collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by jwarry
[Today at 05:21:54 PM]


Leon Bailey by Mister E
[Today at 05:18:17 PM]


FFP by Russ aka Big Nose
[Today at 04:54:16 PM]


Unai Emery by Smirker
[Today at 04:09:44 PM]


Jacob Ramsey - Gone by frankmosswasmyuncle
[Today at 03:50:11 PM]


The week in claret and blue by Legion
[Today at 03:40:48 PM]


Tyrone Mings by Toronto Villa
[Today at 02:56:31 PM]


Damian Vidagany - Director of Football by Hookeysmith
[Today at 02:51:57 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread  (Read 717988 times)

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15175
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2535 on: January 18, 2012, 01:14:54 PM »
Yes, that will obviously effect funds for players if we are 'living within our means'. 

My opinion on what Randy's intentions are, once the wagebill is where we want, remain the same - let's wait and see!

Offline monkeyboy

  • Member
  • Posts: 133
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2536 on: January 18, 2012, 01:40:50 PM »
They said the club has to live on its own means.

Why would that only involve the wage bill?

I can only recall statements about the wage bill. We'll see in due course but I expect them to invest with a plan to improve revenue but with it all having to operate within a strict wage  structure.

Welcome to our new home - it's known as mid table and is in the suburb of mediocrity

Offline UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42867
  • Location: Forest of Dean & Fenway Park
  • GM : 10.02.2026
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2537 on: January 18, 2012, 01:44:45 PM »
They said the club has to live on its own means.

Why would that only involve the wage bill?



I can only recall statements about the wage bill. We'll see in due course but I expect them to invest with a plan to improve revenue but with it all having to operate within a strict wage  structure.

Welcome to our new home - it's known as mid table and is in the suburb of mediocrity

"New" home ?

Villa have been mid-table for years (finishing 6th doesn't exactly count as challenging at the top)
« Last Edit: January 19, 2012, 08:07:12 AM by UK Redsox »

Offline Merv

  • Member
  • Posts: 4192
  • Location: Undercover
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2538 on: January 18, 2012, 01:52:28 PM »
They said the club has to live on its own means.

Why would that only involve the wage bill?

I don't think it will. I'm sure there is a drive to bring the wage bill down, but no-one's telling me that there's a £15m pot of transfer spend available - McLeish can use it for fees only and not wages for a player he signs? No.

I don't think we'll see the remaining £££ from the Downing/Young sales again, it's been used elsewhere. We'll probably be able to spend what we generate from sales in the summer, and nothing more.

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15175
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2539 on: January 18, 2012, 01:52:50 PM »
"New" home ?

Villa have been mid-table for years (finishing 6th doesn't exactly count as challenging at the top)

Personally I class 6th as above mid table, mainly as it usually brings a European place with it.  It's subjective, but I'd say 8th to about 14th is 'mid table'.

Offline TheSandman

  • Member
  • Posts: 34781
  • Age: 34
  • Location: The seaside town that they forgot to bomb
  • GM : May, 2013
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2540 on: January 18, 2012, 03:05:59 PM »
Our wagebill is still above the recommended level of 50% of turnover now and the departures of Cuellar, Heskey and Beye in the summer still won't see it fall below that so I don't foresee much additional spending in the summer (especially as Cuellar and Heskey will most likely need replacing as we'll be short of strikers and centre halves).

Offline hipkiss92

  • Member
  • Posts: 1361
  • Location: Northampton
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2541 on: January 18, 2012, 04:07:07 PM »
I know it's not the best financial policy, but whatever happened to 'speculate to accumulate'? Instead of reigning in the money available so that McLeish has no room to maneuver, why don't they give say, 10/12 million and see what he can do with it?

Offline TimTheVillain

  • Member
  • Posts: 4447
  • Location: Location
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2542 on: January 18, 2012, 04:26:13 PM »
I know it's not the best financial policy, but whatever happened to 'speculate to accumulate'? Instead of reigning in the money available so that McLeish has no room to maneuver, why don't they give say, 10/12 million and see what he can do with it?

