Faulkner will never have an easier interview. Pity there weren't a few difficult questions. Faulkner was fed and then endorsed. Hardly investigative reporting was it. Very poor, but BRMB has it's audience of course.
Quote from: Simba on November 24, 2011, 01:50:53 PMFaulkner will never have an easier interview. Pity there weren't a few difficult questions. Faulkner was fed and then endorsed. Hardly investigative reporting was it. Very poor, but BRMB has it's audience of course.and Tom Ross wants to be "respected " by the Club hierarchy so he protects his credibility by sitting on the ineffective stool.
My one other gripe is the mindset "when Man Utd come calling there is little anyone can do" (which Tom Ross came up with and PF quietly agreed with.) The culture at Villa Park, the mindset, has to be we are second to no other club. When Man Utd come calling tell them to do one...even better, tell them to put the kettle on because WE are going to be calling around to them. Please Randy, PF and Villa: No more small-time thinking at Birmingham's major club.
Quote from: aftab235 on November 25, 2011, 05:19:30 PMQuote from: Simba on November 24, 2011, 01:50:53 PMFaulkner will never have an easier interview. Pity there weren't a few difficult questions. Faulkner was fed and then endorsed. Hardly investigative reporting was it. Very poor, but BRMB has it's audience of course.and Tom Ross wants to be "respected " by the Club hierarchy so he protects his credibility by sitting on the ineffective stool.What questions would you have asked?
Quote from: dave.woodhall on November 25, 2011, 05:20:45 PMQuote from: aftab235 on November 25, 2011, 05:19:30 PMQuote from: Simba on November 24, 2011, 01:50:53 PMFaulkner will never have an easier interview. Pity there weren't a few difficult questions. Faulkner was fed and then endorsed. Hardly investigative reporting was it. Very poor, but BRMB has it's audience of course.and Tom Ross wants to be "respected " by the Club hierarchy so he protects his credibility by sitting on the ineffective stool.What questions would you have asked?Something a bit more intrusive than "Paul me Tom I am a nice man don't forget me next time I ring you for some tickets for my family and friends" type of interview I have just heard.
In other words you don't know what you'd have asked, but you still want to complain about it.
Faulkner's damned whatever he said or says. He said we want to challenge for Europe this season so he's mocked. If he'd have said that that wasn't a goal, he'd have been criticised for lacking ambition. The interview wasn't meant to be Question Time. It was an interview done before a game, hardly an opportunity for Tom Ross to grill the bloke.