NRC did nothing to warrant being paid £40k a week for 3 years, thought he was better than what he actually is & is now plying his trade at the mighty Bolton. A few decent performances at the end of the season didn't warrant him being offered a new contract.
I prefer Herd to Reo-Coker. At least can occasionally pass the ball to a fellow Villa player. I wouldn't have given Reo-Coker a new deal. He didn't justify the £20mil in Transfer fee and wages that we probably spent on him anyway.
I always liked Reo-Coker, I make no apology for that. But I don't believe McLeish decided not to keep him - surely the timescales bear that out - and I'm pretty certain that NRC was offered a new deal, earlier in the season, and declined it.There's plenty of things to grumble about with regards to the club at the moment, but NRC leaving at the end of his contract isn't one of them.
Quote from: Merv on December 13, 2011, 09:59:48 AMI always liked Reo-Coker, I make no apology for that. But I don't believe McLeish decided not to keep him - surely the timescales bear that out - and I'm pretty certain that NRC was offered a new deal, earlier in the season, and declined it.There's plenty of things to grumble about with regards to the club at the moment, but NRC leaving at the end of his contract isn't one of them.Agree with all of this.I was a fan of him in the holding role, but he wanted too much cash to stay so he left.
Ever present in Bolton Midfield. Bolton bottom of the league. Says it all. Average player, although for some bizarre reason I kinda liked him.
It pretty depressing to think that such an average footballer must have cost the club 15-20 million for his 4 years here.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on December 13, 2011, 03:33:55 PMIt pretty depressing to think that such an average footballer must have cost the club 15-20 million for his 4 years here.That's what average players cost these days.