collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Darren Bent  (Read 168901 times)

Offline Jimmy Smash

  • Member
  • Posts: 411
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #360 on: January 04, 2012, 10:07:13 PM »
Jeans wasn't a bad signing... just an unlucky one. He was certainly worth taking a punt on, given the circumstances.

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29229
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #361 on: January 04, 2012, 10:08:17 PM »
Jeans wasn't a bad signing... just an unlucky one. He was certainly worth taking a punt on, given the circumstances.

I disagree, seeing as he had an injury history which read like a casualty list from the battle of Agincourt.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63369
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #362 on: January 04, 2012, 10:09:07 PM »
Jeans wasn't a bad signing... just an unlucky one. He was certainly worth taking a punt on, given the circumstances.

I disagree, seeing as he had an injury history which read like a casualty list from the battle of Agincourt.

A bit like Paul McGrath & Ronny Johnsen. They worked out.

Offline Jimmy Smash

  • Member
  • Posts: 411
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #363 on: January 04, 2012, 10:10:09 PM »
We didn't pay for him... just covered his wages for a couple of months. Worth a punt... As I said.

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33315
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #364 on: January 04, 2012, 10:10:52 PM »
Jeans wasn't a bad signing... just an unlucky one. He was certainly worth taking a punt on, given the circumstances.

I disagree, seeing as he had an injury history which read like a casualty list from the battle of Agincourt.

A bit like Paul McGrath & Ronny Johnsen. They worked out.


We don't have Jim Walker working miracles anymore.

Offline Jimmy Smash

  • Member
  • Posts: 411
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #365 on: January 04, 2012, 10:11:55 PM »
Jeans wasn't a bad signing... just an unlucky one. He was certainly worth taking a punt on, given the circumstances.

I disagree, seeing as he had an injury history which read like a casualty list from the battle of Agincourt.

A bit like Paul McGrath & Ronny Johnsen. They worked out.


We don't have Jim Walker working miracles anymore.

And sports medicine has moved on 20 years since then.

Offline dicedlam

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #366 on: January 04, 2012, 10:12:13 PM »
How does the next part go.. ' Aston Villa refuse Daren Bent transfer request'

To be followed by  Faulkner ''We did all we could to keep him, but the player wanted out''


I dont think Randy has the stubbornness or arrogance to care anymore in telling Liverpool to do one


what would you rather have them say so as not raise your level of anger or scepticism?

I would like for a start Lerner to come out and say the way it is.



Which you'd still dismiss as spin, or "we've heard that before". Even if he was telling the truth, would you believe it, and more importantly would you want to hear it?


Since when have you become a mind reader and know how I would react?

I'm stating that it would be good to hear from our chaiman once in awhile on club matters.

..and just for you TV, yes I would believe him.

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33315
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #367 on: January 04, 2012, 10:12:55 PM »
We didn't pay for him... just covered his wages for a couple of months. Worth a punt... As I said.

We have paid him since August, I don't think we have had 500 mins from him.

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33315
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #368 on: January 04, 2012, 10:14:57 PM »
Jeans wasn't a bad signing... just an unlucky one. He was certainly worth taking a punt on, given the circumstances.

I disagree, seeing as he had an injury history which read like a casualty list from the battle of Agincourt.

A bit like Paul McGrath & Ronny Johnsen. They worked out.


We don't have Jim Walker working miracles anymore.

And sports medicine has moved on 20 years since then.

And Jenas has been out for how long over the last 5 years?

Offline Jimmy Smash

  • Member
  • Posts: 411
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #369 on: January 04, 2012, 10:16:07 PM »
We didn't pay for him... just covered his wages for a couple of months. Worth a punt... As I said.

We have paid him since August, I don't think we have had 500 mins from him.

If we'd paid £5M for him I'd have been annoyed... but as we didn't I'm not too bothered. We've paid out a great deal more for bigger crocks over the years.

Offline kp5031

  • Member
  • Posts: 3
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #370 on: January 04, 2012, 10:20:20 PM »
poor display interms of effort no runs off the ball across the back line offered nothing as a outlet and closing down from the front plays someone who plays like he wonts to be there

Offline Jimmy Smash

  • Member
  • Posts: 411
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #371 on: January 04, 2012, 10:24:58 PM »
poor display interms of effort no runs off the ball across the back line offered nothing as a outlet and closing down from the front plays someone who plays like he wonts to be there

In the one or two games he had post lay off. He never really got his chance.

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33315
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #372 on: January 04, 2012, 10:32:26 PM »
We didn't pay for him... just covered his wages for a couple of months. Worth a punt... As I said.

We have paid him since August, I don't think we have had 500 mins from him.

If we'd paid £5M for him I'd have been annoyed... but as we didn't I'm not too bothered. We've paid out a great deal more for bigger crocks over the years.

I understand, but we had to loan out another midfielder to be able to get Jenas in. So we could have done without gambling on a crock for that.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #373 on: January 04, 2012, 10:33:00 PM »
Jeans wasn't a bad signing... just an unlucky one. He was certainly worth taking a punt on, given the circumstances.

I disagree, seeing as he had an injury history which read like a casualty list from the battle of Agincourt.

A bit like Paul McGrath & Ronny Johnsen. They worked out.

One world class and one excellent defender, well worth taking a punt on.  Jenas is an average midfielder at best.  So not exactly 'a bit like' and more 'nothing like'.

Offline Jimmy Smash

  • Member
  • Posts: 411
Re: Darren Bent
« Reply #374 on: January 04, 2012, 10:36:08 PM »
We didn't pay for him... just covered his wages for a couple of months. Worth a punt... As I said.

We have paid him since August, I don't think we have had 500 mins from him.

If we'd paid £5M for him I'd have been annoyed... but as we didn't I'm not too bothered. We've paid out a great deal more for bigger crocks over the years.

I understand, but we had to loan out another midfielder to be able to get Jenas in. So we could have done without gambling on a crock for that.

The one we still haven't given a first team game to, you mean?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal