If we can get 300 we've done well. Anyrthing more would be great. If Monty and Swann get into them again then we could be looking at another victory yet.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on December 13, 2012, 01:41:03 PMKP reckons it's the toughest pitch he's ever played on for scoring shots, that's interesting. It may be the case that 200-5 isn't so bad, and if we can add another 100 on that'd be good.Saw most of the lunch to tea session and echo the thoughts of KP on scoring. If he can't score quickly then, as long as we bowl with discipline, then India shouldn't be able too either. The caveat to that is Sehwag of course, 3/4 hours of him and it's a different ball game.My initial thoughts are we are nothing more than okay with what we have scored. Agree if we can cobble together another 100 or so then that will be reasonable. But the real aspect of this game is that India HAVE to win so you would think they will have to force it. If it's that hard to score on, how long will it take India to get enough runs to get in front and put us under pressure?.All very interesting but I would be a lot more confident with Finn in the team, although from a batting point of view I am now glad that Bresnan is there.
KP reckons it's the toughest pitch he's ever played on for scoring shots, that's interesting. It may be the case that 200-5 isn't so bad, and if we can add another 100 on that'd be good.
Shouldn't you be at work, Tricky!
Quote from: Dave Summers on December 13, 2012, 02:04:32 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on December 13, 2012, 01:41:03 PMKP reckons it's the toughest pitch he's ever played on for scoring shots, that's interesting. It may be the case that 200-5 isn't so bad, and if we can add another 100 on that'd be good.Saw most of the lunch to tea session and echo the thoughts of KP on scoring. If he can't score quickly then, as long as we bowl with discipline, then India shouldn't be able too either. The caveat to that is Sehwag of course, 3/4 hours of him and it's a different ball game.My initial thoughts are we are nothing more than okay with what we have scored. Agree if we can cobble together another 100 or so then that will be reasonable. But the real aspect of this game is that India HAVE to win so you would think they will have to force it. If it's that hard to score on, how long will it take India to get enough runs to get in front and put us under pressure?.All very interesting but I would be a lot more confident with Finn in the team, although from a batting point of view I am now glad that Bresnan is there.Problem is that Bresnan hasn't got runs in ages and his bowling looks pretty ordinary now.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on December 13, 2012, 03:17:36 PMQuote from: Dave Summers on December 13, 2012, 02:04:32 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on December 13, 2012, 01:41:03 PMKP reckons it's the toughest pitch he's ever played on for scoring shots, that's interesting. It may be the case that 200-5 isn't so bad, and if we can add another 100 on that'd be good.Saw most of the lunch to tea session and echo the thoughts of KP on scoring. If he can't score quickly then, as long as we bowl with discipline, then India shouldn't be able too either. The caveat to that is Sehwag of course, 3/4 hours of him and it's a different ball game.My initial thoughts are we are nothing more than okay with what we have scored. Agree if we can cobble together another 100 or so then that will be reasonable. But the real aspect of this game is that India HAVE to win so you would think they will have to force it. If it's that hard to score on, how long will it take India to get enough runs to get in front and put us under pressure?.All very interesting but I would be a lot more confident with Finn in the team, although from a batting point of view I am now glad that Bresnan is there.Problem is that Bresnan hasn't got runs in ages and his bowling looks pretty ordinary now.Out of his last 14 tests Bresnan hasn't batted in half of them. When he does bat he will generally contribute a useful 20 or 30 which isn't bad for a test number 7 or 8. His bowling has lost that zip but he's a workhorse when we need one, just like Hoggard used to be.
Quote from: Villan For Life on December 13, 2012, 03:36:21 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on December 13, 2012, 03:17:36 PMQuote from: Dave Summers on December 13, 2012, 02:04:32 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on December 13, 2012, 01:41:03 PMKP reckons it's the toughest pitch he's ever played on for scoring shots, that's interesting. It may be the case that 200-5 isn't so bad, and if we can add another 100 on that'd be good.Saw most of the lunch to tea session and echo the thoughts of KP on scoring. If he can't score quickly then, as long as we bowl with discipline, then India shouldn't be able too either. The caveat to that is Sehwag of course, 3/4 hours of him and it's a different ball game.My initial thoughts are we are nothing more than okay with what we have scored. Agree if we can cobble together another 100 or so then that will be reasonable. But the real aspect of this game is that India HAVE to win so you would think they will have to force it. If it's that hard to score on, how long will it take India to get enough runs to get in front and put us under pressure?.All very interesting but I would be a lot more confident with Finn in the team, although from a batting point of view I am now glad that Bresnan is there.Problem is that Bresnan hasn't got runs in ages and his bowling looks pretty ordinary now.Out of his last 14 tests Bresnan hasn't batted in half of them. When he does bat he will generally contribute a useful 20 or 30 which isn't bad for a test number 7 or 8. His bowling has lost that zip but he's a workhorse when we need one, just like Hoggard used to be.He hasn't batted that much in Tests, but his ODI and county batting hasn't been up to much. Problem is that a workhorse is ok in a 5 man attack, less so in a 4 man attack. Hopefully he'll get his zip back, but I reckon his elbow is knackered.
I'd have taken 300, but I'm wondering if we're a bit short. Still hopefully we'll get into them.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on December 14, 2012, 08:52:26 AMI'd have taken 300, but I'm wondering if we're a bit short. Still hopefully we'll get into them.Reckon we'll take 5 in the next session.