What confuses me is doing it and then not backing him in the market. It was blindingly obvious that it would take a lot for him to win some supporters over, yet he was expected do that on a relative shoestring?
Quote from: John M'Zog on December 19, 2011, 11:05:32 AMWhat confuses me is doing it and then not backing him in the market. It was blindingly obvious that it would take a lot for him to win some supporters over, yet he was expected do that on a relative shoestring? That's true enough.McLeish is a manager of proven low quality, and I understand him taking the job (3m a year?), but he was on to a loser from the start.This is an appointment which was never, ever going to work out.What frightens me is something someone said to me yesterday - the though that actually, Randy and co don't even realise how badly the situation is going.
I cannot however fathom the decision to appoint McLeish, it defies belief. Just what went through his head when he decided, McLeish is the man for the job, he relegated Small Heath twice in 3 seasons, he'll bring stability & Sir Alex thinks he's a good bloke.
Mr. Lerner is an oddball owner. Compare Villa to the NFL - his Cleveland Browns have a history of periennial underperformance, a succession of poor appointments at head coach, poor draft record and now he has appointed as Chief Exec who is an ageing ex -NFL head coach (who has won the superbowl with the packer) to oversee things whilst he is away. Oh and the fans do not like their owner much either. So what has happened to the Browns is happening at VP except the fans I guess still haven't turned against him in the majority. I really can't see what plan Mr. Lerner has for the Villa now - he is currently 'fiddling whilst Villa Park burns'.............