That's the $64 million dollar question.

Well, not quite, but you know what I mean.

As I see it, Randy's cheque book is firmly closed now, so we have to wheel and deal - beg, steal or borrow ( and sell).

This new wages to income ratio is a big issue at VP, they certainly like to point it out a lot, more so than any other club, when is it coming into force, how are the likes of Spurs getting round it ? - Their wage bill doesn't appear to be going downwards.

Oh the joys of supporting a 'middle table with no cash' club again !!


« Last Edit: January 18, 2012, 04:35:26 PM by TimTheVillain »

Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2543 on: January 18, 2012, 05:26:24 PM »
Randy did take a big punt last season on Darren Bent. In fairness even he was sensible enough to weigh up the cost of relegation against 24 million on DB. I just don't see him doing the same thing again. He probably feels we're safe enough not to have to speculate to consolodate. Maybe that or even if we were really in the shit right now, he couldn't afford to do it again.

I know we sold Downing and Young, which kind of covered the Bent sale, but we couldn't have been entirely sure back then, just what a weasly, money grabbing fox hunt Downing was.

We should really speculate to accumulate, but I can't see Randy doing that again. He took us as far as we could go, without getting enough back to warrant all the expenditure. I see that he's trying to make us a viable business, and probably to sell. Perhaps Randy feels a mid table club that stays in the black, is better than a top six club that loses money every year. That might be wrong, it might not. Perhaps any rich Arabs sniffing around us 2 years ago, have caught another scent whilst we've bombed down to mediocrity.

Or to cut a long one short. We aint signing any one!

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2544 on: January 18, 2012, 05:43:27 PM »
If we was in the bottom 3 would Randy be splashing the cash?

Offline TimTheVillain

  • Member
  • Posts: 4447
  • Location: Location
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2545 on: January 18, 2012, 06:09:16 PM »
If we was in the bottom 3 would Randy be splashing the cash?

Interesting question - I think we'd be buying more 'has beens' in on short term contracts in the hope that they'd save us.

Offline CJ

  • Member
  • Posts: 7888
  • Age: 71
  • Location: Downtown Cookley
  • GM : 12.07.2017
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2546 on: January 18, 2012, 07:02:12 PM »
If we was in the bottom 3 would Randy be splashing the cash?

Difficult to say. Last season it was straightforward - we had 2 wingers getting balls into the box and creating loads of chances but no-one to stick them away, so identifying the solution and getting the player was fairly obvious. This season I'm not sure we could identify any realistic single player who'd turn us round, and given that I don't think we'll be getting anyone in.

Offline Irish villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 8526
  • Age: 39
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2547 on: January 18, 2012, 07:31:30 PM »
I wouldn't call sixth mid-table. Those years we finished sixth we were within a few points of being fourth and spent time within the top 4. Weren't we title contenders in 08/09 at Christmas? We were where Spurs are now.....

Offline ROBBO

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7776
  • Location: MELBOURNE
  • GM : 15.01.2026
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2548 on: January 18, 2012, 08:19:31 PM »
So after six years we are no better than we were under deadly, probably worse because at least he knew more about running a club than the lot we have now. Not that i'm advocating his return mind you.

Offline richard moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 12029
  • Location: Chichester, West Sussex
  • GM : Jan, 2013
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2549 on: January 19, 2012, 08:04:02 AM »
I wouldn't call sixth mid-table. Those years we finished sixth we were within a few points of being fourth and spent time within the top 4. Weren't we title contenders in 08/09 at Christmas? We were where Spurs are now.....

Technically, I think you are right though it kinda feels that way. I think of it more as the 'best of the rest', the rest being a very long tail of very ordinary fare. And of course it comes with the seemingly poisoned chalace of the Europa League

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal