age: 54
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #562 on: April 21, 2012, 11:26:56 AM »
There was no 'five-year plan'. It was a throw-away remark by the previous CEO.

Offline danlanza

  • Member
  • Posts: 9156
  • Location: Up in the hills overlooking the ocean.
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #563 on: April 21, 2012, 11:27:41 AM »
Martin O'Neill, Alex Mcleish and a dog are sitting in the pub when a man walks in and lifts the dog up in the air and looks underneath it then puts it back down and walks away.

 Alex says to Martin "what the fuck was that all about?" Martin replied "Haven't got a clue" two minutes later another man walks in picks up the dog and looks underneath and then walks out of the pub.

Straight after that another man walks in and lifts it up and looks underneath it and Martin asks "Why the fuck are you looking under the dog?" the man replies "I heard there was a dog in the pub with two arses"
Even better haha

Offline villanic

  • Member
  • Posts: 627
  • Location: Soon to be leaving Kingstanding. Thank F**k.
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #564 on: April 21, 2012, 11:32:48 AM »
Martin O'Neill, Alex Mcleish and a dog are sitting in the pub when a man walks in and lifts the dog up in the air and looks underneath it then puts it back down and walks away.

 Alex says to Martin "what the fuck was that all about?" Martin replied "Haven't got a clue" two minutes later another man walks in picks up the dog and looks underneath and then walks out of the pub.

Straight after that another man walks in and lifts it up and looks underneath it and Martin asks "Why the fuck are you looking under the dog?" the man replies "I heard there was a dog in the pub with two arses"

That's brilliant. Going to have to steal that for the pub later.

Malandro

  • Guest
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #565 on: April 21, 2012, 12:25:32 PM »
That's because he spent all the money before he left. He knew it would go tits up. That's why he fucked off.

Congratulations on what I feel is a most accurate summation of the situation

A more accurate summary would be:

1. American Billionaire owner arrives trying to buy success,
2. Makes grand promises to manager and fans
3. Billionaire owner realises that there are other Billionaires with more money.
4. Pulls plug, loses interest
5. Manager upset, walks out
6. Club end up with shit players, shit manager and absent owner
7. Amercian sells up and buys art work

So you think continuing to spend money we didn't have was a viable business model?

Presumably you also think O'Neill was right to fuck off as soon as they asked him to actually try to manage the team he had purchased rather than giving him money to buy a new team again?

You can put words into my mouth if you wish.

The business model was Randy's not O'Neills. I find it odd that he is blamed for wasting money - surely the ultimate sanction is with the chairman? He either thinks its a good idea or not.
Its like asking a child what they want for Christmas and giving them your credit card. (But in this case the manager bought a good team)

The manager actually got us just outside the top 4 in a decent timescale and the majority of the big name signings were huge successes. Perhaps you can argue Habib Beye and the like should never have been on such huge salaries, but how much were the actual transfer fees...

Why he left the club in the manner he did... broken promises.  If you have financial security, its pretty easy to walk.

« Last Edit: April 21, 2012, 12:28:18 PM by Malandro »

Malandro

  • Guest
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #566 on: April 21, 2012, 12:37:46 PM »
I'm not saying that he was the perfect manager, some of his tactics were baffling and he could have found solutions to obvious team weaknesses years earlier.
But to put the blame at his door for a having squad full of high earners is ludicrous.

The club was put in that position because of the owner. The clubs income at the time was very easy to calculate - if he wanted a business model whereby the club paid for itself, he started in a most peculiar fashion.


Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72471
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #567 on: April 21, 2012, 12:40:50 PM »
We had a squad of high earners because O'Neill had a xenophobia that would make Nick Griffin blush. Rather than buy cheap,, promising foreigners he would rather British dross and give them £40,000+ a week to sit on the bench.

As for Lerner shoudln't have sanctioned it... that makes little sense to me. First, you say Lerner broke his promises and cut the spending so O'Neill walked. Then you say, he should have cut the spending... earlier? Make your mind up.

Malandro

  • Guest
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #568 on: April 21, 2012, 12:55:25 PM »
We had a squad of high earners because O'Neill had a xenophobia that would make Nick Griffin blush. Rather than buy cheap,, promising foreigners he would rather British dross and give them £40,000+ a week to sit on the bench.

As for Lerner shoudln't have sanctioned it... that makes little sense to me. First, you say Lerner broke his promises and cut the spending so O'Neill walked. Then you say, he should have cut the spending... earlier? Make your mind up.

Once again words put into my mouth. I said he obviously did sanction it.  I also didn't say he should have cut the spending - he was the owner, he made the choices.
His choice was to come in guns blazing, spend a lot of money and give a lot of promises.

When he decided he couldn't compete, the backing (the vision he fed O'Neill) was taken away.




Offline Greg N'Ash

  • Member
  • Posts: 944
  • Location: birmingham
Re: Return of O'Neill - divided opinion
« Reply #569 on: April 21, 2012, 12:59:09 PM »
That's because he spent all the money before he left. He knew it would go tits up. That's why he fucked off.

Congratulations on what I feel is a most accurate summation of the situation

A more accurate summary would be:

1. American Billionaire owner arrives trying to buy success,
2. Makes grand promises to manager and fans
3. Billionaire owner realises that there are other Billionaires with more money.
4. Pulls plug, loses interest
5. Manager upset, walks out
6. Club end up with shit players, shit manager and absent owner
7. Amercian sells up and buys art work

So you think continuing to spend money we didn't have was a viable business model?

Presumably you also think O'Neill was right to fuck off as soon as they asked him to actually try to manage the team he had purchased rather than giving him money to buy a new team again?

You can put words into my mouth if you wish.

The business model was Randy's not O'Neills. I find it odd that he is blamed for wasting money - surely the ultimate sanction is with the chairman? He either thinks its a good idea or not.
Its like asking a child what they want for Christmas and giving them your credit card. (But in this case the manager bought a good team)

The manager actually got us just outside the top 4 in a decent timescale and the majority of the big name signings were huge successes. Perhaps you can argue Habib Beye and the like should never have been on such huge salaries, but how much were the actual transfer fees...

Why he left the club in the manner he did... broken promises.  If you have financial security, its pretty easy to walk.



You make it sound like Lerner was forcing these players on MON. How many times did he threaten to walk out before they finally closed the purse strings? - I can imagine the reaction at the height of the fan's Saint Martin hysteria if Lerner hadn't agreed to buy Milner for example and MON had walked out. He'll do the same at Sunderland, where it will be "buy who i want or i walk and you'll have 40,000 mackems on your back."

anyway, ignoring all the conspircy theories of why he walked out, i still don't understand why anyone would applaud him for his record at least. The most expensively put together 6th placed team in premiership history and probably world football is hardly something you'd want to thank him for.


 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal