collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by PaulWinch again
[Today at 02:08:06 PM]


Jacob Ramsey by PaulWinch again
[Today at 02:06:42 PM]


Games Moved for TV by rob_bridge
[Today at 02:02:37 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by eamonn
[Today at 02:01:40 PM]


Aston Villa vs Newcastle pre-match thread by eamonn
[Today at 01:57:48 PM]


Evann Guessand by Somniloquism
[Today at 01:57:03 PM]


Francesco Calvo - President of Business Operations by rob_bridge
[Today at 01:52:37 PM]


Emi Buendia by eamonn
[Today at 12:55:05 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by PaulWinch again
[Today at 02:08:06 PM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by PaulWinch again
[Today at 02:06:42 PM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by Paul.S
[Today at 02:02:39 PM]


Re: Games Moved for TV by rob_bridge
[Today at 02:02:37 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by eamonn
[Today at 02:01:40 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Sdwbvf
[Today at 01:57:51 PM]


Re: Aston Villa vs Newcastle pre-match thread by eamonn
[Today at 01:57:48 PM]


Re: Evann Guessand by Somniloquism
[Today at 01:57:03 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Randy Lerner - Discuss  (Read 119690 times)

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74536
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #225 on: December 19, 2011, 10:54:45 PM »
And let's not forget we didn't have a choice.

Yes we did. If enough shareholders had turned down the offer he couldn't have compulsorily have bought them. And please let's not pretend that more than a handful of us didn't sell with pleasure.

What was the percentage owned by Doug and cabal, and the percentage needed to trigger a compulsory sale?

Not that it makes any difference, because some shareholders, whether they wanted to or not, were forced to sell their shares.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63328
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #226 on: December 19, 2011, 10:56:39 PM »
And let's not forget we didn't have a choice.

Yes we did. If enough shareholders had turned down the offer he couldn't have compulsorily have bought them. And please let's not pretend that more than a handful of us didn't sell with pleasure.

What was the percentage owned by Doug and cabal, and the percentage needed to trigger a compulsory sale?

Not that it makes any difference, because some shareholders, whether they wanted to or not, were forced to sell their shares.

Doug owned about 38%, the trigger was 90, I believe. But the point I'm making is that just about everyone gladly sold their shares so to make out it was some great unpopular and dictatorial move is wrong. 

Offline itbrvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 7402
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : 16.02.2022
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #227 on: December 19, 2011, 11:15:30 PM »
I thought they had no choice?

Offline PeterWithe

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10739
  • Location: Birmingham.
  • GM : 05.03.2026
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #228 on: December 19, 2011, 11:15:54 PM »
Lerner has always seemed to try to do right by us fans, I think a lot of what has gone wrong could have been avoided with another experienced CEO. I mean how much do they earn? Half a million a year? I'd rather we tried a different man in that role before trying to drive Lerner out.

This is what I don't understand.  Lerner will fork out £65K a week for somebody like Heskey, but when it comes to running the club he appoints a customer services manager from his credit card company.

Bloke I know with contacts reckons less than £300k, less than a quarter of Herd's new contract.

We must have pissed millions up the wall on wages for players who have proved themselves unable to achieve what is needed but we wont replace a fella whos arrival seemed to coincide with us going downhill faster than Franz Klammer and who earns the same as the youth team keeper.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63328
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #229 on: December 19, 2011, 11:17:13 PM »
I thought they had no choice?

They had to sell once 90% (or whatever the figure was) was reached. If it wasn't reached they wouldn't have had to sell. But to repeat again, the overwhelming majority of those who sold did so willingly.

Offline Mazrim

  • Member
  • Posts: 21173
  • Location: Hall Green.
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #230 on: December 20, 2011, 01:26:01 AM »
Of course they did and they'd do so again now if it was Lerner as major shareholder and say, the Qatari royal family or that really rich French bloke coming in.

Offline MarkM

  • Member
  • Posts: 3059
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #231 on: December 20, 2011, 08:42:59 AM »
Sir Graham Taylor as CEO. Either that or someone like Triple H so he can kick some ass in that board room ;)

Agree, good shout for Sir Graham Taylor. He knows how to organise and get discipline back into the club - if you rewind to 1987 when he was quoted as saying ''the club is a shambles'' - just like it is now. Get him and Ian Taylor in - men with real heart for the club - not some twat from across the pond who turns up when he feels like it. Just wish I still had my shares - this jerk bought them lock sock and barrel in 2006 and can do what the fuck he likes.

