Quote from: Rick_avfc on January 04, 2012, 04:10:08 PMQuote from: Villafirst on January 04, 2012, 04:01:20 PMLerner lost interest last summer by selling Young and Downing and pocketing 90% of the proceeds and not re-investing in the team to the extent needed. I can't see the point of Lerner's tenure anymore - he won't back the Manager with money unless AM sells first. So if Bent goes we will have an even weaker team which will only go one way. Lerner barely attends games anymore - his interest is only in what he can now salvage from his initial input. I know it's easier said than done, but I wish a proper investor would take over and put some enthusiasm back into the club - I get pissed off with his silence all the time. Bright future???....I just had a thought about Lerner. Could he be preparing to sell? I know this has been mentioned somewhere else before but with everything thats going on - selling players and not re-investing, reducing wage bill, talk of getting the books in order for FFP (yeh right), could these be the tell tale signs that he is looking to sell up to a potential buyer? He wants the books in order right? could mean that potential buyers might see very little debt as a good investment. just a thought. The likelihood is that he wont sell and let us hover above relegation for the foreseeable futureSurely having some decent players already at the club would help in a sale ?
Quote from: Villafirst on January 04, 2012, 04:01:20 PMLerner lost interest last summer by selling Young and Downing and pocketing 90% of the proceeds and not re-investing in the team to the extent needed. I can't see the point of Lerner's tenure anymore - he won't back the Manager with money unless AM sells first. So if Bent goes we will have an even weaker team which will only go one way. Lerner barely attends games anymore - his interest is only in what he can now salvage from his initial input. I know it's easier said than done, but I wish a proper investor would take over and put some enthusiasm back into the club - I get pissed off with his silence all the time. Bright future???....I just had a thought about Lerner. Could he be preparing to sell? I know this has been mentioned somewhere else before but with everything thats going on - selling players and not re-investing, reducing wage bill, talk of getting the books in order for FFP (yeh right), could these be the tell tale signs that he is looking to sell up to a potential buyer? He wants the books in order right? could mean that potential buyers might see very little debt as a good investment. just a thought. The likelihood is that he wont sell and let us hover above relegation for the foreseeable future
Lerner lost interest last summer by selling Young and Downing and pocketing 90% of the proceeds and not re-investing in the team to the extent needed. I can't see the point of Lerner's tenure anymore - he won't back the Manager with money unless AM sells first. So if Bent goes we will have an even weaker team which will only go one way. Lerner barely attends games anymore - his interest is only in what he can now salvage from his initial input. I know it's easier said than done, but I wish a proper investor would take over and put some enthusiasm back into the club - I get pissed off with his silence all the time. Bright future???....
I think Bent will go before the end of the month - Lerner probably thinks the team can avoid relegation without Bent so he'll recoup another £25M of his outlay.....there's a term for this - asset stripping!
Quote from: Villafirst on January 04, 2012, 04:16:23 PMI think Bent will go before the end of the month - Lerner probably thinks the team can avoid relegation without Bent so he'll recoup another £25M of his outlay.....there's a term for this - asset stripping!Is Lerner becoming the new Mike Ashley?
From what I've heard Bent is going to Liverpool without fail.
Not for sale
Quote from: John M'Zog on January 04, 2012, 12:40:19 PMQuote from: old man villa fan on January 04, 2012, 12:10:14 AMI would like us to try something new and radical and play without the wide players, having a sitting midfield player (Clark), 2 in the middle (Petrov and Bannan/N'Zogbia) and an advanced player (Ireland). This does not mean we do not use the wide areas but move into them rather than have players already in them. I think this would get the best out of Gabby and Bent playing together as twin strikers and allowing them to move all across the front line and interchange.That pretty much amounts to a diamond in midfield, which we played against Wigan and worked quite well. As I'd see it, the bottom of the diamond would be Petrov, Clark or Herd, the middle two would be from Bannan, Albrighton or Delph and the top of the diamond would be Ireland or N'Zogbia. The way it seemed to work was Gabby had a bit of freedom to use the width, with Bent staying central. Bannan played that day and did very well, IMO.I've said before that CNZ may be better more central for us, so if super Marc can adjust to it then it may be a winning formation for us. And it also allows Clark to move back to CB.Presuming everyone is fit:- GivenHutton - Clark - Dunne - Warnock Petrov Albrighton - Bannan N'Zogbia Bent - GabbyNot needing Clark in midfield also allows us to switch the back around a bit, as he could play LB with Carlos in the centre if he doesn't take Hutton's RB slot. Could keep them on their toes back there at least! Sorry but that midlfield would get walked over by any decent team and the defence would have to HOOF to get any kind of release from the pressure. Ooh...
Quote from: old man villa fan on January 04, 2012, 12:10:14 AMI would like us to try something new and radical and play without the wide players, having a sitting midfield player (Clark), 2 in the middle (Petrov and Bannan/N'Zogbia) and an advanced player (Ireland). This does not mean we do not use the wide areas but move into them rather than have players already in them. I think this would get the best out of Gabby and Bent playing together as twin strikers and allowing them to move all across the front line and interchange.That pretty much amounts to a diamond in midfield, which we played against Wigan and worked quite well. As I'd see it, the bottom of the diamond would be Petrov, Clark or Herd, the middle two would be from Bannan, Albrighton or Delph and the top of the diamond would be Ireland or N'Zogbia. The way it seemed to work was Gabby had a bit of freedom to use the width, with Bent staying central. Bannan played that day and did very well, IMO.I've said before that CNZ may be better more central for us, so if super Marc can adjust to it then it may be a winning formation for us. And it also allows Clark to move back to CB.Presuming everyone is fit:- GivenHutton - Clark - Dunne - Warnock Petrov Albrighton - Bannan N'Zogbia Bent - GabbyNot needing Clark in midfield also allows us to switch the back around a bit, as he could play LB with Carlos in the centre if he doesn't take Hutton's RB slot. Could keep them on their toes back there at least!
I would like us to try something new and radical and play without the wide players, having a sitting midfield player (Clark), 2 in the middle (Petrov and Bannan/N'Zogbia) and an advanced player (Ireland). This does not mean we do not use the wide areas but move into them rather than have players already in them. I think this would get the best out of Gabby and Bent playing together as twin strikers and allowing them to move all across the front line and interchange.