O'Neill should have been potted 5 seconds after walking through the door to ask for the funds to buy Marlon Harewood.
Quote from: Risso on April 11, 2012, 05:21:03 PMO'Neill should have been potted 5 seconds after walking through the door to ask for the funds to buy Marlon Harewood. Ha ha.I know it was horrific at the time, but looking back, days like the day we signed Marlon were utter gold on here.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on April 11, 2012, 05:21:47 PMQuote from: Risso on April 11, 2012, 05:21:03 PMO'Neill should have been potted 5 seconds after walking through the door to ask for the funds to buy Marlon Harewood. Ha ha.I know it was horrific at the time, but looking back, days like the day we signed Marlon were utter gold on here.Up to a point.I remember it well and it was volte faces ahoy, mere days after people were taking the piss and laughing when it seemed he might join the Blues.When it became apparent he was coming here, there were a hell of a lot of posters saying how good he was.
Quote from: John M'Zog on April 11, 2012, 09:54:44 AMQuote from: eastie on April 11, 2012, 09:41:58 AMI do not believe he planned to quit at the time he did to cause maximum damage.Fully agree.I just can't see him sitting in his office in early June checking the calendar as saying "Yep, that'll be about the right time - 5 days to go and that'll really screw 'em up!"What I blame for the timing was the inability of the three men involved, MON, Randy and Faulkner, not te realise the situation wasn't going to work earlier and acting in the best interests of the club. OK, you could argue they tried to make it work, but ultimately it was a mess that cost us.As to his record while here, the money will always be the sticking point. Should he have done more with it? Maybe, but my own criticism, once you can analyse it after the event, is that he could have done the same with less, as evidenced by the amount of players not getting a game and the youth hardly featuring.A good manager with faults. I'll be joining the applause for him. Wasn't the story that he kept trying to have a face-to-face with RL but kept getting one of the stooges? The fact AV paid him a hefty out of court settlement shows there is still much we don't know went on, or didn't go on behind the scenes.
Quote from: eastie on April 11, 2012, 09:41:58 AMI do not believe he planned to quit at the time he did to cause maximum damage.Fully agree.I just can't see him sitting in his office in early June checking the calendar as saying "Yep, that'll be about the right time - 5 days to go and that'll really screw 'em up!"What I blame for the timing was the inability of the three men involved, MON, Randy and Faulkner, not te realise the situation wasn't going to work earlier and acting in the best interests of the club. OK, you could argue they tried to make it work, but ultimately it was a mess that cost us.As to his record while here, the money will always be the sticking point. Should he have done more with it? Maybe, but my own criticism, once you can analyse it after the event, is that he could have done the same with less, as evidenced by the amount of players not getting a game and the youth hardly featuring.A good manager with faults. I'll be joining the applause for him.
I do not believe he planned to quit at the time he did to cause maximum damage.
Not sure about the story but one thing is for sure, judgement passed in favour of one, to the cost of the other, and although both parties said it was amicable it seemed to me that MON came out feeling fully vindicated, even to the point of congratulating his legal team on the great job they had done.As you say we simply don't know what went on, the arbitration board did and they made there decision based on the evidence put in front of them, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realise that if MON had been 100% wrong he would have been found in breach of contract on top of which Villa could have gone after him for massive damages in view of the critical time he left, as far as I'm aware this did not happen, so why didn't it happen because I seem to remember massive vitriol being spewed out by the top dogs at the club like that general bloke and Lerners No2 he really waded into MON getting huge fan support behind them, if they felt that strongly why wouldn't you go after him.The rumour I heard was this (and I stress rumour) MON demanded a severance pay based on the fact that he had been shown the door, the board in turn demanded compensation, it went to arbitration and MON got the money, you make your own minds up as to who won and why.
Quote from: Villanation on April 11, 2012, 07:18:45 PMNot sure about the story but one thing is for sure, judgement passed in favour of one, to the cost of the other, and although both parties said it was amicable it seemed to me that MON came out feeling fully vindicated, even to the point of congratulating his legal team on the great job they had done.As you say we simply don't know what went on, the arbitration board did and they made there decision based on the evidence put in front of them, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realise that if MON had been 100% wrong he would have been found in breach of contract on top of which Villa could have gone after him for massive damages in view of the critical time he left, as far as I'm aware this did not happen, so why didn't it happen because I seem to remember massive vitriol being spewed out by the top dogs at the club like that general bloke and Lerners No2 he really waded into MON getting huge fan support behind them, if they felt that strongly why wouldn't you go after him.The rumour I heard was this (and I stress rumour) MON demanded a severance pay based on the fact that he had been shown the door, the board in turn demanded compensation, it went to arbitration and MON got the money, you make your own minds up as to who won and why.One slight flaw in that theory, there was no tribunal decision.
Quote from: Rip Van Bentfletch on April 11, 2012, 06:15:37 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on April 11, 2012, 05:21:47 PMQuote from: Risso on April 11, 2012, 05:21:03 PMO'Neill should have been potted 5 seconds after walking through the door to ask for the funds to buy Marlon Harewood. Ha ha.I know it was horrific at the time, but looking back, days like the day we signed Marlon were utter gold on here.Up to a point.I remember it well and it was volte faces ahoy, mere days after people were taking the piss and laughing when it seemed he might join the Blues.When it became apparent he was coming here, there were a hell of a lot of posters saying how good he was.That's largely what I was referring to, the volte face thing, plus the slow dawning realisation of what he'd done. I don't even think it was days, by the way - didn't we get wind of Marlon going to see Wigan in the morning ("ha ha, he's shit and he's chosen Wigan ahead of Blues"), then the next thing we knew, he was turning around and heading for Bodymoor Heath?At the time, not massively funny, but looking back far more so.