Quote from: John M'Zog on October 31, 2011, 02:08:10 PMWhat he's done/trying to do is get us to operate within our means. I think his initial investment was intended to secure a top 4 place and therefore mean we could operate 'within our means' at a level like he subsidised for the first 3-4 years of his tenure, but that didn't happen. He is, but not as a result of a cleverly thought out strategy, but instead as an emergency measure to try and undo the damage of completely losing control of finances. It's not like he'd have sanctioned Beye's contract thinking, "well, if we don't get top 4 I'll cut back a bit next year". Basically he let O'Neill spend more or less what he liked and now we're paying for it.
What he's done/trying to do is get us to operate within our means. I think his initial investment was intended to secure a top 4 place and therefore mean we could operate 'within our means' at a level like he subsidised for the first 3-4 years of his tenure, but that didn't happen.
Quote from: Risso on October 31, 2011, 02:13:21 PMQuote from: John M'Zog on October 31, 2011, 02:08:10 PMWhat he's done/trying to do is get us to operate within our means. I think his initial investment was intended to secure a top 4 place and therefore mean we could operate 'within our means' at a level like he subsidised for the first 3-4 years of his tenure, but that didn't happen. He is, but not as a result of a cleverly thought out strategy, but instead as an emergency measure to try and undo the damage of completely losing control of finances. It's not like he'd have sanctioned Beye's contract thinking, "well, if we don't get top 4 I'll cut back a bit next year". Basically he let O'Neill spend more or less what he liked and now we're paying for it.That's the thing I don't get - the extent to which it really was "shit or bust", and so short termist.
Hopefully yes because they've been found out. When the General came out with just think what McLeish could do if he was backed (thank god he hasn't that much though, he's already proven to waste alot of money on Hutton and N'Zogbia) and thinking we would manage to get 4th oops my finger slipped 5th, then you just knew the General hasn't got a clue.
Quote from: Compass on October 31, 2011, 03:00:31 PMHopefully yes because they've been found out. When the General came out with just think what McLeish could do if he was backed (thank god he hasn't that much though, he's already proven to waste alot of money on Hutton and N'Zogbia) and thinking we would manage to get 4th oops my finger slipped 5th, then you just knew the General hasn't got a clue. I've got a lot of time for the General, and he was always in a difficult position fielding questions like that, but I had to say, the above statements really did make me wonder whether they understand the PL at all.
Look at the extend to which the spending brakes have been slammed on - we spent almost the entirety of last season around the relegation zone, and have since pruned the squad even more.That's pretty much "have a go and if it doesn't work out, we'll have to give up entirely".You're right about Man City, but it's not as if our ambitions have gone from being top four to top five.They've gone almost overnight to "a top half finish would be excellent". And that is the kind of thing the likes of Albion or Fulham would aspire to.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on October 31, 2011, 03:02:45 PMQuote from: Compass on October 31, 2011, 03:00:31 PMHopefully yes because they've been found out. When the General came out with just think what McLeish could do if he was backed (thank god he hasn't that much though, he's already proven to waste alot of money on Hutton and N'Zogbia) and thinking we would manage to get 4th oops my finger slipped 5th, then you just knew the General hasn't got a clue. I've got a lot of time for the General, and he was always in a difficult position fielding questions like that, but I had to say, the above statements really did make me wonder whether they understand the PL at all.It was the 'imagine what he could if backed' bit that I don;t understand. Why say it if hes not going to be backed? I see a number of possibilities:-1. The General thought he would be, but was wrong/out of the loop.2. They intended to, but something changed.3. He was lying to us.4. The General is an idiot.Now, I don't believe 4 and 3 is counter-productive, so that leaves 1 or 2. I can believe, especially in the current financial climate, things would change, but in that short a space of time? I can only assume he spoke out of turn and that might be part of the reason he has withdrawn from boards like this.
The Jan before that saw the comments from MON about selling before buying. So I guess it was somethime after summer 2009 when Randy revised his strategy.
Quote from: John M'Zog on October 31, 2011, 04:25:17 PMThe Jan before that saw the comments from MON about selling before buying. So I guess it was somethime after summer 2009 when Randy revised his strategy. I think it was the General that said MON had gone over budget in the summer of 2009 with the signing of Warnock. MON was just a spoiled child with those comments and I guess the writing was on the wall thereafter.
Randy and McLeish have had one transfer window.