Any money you win by betting against the Villa is dirty, rotten, cursed and forever tainted.Should you ever profit from such an evil act, I'd consider donating the ill-gotten gains to a worthwhile charity.
Just did the BBC predictor. I had it pretty damn damn close. Basically, I thought that just one win, assuming we draw 2-3 more, would do it. The problem is I can only see that win coming against Bolton.I had us losing v Liverpool, man u, Sunderland and norwich. And drawing v Stoke and spurs at home and WBA away.That had us staying up on 39 points, one ahead of QPR.What a thoroughly shit season. Quite a bit worse than last year I reckon. At least then we played some passing football and scored a few goals. This year I reckon 75% of the games have been highly tedious.
'i kept us up' and act the big hero, Villa fans are playing into his hands by banging on about going down
I expect ticket, commercial sales and the general mood and confidence around the club to be appalling in the summer if McLeish is not replaced. This will hit Villa hard financially and would have to be addressed.
Quote from: Mazrim on April 05, 2012, 08:49:37 AMI expect ticket, commercial sales and the general mood and confidence around the club to be appalling in the summer if McLeish is not replaced. This will hit Villa hard financially and would have to be addressed. A lot has been said about calamitous season ticket sales and that the club must act to prevent this, but lets say for argument sake for lose 7000 season ticket holders going into next season, thats a drop in revenue of approx £3,1M. If we sell one of our £60K p/w earners and dont replace him, we save approx £3,1M and thus negate the cost of lost season tickets. The same Noddy maths can be applied to at the gate sales. Lets say that we drop approx 5,000 per match on individual tickets sold. Over the season that would pan out to approx £5M lost revenue. If we sell one of our £70K p/w week earners, we save approx £3,6M and thus take a loss of only £1,4M...... As you can imagine, you only have to get a couple more big earners off the books and not replace them and weve broken even.Now I know that this is pretty basic stuff, but it does go to highlight, that IF the only focus of the club is to reduce cost, then they can more than afford a calamitous drop in supporters turning up at the stadium whilst still ticking over.
Quote from: NeilH on April 05, 2012, 11:29:13 AMQuote from: Mazrim on April 05, 2012, 08:49:37 AMI expect ticket, commercial sales and the general mood and confidence around the club to be appalling in the summer if McLeish is not replaced. This will hit Villa hard financially and would have to be addressed. A lot has been said about calamitous season ticket sales and that the club must act to prevent this, but let’s say for argument sake for lose 7000 season ticket holders going into next season, that’s a drop in revenue of approx £3,1M. If we sell one of our £60K p/w earners and don’t replace him, we save approx £3,1M and thus negate the cost of lost season tickets. The same Noddy maths can be applied to ‘at the gate’ sales. Let’s say that we drop approx 5,000 per match on individual tickets sold. Over the season that would pan out to approx £5M lost revenue. If we sell one of our £70K p/w week earners, we save approx £3,6M and thus take a loss of only £1,4M...... As you can imagine, you only have to get a couple more big earners off the books and not replace them and we’ve broken even.Now I know that this is pretty basic stuff, but it does go to highlight, that IF the only focus of the club is to reduce cost, then they can more than afford a calamitous drop in supporters turning up at the stadium whilst still ticking over.Neil, that overlooks the fact that there's a huge deficit in he accounts that needs to be turned round, and cutting costs is only one half of the equation. There's no point in cutting them if income drops off as well. We undoubtedly needed to cut costs, but we need income to rise as well.
Quote from: Mazrim on April 05, 2012, 08:49:37 AMI expect ticket, commercial sales and the general mood and confidence around the club to be appalling in the summer if McLeish is not replaced. This will hit Villa hard financially and would have to be addressed. A lot has been said about calamitous season ticket sales and that the club must act to prevent this, but let’s say for argument sake for lose 7000 season ticket holders going into next season, that’s a drop in revenue of approx £3,1M. If we sell one of our £60K p/w earners and don’t replace him, we save approx £3,1M and thus negate the cost of lost season tickets. The same Noddy maths can be applied to ‘at the gate’ sales. Let’s say that we drop approx 5,000 per match on individual tickets sold. Over the season that would pan out to approx £5M lost revenue. If we sell one of our £70K p/w week earners, we save approx £3,6M and thus take a loss of only £1,4M...... As you can imagine, you only have to get a couple more big earners off the books and not replace them and we’ve broken even.Now I know that this is pretty basic stuff, but it does go to highlight, that IF the only focus of the club is to reduce cost, then they can more than afford a calamitous drop in supporters turning up at the stadium whilst still ticking over.