And let's not forget that just about everyone was falling over themselves to sell their shares to him.

I was'nt, and I did'nt

I never cashed any payment for them and ignored the letters.

Not that I was against the sale, I was just against my few shares being forced sold. I liked owning a little of my club

Offline Chico Hamilton III

  • Member
  • Posts: 19657
  • Location: South London
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #232 on: December 20, 2011, 09:16:06 AM »
Quote
I was'nt, and I did'nt

I never cashed any payment for them and ignored the letters.


Me too.

Offline PaulTheVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 23878
  • GM : 16.08.2022
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #233 on: December 20, 2011, 11:07:39 AM »

Offline Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59468
  • Age: 54
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #234 on: December 20, 2011, 11:13:06 AM »
They could at least make the effort to spell words correctly.

disappointing
could have (not of)
nowhere (not no where)
an (not and)
immediately
vein (not vain)
never have (not of)
uninspiring
overseeing

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36431
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #235 on: December 20, 2011, 11:24:31 AM »
Quote
I was'nt, and I did'nt

I never cashed any payment for them and ignored the letters.


Same here, I even had a letter from Capita last week offering to sell them for me at a price.

Me too.

Offline villajk

  • Member
  • Posts: 14763
  • Location: Knowle in Birmingham, B93
  • GM : June, 2013
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #236 on: December 20, 2011, 11:28:45 AM »
Quote
I was'nt, and I did'nt

I never cashed any payment for them and ignored the letters.


Same here, I even had a letter from Capita last week offering to sell them for me at a price.

Me too.

Same here.  In fact I recently received communication requesting I complete a form and send it back with my shares.

Filed in the bin.

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36431
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #237 on: December 20, 2011, 11:31:19 AM »
They could at least make the effort to spell words correctly.

disappointing
could have (not of)
nowhere (not no where)
an (not and)
immediately
vein (not vain)
never have (not of)
uninspiring
overseeing

Pitiful, they also repeat the 2 relegations in 3 seasons claim that everyone seems to have accepted as fact when it was over 4 years (relegation, promotion, 9th, cup win and relegation). You'd think they'd have asked some grown ups to help them before going public.

Online KevinGage

  • Member
  • Posts: 14104
  • Location: Singing from under the floorboards
  • GM : 20.09.20
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #238 on: December 20, 2011, 11:41:20 AM »
Lerner has always seemed to try to do right by us fans, I think a lot of what has gone wrong could have been avoided with another experienced CEO. I mean how much do they earn? Half a million a year? I'd rather we tried a different man in that role before trying to drive Lerner out.

This is what I don't understand.  Lerner will fork out £65K a week for somebody like Heskey, but when it comes to running the club he appoints a customer services manager from his credit card company.

Bloke I know with contacts reckons less than £300k, less than a quarter of Herd's new contract.

We must have pissed millions up the wall on wages for players who have proved themselves unable to achieve what is needed but we wont replace a fella whos arrival seemed to coincide with us going downhill faster than Franz Klammer and who earns the same as the youth team keeper.

Whist we're on the subject of pissing millions away, the appointment of McLeish has had the entirely predictable result of driving down gates. 

Never a great thing to to at the best of times.  But in the current climate -and with making that Deloitte 20 list a stated aim of the club-  it's even more hatstand.

Most home games this season have been a minimum of 5000 down on what we might usually expect.  So 5000 at an average ticket price of £30 = approx £150k  down per home game.  Spread over the season  (if McLeish is to last that long -and if gates don't plummet further)  and that's just under £2.5 million down for league games alone.

Offline Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59468
  • Age: 54
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Re: Randy Lerner - Discuss
« Reply #239 on: December 20, 2011, 11:56:12 AM »
They could at least make the effort to spell words correctly.

disappointing
could have (not of)
nowhere (not no where)
an (not and)
immediately
vein (not vain)
never have (not of)
uninspiring
overseeing

Pitiful, they also repeat the 2 relegations in 3 seasons claim that everyone seems to have accepted as fact when it was over 4 years (relegation, promotion, 9th, cup win and relegation). You'd think they'd have asked some grown ups to help them before going public.

Site done by Chris Hearn.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal