'Pleonastic' - was that the period between Cretaceous and Jurassic?
There's no chance of a resignation. He probably thought all his christmases came at once when he landed the Villa job. He'll be hanging on like a stubborn clagnut until pried from this battycrease of a season with a fat pay off all the way to Rangers.
Quote from: dr.chekov on February 29, 2012, 09:47:35 AMThat is a bad letter: hyperbolic, bombastic, inelegant, pleonastic, and badly argued. There was no need for the comma before 'and'.That said, I don't agree with your appraisal of the letter. Unless you were rapping?
That is a bad letter: hyperbolic, bombastic, inelegant, pleonastic, and badly argued.
I'm coming on here every hour praying for a miricale, and reading the headlines "Mcleish and Resignation"" I know it's not going to happen anytime soon but you can but dream.I wouldnt take this decision likely but I'm even at the stage now, where I'd contemplate accepting a defeat at Blackburn in turn for his resignation. But I'm not even sure a defeat at Blackburn would change things?
At the risk of advertising, you can set this kind of thing up :http://www.petitionbuzz.com/Will do a free one - we could see how many signatures it gets? It won't change the clubs mind, but its a marathon not a sprint <insert your own hideous cliche>BTW I want him out - asap. I was worried before about getting someone worse than Houllier, now I'm not bothered as I think we're at rock bottom (ok maybe not Martinez ;-0).
The best part of that letter is the section about no explanation for McLeish's appointment. I still have yet to understand why we went for him. There was no logic to it. It hasn't been explained.
All of that, obviously... but the logic behind it baffled me from day one. If I'd been granted an audience with Paul Faulkner, like that fans group had (and declined), that's what I'd be chatting about. Not in an aggressive way, just genuinely curious and confused.