Quote from: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 10:55:27 PMQuote from: itbrvilla on January 17, 2012, 10:18:29 PMQuote from: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 06:32:23 PMIf the New North Stand became the 'standing' section at Villa Park, would that mean it would replace the Holte as our 'end'? That would be a pity... I'd rather see any standing area down at the Holte End. I'm converting the Holte Lower tier wouldn't be that big of a job. It would.Just to deal with the extra capacity? What was the concourse like in the Old Holte when it was 19,000 capacity? With a standing lower tier I'd imagine the overall capacity of the new Holte would reach what, 16,500 or 17,000? I'm just curious.Young man in my day the Holte capacity was 28,000
Quote from: itbrvilla on January 17, 2012, 10:18:29 PMQuote from: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 06:32:23 PMIf the New North Stand became the 'standing' section at Villa Park, would that mean it would replace the Holte as our 'end'? That would be a pity... I'd rather see any standing area down at the Holte End. I'm converting the Holte Lower tier wouldn't be that big of a job. It would.Just to deal with the extra capacity? What was the concourse like in the Old Holte when it was 19,000 capacity? With a standing lower tier I'd imagine the overall capacity of the new Holte would reach what, 16,500 or 17,000? I'm just curious.
Quote from: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 06:32:23 PMIf the New North Stand became the 'standing' section at Villa Park, would that mean it would replace the Holte as our 'end'? That would be a pity... I'd rather see any standing area down at the Holte End. I'm converting the Holte Lower tier wouldn't be that big of a job. It would.
If the New North Stand became the 'standing' section at Villa Park, would that mean it would replace the Holte as our 'end'? That would be a pity... I'd rather see any standing area down at the Holte End. I'm converting the Holte Lower tier wouldn't be that big of a job.
Cracking picture, adrenachrome. On my titchy screen, I can only make out Chico Hamilton and Andy Lochhead, which would date the pic to between 1970 and 1973 I think.
Quote from: Pete on January 18, 2012, 03:54:25 PMCracking picture, adrenachrome. On my titchy screen, I can only make out Chico Hamilton and Andy Lochhead, which would date the pic to between 1970 and 1973 I think. It looks like it's the Bournemouth game - Feb 1972 and 48,000. I think the other player is Pat McMahon.
Quote from: montague on January 18, 2012, 02:29:39 PMQuote from: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 10:55:27 PMQuote from: itbrvilla on January 17, 2012, 10:18:29 PMQuote from: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 06:32:23 PMIf the New North Stand became the 'standing' section at Villa Park, would that mean it would replace the Holte as our 'end'? That would be a pity... I'd rather see any standing area down at the Holte End. I'm converting the Holte Lower tier wouldn't be that big of a job. It would.Just to deal with the extra capacity? What was the concourse like in the Old Holte when it was 19,000 capacity? With a standing lower tier I'd imagine the overall capacity of the new Holte would reach what, 16,500 or 17,000? I'm just curious.Young man in my day the Holte capacity was 28,000It's likely the Holte would have to come down again (or at least undergo extensive refurbishment) as the gradient of the stand is different for seating and standing, which would require changing not only the stand but the concourse underneath. This is why they're probably considering the corner between the Holte and the Trinity first, before expanding to the North Stand, as this would only cause minor disruptions.
As a History buff I knew that. I chose the 19,000 figure to compare with its last days but if anything you reinforce my point! Surely concourse shouldn't be an issue if the old stand could handle that.
Quote from: montague on January 18, 2012, 02:29:39 PMQuote from: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 10:55:27 PMQuote from: itbrvilla on January 17, 2012, 10:18:29 PMQuote from: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 06:32:23 PMIf the New North Stand became the 'standing' section at Villa Park, would that mean it would replace the Holte as our 'end'? That would be a pity... I'd rather see any standing area down at the Holte End. I'm converting the Holte Lower tier wouldn't be that big of a job. It would.Just to deal with the extra capacity? What was the concourse like in the Old Holte when it was 19,000 capacity? With a standing lower tier I'd imagine the overall capacity of the new Holte would reach what, 16,500 or 17,000? I'm just curious.Young man in my day the Holte capacity was 28,000It was awesome:
Quote from: hipkiss92 on January 18, 2012, 02:57:16 PMQuote from: montague on January 18, 2012, 02:29:39 PMQuote from: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 10:55:27 PMQuote from: itbrvilla on January 17, 2012, 10:18:29 PMQuote from: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 06:32:23 PMIf the New North Stand became the 'standing' section at Villa Park, would that mean it would replace the Holte as our 'end'? That would be a pity... I'd rather see any standing area down at the Holte End. I'm converting the Holte Lower tier wouldn't be that big of a job. It would.Just to deal with the extra capacity? What was the concourse like in the Old Holte when it was 19,000 capacity? With a standing lower tier I'd imagine the overall capacity of the new Holte would reach what, 16,500 or 17,000? I'm just curious.Young man in my day the Holte capacity was 28,000It's likely the Holte would have to come down again (or at least undergo extensive refurbishment) as the gradient of the stand is different for seating and standing, which would require changing not only the stand but the concourse underneath. This is why they're probably considering the corner between the Holte and the Trinity first, before expanding to the North Stand, as this would only cause minor disruptions.I'm not sure whether that's the same for the rail seating used for safe standing. It has to convert to seating for Euro games, and when converted for standing pretty much only one row of people stand between each set of rails. I'm not sure if the Holte is too steep for a fairly straightforward conversion in that style. There'd be a rail at the equivelent of every current row of seating so the risk of tumbling would actually be less than it is now. The thing I am less sure about is the structural load for the increased capacity.
Quote from: amfy on January 18, 2012, 07:32:19 PMQuote from: hipkiss92 on January 18, 2012, 02:57:16 PMQuote from: montague on January 18, 2012, 02:29:39 PMQuote from: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 10:55:27 PMQuote from: itbrvilla on January 17, 2012, 10:18:29 PMQuote from: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 06:32:23 PMIf the New North Stand became the 'standing' section at Villa Park, would that mean it would replace the Holte as our 'end'? That would be a pity... I'd rather see any standing area down at the Holte End. I'm converting the Holte Lower tier wouldn't be that big of a job. It would.Just to deal with the extra capacity? What was the concourse like in the Old Holte when it was 19,000 capacity? With a standing lower tier I'd imagine the overall capacity of the new Holte would reach what, 16,500 or 17,000? I'm just curious.Young man in my day the Holte capacity was 28,000It's likely the Holte would have to come down again (or at least undergo extensive refurbishment) as the gradient of the stand is different for seating and standing, which would require changing not only the stand but the concourse underneath. This is why they're probably considering the corner between the Holte and the Trinity first, before expanding to the North Stand, as this would only cause minor disruptions.I'm not sure whether that's the same for the rail seating used for safe standing. It has to convert to seating for Euro games, and when converted for standing pretty much only one row of people stand between each set of rails. I'm not sure if the Holte is too steep for a fairly straightforward conversion in that style. There'd be a rail at the equivelent of every current row of seating so the risk of tumbling would actually be less than it is now. The thing I am less sure about is the structural load for the increased capacity. It has to convert to seating for Euro game's ??