collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Villa Park Redevelopment by dave.woodhall
[Today at 11:07:50 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by RamboandBruno
[Today at 11:04:56 PM]


Unai Emery by ozzjim
[Today at 11:01:32 PM]


Lovely Mick Dale by Lizz
[Today at 10:19:35 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 10:17:44 PM]


Carabao Cup 2025/26 - 3rd Round Draw by AV82EC
[Today at 10:14:08 PM]


Loanwatch 2025-26 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 09:50:20 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by adrenachrome
[Today at 09:23:37 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: England 2012 Cricket Thread  (Read 332332 times)

Online taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1335 on: August 20, 2012, 02:22:37 PM »
Good leave that Strauss.

This is incredibly poor. I think the time has come for him to hang up his International boots.

He may be a good captain, but he isn't up to test standard as a batsmen any more.

And replace him with who?

Blood someone like Hales, who has a lot of talent.

Strauss Is still a very Good captain, but his form over the last couple of years with the bay isn't up to scratch.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2012, 02:26:38 PM by taylorsworkrate »

Online taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1336 on: August 20, 2012, 02:37:36 PM »
Or perhaps we're just running into better attacks.  Pakistan's strength in their bowling with Ajmal whose a top class spin bowler who causes most players problems while this SA attack is the best they've put out post apartheid.  I think we just dined out on ordinary attacks for a while like Australia and india.

South Africa have been the better team in this series and fully deserve it but we are still a good team with a very good bowling attack - I honestly don't think there's much to choose between these two attacks, maybe we have the upper hand in the spin department and I think if it's swinging we have the edge but if it's flat Philander is their trump card as he's a terrific wicket to wicket bowler who gets good players out.  "

The difference with these two attacks to others in world Cricket is that these two come at you all the time.  England's only one real shocker for the last few years being that 1st Test at the Oval where SA batted superbly.

We've created opportunities to win this Test but needed to survive until stumps entact to give ourselves a chance.  Those last two wickets have done for us.  It would be an amazing win if we can chase these down now against an attack of this quality.

The quality of the SA attack is what makes the way a lot of the batsman get out more annoying. There just seems to be a lack of will to apply themselves.

Online tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15452
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1337 on: August 20, 2012, 02:43:02 PM »
Good leave that Strauss.

This is incredibly poor. I think the time has come for him to hang up his International boots.

He may be a good captain, but he isn't up to test standard as a batsmen any more.

And replace him with who?

Blood someone like Hales, who has a lot of talent.

Strauss Is still a very Good captain, but his form over the last couple of years with the bay isn't up to scratch.

My only concern with blooding a new player is that the next series is in India, which is about as demanding as it gets at test level.  One option could be to move Trott up to opener, but then he would have to be replaced at number 3.  I don't think Strauss should be dropped just yet, but it might be time to relieve him of the burden of the captaincy and allow him to concentrate on his game.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55319
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1338 on: August 20, 2012, 02:48:22 PM »
The big difference is that our players get between 50-70 quite a lot and then get out, but the South Africans go on to make hundreds and big hundreds.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55319
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1339 on: August 20, 2012, 02:55:11 PM »
Also if we'd caught our catches this game would have been very winnable.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55319
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1340 on: August 20, 2012, 03:42:17 PM »
This is so frustrating, if more of the top order had got runs in this match we could have won this.

Offline Dr Butler

  • Member
  • Posts: 5862
  • Location: Duxford, Cambridge.
  • GM : 10.08.2022
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1341 on: August 20, 2012, 03:44:03 PM »
catches win matches, they take theirs.... we spill ours...

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1342 on: August 20, 2012, 03:52:58 PM »
9 catches down this series.Take half of that you are in with a chance.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1343 on: August 20, 2012, 04:19:12 PM »
We couldn't could we?

Offline Rick_avfc

  • Member
  • Posts: 1258
  • Location: Birmingham
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1344 on: August 20, 2012, 04:21:42 PM »
91 runs required when i last checked with Prior and Swann at the crease and we know they can both bat.  Interesting finish.

Offline Bernie

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3843
  • Location: Portishead
  • king of celebrity deathwatch
  • GM : 30.01.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1345 on: August 20, 2012, 04:23:04 PM »
We couldn't could we?
If we don't, it's your fault for even thinking about it

Offline Dr Butler

  • Member
  • Posts: 5862
  • Location: Duxford, Cambridge.
  • GM : 10.08.2022
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1346 on: August 20, 2012, 04:26:10 PM »
new ball in 3 or so overs..........get the runs down to 50 and no more wickets down.....and then just maybe..

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1347 on: August 20, 2012, 04:29:26 PM »
new ball in 3 or so overs..........get the runs down to 50 and no more wickets down.....and then just maybe..
Forgot about the new ball.

Offline Rick_avfc

  • Member
  • Posts: 1258
  • Location: Birmingham
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1348 on: August 20, 2012, 04:30:48 PM »
They are going to win! 

Offline Dr Butler

  • Member
  • Posts: 5862
  • Location: Duxford, Cambridge.
  • GM : 10.08.2022
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #1349 on: August 20, 2012, 04:36:56 PM »
tough ask for Anderson and Finn to make 60 or so between them....

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal