collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Champions League Contention by eamonn
[Today at 01:34:31 AM]


GUESS THE CROWD R27; Europa Conf🏆SF VILLA v Olympiacos, Thurs 2nd May!🥧 by edgysatsuma89
[Today at 01:33:31 AM]


Other Games - 2023/24 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 12:42:47 AM]


Villa - Arsenal 89-90 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 12:41:33 AM]


Aston Villa 2 Chelsea 2 Post Match Heart Massage. by Ads
[April 28, 2024, 11:47:33 PM]


Douglas Luiz - Confirmed confirmed by PaulWinch again
[April 28, 2024, 11:19:47 PM]


Moussa Diaby - Confirmed by Axl Rose
[April 28, 2024, 11:15:52 PM]


Loanwatch 2023/24 by AV84
[April 28, 2024, 11:09:51 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: 1989-90 season  (Read 10354 times)

Offline hipkiss92

  • Member
  • Posts: 1350
  • Location: Northampton
1989-90 season
« on: January 20, 2012, 08:20:43 PM »
Don't know if anyone can answer this but, when Liverpool were still banned after Heysel for the 90-91 European season,  why didn't we, as runners-up the year before, receive their European Cup place?

Offline Jon Crofts

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21047
  • Location: Lost In The Supermarket
  • GM : PCM
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2012, 08:24:55 PM »
Because all English clubs were banned for 5 years following Heysel.

Offline hipkiss92

  • Member
  • Posts: 1350
  • Location: Northampton
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2012, 08:27:43 PM »
Because all English clubs were banned for 5 years following Heysel.

English clubs were back in for 90-91, which is why we were in the UEFA Cup, but Liverpool had a six year ban so couldn't keep their European Cup place. Why didn't we receive it as runners-up?

Offline preston28

  • Member
  • Posts: 654
  • Location: Preston, South of the Ribble
  • GM : 03.04.2016
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2012, 08:27:49 PM »
Heysel was 1985 and UEFA banned all English clubs from Europe for 5 years?

Offline Exeter 77

  • Member
  • Posts: 7632
  • Location: Back outside the realms of possibility
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2012, 08:28:56 PM »
UEFA wouldn't admit non-champions to the European Cup (when they cared about such things) and we weren't champions.

Offline Exeter 77

  • Member
  • Posts: 7632
  • Location: Back outside the realms of possibility
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2012, 08:31:01 PM »
Because all English clubs were banned for 5 years following Heysel.

English clubs were back in for 90-91, which is why we were in the UEFA Cup, but Liverpool had a six year ban so couldn't keep their European Cup place. Why didn't we receive it as runners-up?

Liverpool originally had a further 3 year ban after English clubs were re-admitted but this was reduced to one (which they had then served) in the summer of 1991.

Offline Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13954
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 07.10.2024
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2012, 08:32:52 PM »
We had two proper competitions then.

Offline preston28

  • Member
  • Posts: 654
  • Location: Preston, South of the Ribble
  • GM : 03.04.2016
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2012, 08:33:48 PM »
Heysel was 1985 and UEFA banned all English clubs from Europe for 5 years?

Because only the winner of the league got into Europe and UEFA didn't allow it to be passed down to the runner up????

Offline Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air

  • Member
  • Posts: 10795
  • Location: Upton Park....No, Olympic Stadium....No, Aston Park...Yes that's it,Turf Moor.
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2012, 08:42:09 PM »
Why should we have been allowed into a competition that was for reigning champions only and the holders ?
Following Heysel in 1985, all English clubs were banned from Europe for 5 years and Liverpool for 6 years. At the end of the ban, as runners up we went into the Uefa Cup as the only English club (instead of the usual 4)  and FA Cup winners Man Utd were in the Cup winners Cup which they won.

I don't remember any great debate or fuss at the time to try and get us in the European Cup. You have to also appreciate at that time English clubs and their fans were seen as the bad boys of Europe, culminating in the Heysel tragedy. It was just good to get some representation back in there and has taken many many more years to restore our image after many other shameful events over the years.     

Offline hawkeye

  • Member
  • Posts: 8973
  • GM : Jun, 2012
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2012, 08:47:11 PM »
English clubs were banned Everton won the league after and were not allowed to play

Offline andyaston

  • Member
  • Posts: 2495
  • Location: Bartley Green
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2012, 08:49:26 PM »
I think it was unfortunate for Everton because they may of won it.

Offline Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air

  • Member
  • Posts: 10795
  • Location: Upton Park....No, Olympic Stadium....No, Aston Park...Yes that's it,Turf Moor.
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #11 on: January 20, 2012, 08:52:37 PM »
I think it was unfortunate for Everton because they may of won it.

However, IMO, the ban on all English clubs at the time was right.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61464
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2025
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #12 on: January 20, 2012, 09:04:05 PM »
Heysel was 1985 and UEFA banned all English clubs from Europe for 5 years?

Because only the winner of the league got into Europe and UEFA didn't allow it to be passed down to the runner up????

Although when Marseille were banned they did offer the European Cup place to the French runner-up.

Conclusion? UEFA are anti-Villa bastards who also switched the legs around against Inter so we'd have the disadvantage of playing away second.

Offline Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air

  • Member
  • Posts: 10795
  • Location: Upton Park....No, Olympic Stadium....No, Aston Park...Yes that's it,Turf Moor.
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #13 on: January 20, 2012, 09:30:17 PM »
Heysel was 1985 and UEFA banned all English clubs from Europe for 5 years?

Because only the winner of the league got into Europe and UEFA didn't allow it to be passed down to the runner up????

Although when Marseille were banned they did offer the European Cup place to the French runner-up.

Conclusion? UEFA are anti-Villa bastards who also switched the legs around against Inter so we'd have the disadvantage of playing away second.

Marseille were banned from a competition called the European Champions League, we were not being allowed into a competition called the European Cup. The existing competition is for clubs finishing as low as 4th in their domestic league, the competiton we won in 1982 was strictly and exclusively for Champions only, in other words every single team you came up against was the very best their country could offer.
If the the likes of Arsenal, Chelsea, Man City do ever eventually win this tournament and claim parity with us - they will still not be able to turn round and say they had to beat reigning Champions in every single round.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61464
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2025
Re: 1989-90 season
« Reply #14 on: January 20, 2012, 09:35:29 PM »
They didn't adopt the rule about non-Champions being allowed in it till a few years after the Marseille ban. Agree with the rest of the post.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal