Quote from: toronto villa on February 02, 2012, 09:04:08 PMQuote from: Risso on February 02, 2012, 08:27:58 PMQuote from: toronto villa on February 02, 2012, 08:25:10 PMno tears here and some more dough off the books. With Hutton, McLeish wanted an attacking full back. Maybe his memory is clouded or Hutton has really regressed, but even he couldn't have imagined Hutton being such a liability defensively.I doubt it's money off the books, we'll have to have paid up his contract.doen't mutual conset mean came to some agreement? Yes, they'll still be on the hook for a good deal of it, but probably not the full amount.Nah. It means they'll have paid his contract off as there's absolutely no point in having him round the place. Why would he accept a pay out when he could have just sat tight for the next 5 months and earned it all anyway? "Mutual agreement" only means a reduced amount in cases like Martin O'Neill's where there's legal action involved.
Quote from: Risso on February 02, 2012, 08:27:58 PMQuote from: toronto villa on February 02, 2012, 08:25:10 PMno tears here and some more dough off the books. With Hutton, McLeish wanted an attacking full back. Maybe his memory is clouded or Hutton has really regressed, but even he couldn't have imagined Hutton being such a liability defensively.I doubt it's money off the books, we'll have to have paid up his contract.doen't mutual conset mean came to some agreement? Yes, they'll still be on the hook for a good deal of it, but probably not the full amount.
Quote from: toronto villa on February 02, 2012, 08:25:10 PMno tears here and some more dough off the books. With Hutton, McLeish wanted an attacking full back. Maybe his memory is clouded or Hutton has really regressed, but even he couldn't have imagined Hutton being such a liability defensively.I doubt it's money off the books, we'll have to have paid up his contract.
no tears here and some more dough off the books. With Hutton, McLeish wanted an attacking full back. Maybe his memory is clouded or Hutton has really regressed, but even he couldn't have imagined Hutton being such a liability defensively.
What a gigantic waste of fucking money.What kind of idiot gives a 32 year old defender a 3 year contract on 40k a week?
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on February 02, 2012, 10:49:40 PMWhat a gigantic waste of fucking money.What kind of idiot gives a 32 year old defender a 3 year contract on 40k a week?If he played him most weeks and he was putting in pre Newcastle injury performances, it would have been better. But for someone who is given only 15 appearances over that time and who most associated with cover for a problematic position when signed, it is atrocious. As I said earlier, he was Seth Johnsoned by MON and Randy by association.
Quote from: Somniloquism on February 02, 2012, 10:59:13 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on February 02, 2012, 10:49:40 PMWhat a gigantic waste of fucking money.What kind of idiot gives a 32 year old defender a 3 year contract on 40k a week?If he played him most weeks and he was putting in pre Newcastle injury performances, it would have been better. But for someone who is given only 15 appearances over that time and who most associated with cover for a problematic position when signed, it is atrocious. As I said earlier, he was Seth Johnsoned by MON and Randy by association.Sorry, what do you mean by Seth Johnsoned?
Went to a wedding on Saturday and was speaking to Mike Jackson [Preson], Kieron Durkan [Wrexham] and Chris Lightfoot [Runcorn, Former PFA Rep]. We were talking about Leeds, and they were saying that when Seth Johnson went into the boardroom to discuss his contract, him and his agent went in saying "Ask for £20,000, settle for £15,000." So they went in, and they were offered £25,000. "WHAT?" Seth Johnson replied, obviously shocked at how good the deal is. Then Ridsdale replied, "Ok then, £35,000" Thinking Johnson was unhappy at the terms.
Sorry, what do you mean by Seth Johnsoned?
It wasn't just Seth Johnson's wages that really shed some light on Peter Ridsdale's time in charge of Leeds. It was bill for the goldfish. Johnson joined from Derby County in 2001. The midfielder had earned a basic wage of around £5,000 a week at Derby and his agent was determined to winkle £13,000 from the then Leeds chairman.Ridsdale, though, had other ideas. Entering the negotiating room he is said to have declared: "Right I'm sorry, I can only offer you £30,000 a week." Sizing up the situation with commendable speed, the agent shook his head in apparent disbelief and said: "No".Ridsdale allegedly responded by saying "Oh, alright then, £37,000." However, Risdale denies this and subsequently said: "We gave Seth Johnson £10,000 less than has been rumoured."
I pity Sunderland.