collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2024 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Footy-Vill
[Today at 05:32:19 PM]


FFP by pablo_picasso
[Today at 05:31:28 PM]


Robin Olsen by AV84
[Today at 05:29:05 PM]


Season Tickets - 2023/24 by Lastfootstamper
[Today at 05:28:11 PM]


Champions League Contention by Footy-Vill
[Today at 05:27:35 PM]


Aston Villa 2 Chelsea 2 Post Match Heart Massage. by astonvilla82
[Today at 05:25:54 PM]


Joe Gauci - Signed by Footy-Vill
[Today at 05:25:04 PM]


Tim Iroegbunam by ChicagoLion
[Today at 05:22:42 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?  (Read 13673 times)

Offline TimTheVillain

  • Member
  • Posts: 4447
  • Location: Location
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2011, 05:38:23 PM »
To me it seems, after a period of great optimism, we're now about in the same state.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 58
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #16 on: September 21, 2011, 05:59:41 PM »
Lets not totally castigate doug, we did finish runner up twice and win a couple of cup finals under his stewardship along of course with some very low points too.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61599
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #17 on: September 21, 2011, 06:02:10 PM »
Ashton, I think O'Neill only took the job because he knew Lerner was taking over and he had cash to spend. I don't reckon he would have took the job if the previous regime was carrying on running the club.

Agree with you that Old Deadly would never have appointed McLeish and no matter what anyone thought of Doug, his love for the club was never in doubt.

Turner, McNeill, Blues, Wolves.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 58
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #18 on: September 21, 2011, 06:06:33 PM »
Ashton, I think O'Neill only took the job because he knew Lerner was taking over and he had cash to spend. I don't reckon he would have took the job if the previous regime was carrying on running the club.

Agree with you that Old Deadly would never have appointed McLeish and no matter what anyone thought of Doug, his love for the club was never in doubt.

Turner, McNeill, Blues, Wolves.


Taylor, atkinson , little , villa , -balances out in the end , he did good and bad during his time , as  has randy.

Offline garyshawsknee

  • Member
  • Posts: 5899
  • Location: Hove via Brighton, via Luton
  • GM : 03.06.2020
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #19 on: September 21, 2011, 06:06:57 PM »
Ashton, I think O'Neill only took the job because he knew Lerner was taking over and he had cash to spend. I don't reckon he would have took the job if the previous regime was carrying on running the club.

Agree with you that Old Deadly would never have appointed McLeish and no matter what anyone thought of Doug, his love for the club was never in doubt.

Turner, McNeill, Blues, Wolves.

...we didn't start the fire...

Offline 5ft811st2 Durham

  • Member
  • Posts: 579
    • Durham
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2011, 06:08:22 PM »
Ashton, I think O'Neill only took the job because he knew Lerner was taking over and he had cash to spend. I don't reckon he would have took the job if the previous regime was carrying on running the club.

Agree with you that Old Deadly would never have appointed McLeish and no matter what anyone thought of Doug, his love for the club was never in doubt.

Turner, McNeill, Blues, Wolves.

Venglos, Gregory, O'Leary, Derby County

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35685
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 08.01.2025
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2011, 06:10:17 PM »
You would have to have been out of touch then and out of touch now to entertain such a thought.

Online kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 23205
  • Location: Back in Solihull
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #22 on: September 21, 2011, 06:14:01 PM »
Ashton, I think O'Neill only took the job because he knew Lerner was taking over and he had cash to spend. I don't reckon he would have took the job if the previous regime was carrying on running the club.

Agree with you that Old Deadly would never have appointed McLeish and no matter what anyone thought of Doug, his love for the club was never in doubt.

Turner, McNeill, Blues, Wolves.


Taylor, atkinson , little , villa , -balances out in the end , he did good and bad during his time , as  has randy.

Venglos, GT Mark II, Dolly.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61599
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #23 on: September 21, 2011, 06:16:18 PM »
Ashton, I think O'Neill only took the job because he knew Lerner was taking over and he had cash to spend. I don't reckon he would have took the job if the previous regime was carrying on running the club.

Agree with you that Old Deadly would never have appointed McLeish and no matter what anyone thought of Doug, his love for the club was never in doubt.

Turner, McNeill, Blues, Wolves.


Taylor, atkinson , little , villa , -balances out in the end , he did good and bad during his time , as  has randy.

Venglos, GT Mark II, Dolly.

I'd never criticise Doug for appointing Venglos - it was a gamble that didn't work, and in a lot of ways Dr Jo was ahead of his time. It also says a lot about the way football changes that when we appointed O'Leary he wasn't far behind O'Neill in the "How did THEY get HIM?" stakes. He was easily the best available candidate.

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 39127
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #24 on: September 21, 2011, 06:17:12 PM »
The worst thing since Lerner took over is how he's turned a certain group of our fans from hard nosed, never say die men to a bunch of screamish, spoiled, little girls.

Online Dave

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 42070
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 04.01.2024
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #25 on: September 21, 2011, 06:22:26 PM »
Maybe we need to bundle these all up into one uber-thread?
"Villa Fans Worried" has a bit of a ring to it.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 58
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #26 on: September 21, 2011, 06:23:31 PM »
Ashton, I think O'Neill only took the job because he knew Lerner was taking over and he had cash to spend. I don't reckon he would have took the job if the previous regime was carrying on running the club.

Agree with you that Old Deadly would never have appointed McLeish and no matter what anyone thought of Doug, his love for the club was never in doubt.

Turner, McNeill, Blues, Wolves.


Taylor, atkinson , little , villa , -balances out in the end , he did good and bad during his time , as  has randy.

Venglos, GT Mark II, Dolly.

I'd never criticise Doug for appointing Venglos - it was a gamble that didn't work, and in a lot of ways Dr Jo was ahead of his time. It also says a lot about the way football changes that when we appointed O'Leary he wasn't far behind O'Neill in the "How did THEY get HIM?" stakes. He was easily the best available candidate.

Agreed, o leary was the popular choice at the time and having took leeds to such heights had the credentials-Doug cant be blamed for appointing him.

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35685
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 08.01.2025
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #27 on: September 21, 2011, 06:29:03 PM »
Maybe we need to bundle these all up into one uber-thread?
"Villa Fans Worried" has a bit of a ring to it.

Drama Queens of the World Unite.

Online kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 23205
  • Location: Back in Solihull
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #28 on: September 21, 2011, 06:33:33 PM »
Ashton, I think O'Neill only took the job because he knew Lerner was taking over and he had cash to spend. I don't reckon he would have took the job if the previous regime was carrying on running the club.

Agree with you that Old Deadly would never have appointed McLeish and no matter what anyone thought of Doug, his love for the club was never in doubt.

Turner, McNeill, Blues, Wolves.


Taylor, atkinson , little , villa , -balances out in the end , he did good and bad during his time , as  has randy.

Venglos, GT Mark II, Dolly.

I'd never criticise Doug for appointing Venglos - it was a gamble that didn't work, and in a lot of ways Dr Jo was ahead of his time. It also says a lot about the way football changes that when we appointed O'Leary he wasn't far behind O'Neill in the "How did THEY get HIM?" stakes. He was easily the best available candidate.

And to think I thought we were about to agree on something for the first time in two years as well.

Online ez

  • Member
  • Posts: 9342
  • Location: Stratford on Avon
Re: Is the club in a worse state now than when Lerner took over?
« Reply #29 on: September 21, 2011, 07:28:53 PM »
Doubt we would ever have signed a player like Darren Bent under Doug. Can't think of anything else.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal