Well regardless he's bowled well today and looked threatening again. They are essentially 209-5, which may well be too much for us any given our appalling batting. However if we can bat decently, I'd say we need them out for less than a lead of 270-280 to stand a chance.
Good one to win anyway, but history suggests it will be too much.There is no doubt that the batters have let themselves down over these last two months and they probably know that themselves better than anyone. However, I do hope we don't go down the route that we took in the 80's and 90's of changing players left, right and centre every other game. We have got to the top by being patient with players and allowing them to work their way out of their bad runs of form. Whenever we discuss possible changes to the batting line up, I always ask, who is their better to come in, than what is there?. Looking around the counties and admittedly I don't see anywhere near as much as I used too, I can't see anything that immediately springs to mind?. The Bairstow's, Roots, Stokes of this world all have potential there is no doubt, but are they really going to get more runs than Strauss, Trott, Bell, KP, Cook etc? Don't see it myself at the moment.The other thing about this game and a few others as well, we have let Sri Lanka off the hook I reckon about 4 times over two innings. When we have our foot on the throat, we need to go for the kill and not let them off. We did it in Cardiff last summer, when we bowled them out in 30 overs, albeit in completely different conditions. This has been a trait of this England team, the ability to kill an innings off and it has been lacking a little this winter.