Would you have agent Ridgewell back

[Rudy Can't Fail]

Nice lad, honest pro, improved at the Rags but we simply don't need him. Anyway, we've just signed Edna as cover at left back, so I don't think we'll be seeing Agent Ridgewell returning to base.

[nigel]

I'd heard WBA were after him, so perhaps that's where he's off too

[Oscar Arce]

If we get him back then we are doomed and I can only see a relegation fight.
Surely not ?

[olaftab]

No he is rubbish and if we do it's goodnight Vienna!

[PaulTheVillan]

No. He probably isn't better than Warnock & is no where near as good as Clark & Cuellar.

[The Villan On The Wirral]

Is this thread serious ?

He`s shit,always been shit and always will be shit.We sold him cos he was shit,why the fuck would we take him back when we`re having a mass clear out of shit?

[garyfouroaks]

We sold him for a profit, thank you, job done,move on.

[Lambert and Payne]

No thanks, too many fouls pens and own goals. He's shit and there's a reason no ones claimed him

[gervilla]

To quote Miles Hunt " No,no,no,no,no,no,no,no,no,no,no,no,no"

[Damo70]

When we sold him I thought maybe we should have kept him as cover and he might come back with Blues to bite us on the bum. All he did was bite them on their bum. He did a decent job for them out of position at left back but the reason he was out of position in the first place was that he wasn't one of their best two centre halfs. To sum up, no!

[Californian Villain]

He's not as bad as Davies but jesus he's worth about 10 pens a season with his handballs, he's terrible. We sold him for a reason, Coming back would be a nightmare, there is only one player I'd have back and I wont mention his name

I think Dwight Yorke has retired.