I'm sure Mrs Onuaha is a lovely lady and I hope she beats her illness but is receiving this email really worse than being diagnosed with cancer?
Random thought: She got this a while back, wisely decided to sit on it for a while, asked for something for her boy (cut price move away maybe?) and when rebuffed by Mr Cock decided to let those warriors of justice at News International hear about it.
It's pretty obvious that is what her motivation is, but then it doesn't excuse his vile behaviour.
Quote from: John M'Zog on September 06, 2011, 10:15:49 AMIt's pretty obvious that is what her motivation is, but then it doesn't excuse his vile behaviour. Hold on a moment, his version of events haven't been disproved yet.
Quote from: taylorsworkrate on September 06, 2011, 10:47:57 AMQuote from: John M'Zog on September 06, 2011, 10:15:49 AMIt's pretty obvious that is what her motivation is, but then it doesn't excuse his vile behaviour. Hold on a moment, his version of events haven't been disproved yet.If you're saying innocent until proven guilty then fair enough, but the bloke still has a masters in twatness.
Yes it's out of order and whoever wrote it is guilty of real poor taste.However, of those who are truly enraged by it, how many of you laugh at sickipedia or have enjoyed Gary Glitter style jokes? The comments were in poor taste but so is playing it out in the media.
Quote from: QBVILLA on September 06, 2011, 10:20:19 AMYes it's out of order and whoever wrote it is guilty of real poor taste.However, of those who are truly enraged by it, how many of you laugh at sickipedia or have enjoyed Gary Glitter style jokes? The comments were in poor taste but so is playing it out in the media.Sorry, but I don't agree with what you're getting at at all. Unless you have told sickipedia or Gary Glitter style jokes to, say, a victim of paedophilia then comparing the two situations is utterly pointless.As for this instance, I'm not sure he (even with his mega twattishness acknowledged) would be so callous as to send that to someone in an email. I'd be shocked if he did to be honest. If it is proven to have been sent by him, then he should be sacked, no question.
In The Sun Manchester City embarrassment Garry Cook is "fighting for his job" today over the email to Nedum Onuoha's mum, an email The Sun is still describing as "sent from his account".On this note The Mill would just like to suggest that we all remember that Garry is as much the victim here as anyone else. And also that perhaps some kind of government taskforce should be set up into this new kind of "hacking", a specially targeted kind of e-crime whereby hackers access your account, compose an email that is convincingly written in something that sounds like your own voice; and which is offensive – but not too offensive to give the game away; and then having bothered to go to the trouble of accessing your account send just one private message. Plus they're also clever enough to remember to make it look like an email sent in error to the wrong person.The cunning of these cyber criminals knows no bounds. They must have sat down and really thought very hard about how to make it look exactly like you'd sent the email yourself in error, having added the wrong person to the "send" field, in the middle of a private banter session with Brian Marwood. Amazing really. But of course there's no way that could have actually happened because Cook says he was "hacked" and The Mill feels sure a member of his private staff will be produced to admit that, yes indeed, they did hack his email and have now been brought to justice.