Quote from: pauliewalnuts on March 21, 2012, 11:29:55 AMNot sure I agree with that, given that he came from a club where stupid wages are the norm (and were before the current lot rolled up, even).If we're paying Heskey 65k a week and we offload him somewhere else who pay him 60k, are they paying the going rate, or are both clubs paying him well over the top?Given the ages and respective abilities of the two players, that's a bit of a misleading argument.He signed for the same wages we were paying Milner and was seen as his direct replacement.
Not sure I agree with that, given that he came from a club where stupid wages are the norm (and were before the current lot rolled up, even).If we're paying Heskey 65k a week and we offload him somewhere else who pay him 60k, are they paying the going rate, or are both clubs paying him well over the top?
I do rate Ireland. He's got ability, but I'd still ell him IF we can get someone more consistent and who can dictate a game more.
Quote from: mattjpa on March 21, 2012, 08:03:45 AMHere's an idea mr Faulkner; let's release a statement saying we are looking to build our squad around people like Ireland and under no circumstances are our star players for sale. Or alternatively we can move him on like we have with Barry, young, Milner, downing.The willingness to sell off the four players you mentioned goes to show that our star players are for sale, and always have been if the price is right.
Here's an idea mr Faulkner; let's release a statement saying we are looking to build our squad around people like Ireland and under no circumstances are our star players for sale. Or alternatively we can move him on like we have with Barry, young, Milner, downing.
Quote from: supertom on March 21, 2012, 12:13:10 PMI do rate Ireland. He's got ability, but I'd still ell him IF we can get someone more consistent and who can dictate a game more.Someone like Robbie Keane?
The only difference to the usual made up crap, is that Ballack's agent has actually stated it as fact that Ireland is going there. Odd move if true.
But there needs to be a line drawn in the sand where we say thats enough.
I don't really see what's been so good about his form. I do appreciate he's put the effort in but for me he's still far too patchy. We need players who can impact over 90 minutes and every week. He's been okay, nothing more. And indeed as someone else mention, it's the end result that matters and he's not scoring or creating enough goals. He's not making enough chances for starters. I also don't appreciate (granted it was hearsay) the fact he may have moaned about his position. If he's got the footballing ability he has he should be able to comfortably instigate play coming in from the left wing. He did play from the left sometimes during his one good season at City.Same goes for N'Zogbia, I don't like the moaning. We're not seeing anywhere near his best, and as is the case with Stephen, it's not all because of how McLeish sets the team out. We've played 4-4-2 this season, 4-5-1, 4-2-31, and correct me if I'm wrong but especially in the case of 4-4-2, footballers have been playing this system since the very beginning. Just play for fucks sake! Will our manager really complain if Ireland decides to drift in field every now and again if he scores a screamer? No. But...you have to impact the game. When our flair players drift out of games after their 20 minute purple patches, then the team do too.I do rate Ireland. He's got ability, but I'd still ell him IF we can get someone more consistent and who can dictate a game more.
The willingness to sell off the four players you mentioned goes to show that our star players are for sale, and always have been if the price is right.
Quote from: Stu on March 21, 2012, 12:00:59 PMQuote from: mattjpa on March 21, 2012, 08:03:45 AMHere's an idea mr Faulkner; let's release a statement saying we are looking to build our squad around people like Ireland and under no circumstances are our star players for sale. Or alternatively we can move him on like we have with Barry, young, Milner, downing.The willingness to sell off the four players you mentioned goes to show that our star players are for sale, and always have been if the price is right.But there needs to be a line drawn in the sand where we say thats enough. It annoys me that totenham have someone in at a high level that can simply say "keep your money, we arent going to be bullied into doing what you want, no matter how much you put down" yet we roll over and get our bellies tickled every time someone throws 8 figures our way. By not selling Modric to Chelsea, totenham have probably got themselves back into the Champions league and got maybe another 30m in revenue they wouldnt have had if they had sold Modric. I know its all ifs and buts, but the knock on effect of that probably involves them keeping Bale, Van Der Vaart, signing Parker, establishing themselves in the top 5-6sides for years to come. If we had the 4players I mentioned still here that could be us. Faulkner is a chump.
Quote from: Stu on March 21, 2012, 12:00:59 PMThe willingness to sell off the four players you mentioned goes to show that our star players are for sale, and always have been if the price is right.absolutely ALL players are for sale if the price is right - even Manure had to sell Ronaldo (C)...