collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Golf 2025 by Villa Lew
[August 24, 2025, 11:03:24 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Matt C
[August 24, 2025, 10:52:13 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by danno
[August 24, 2025, 10:45:24 PM]


Boubacar Kamara by stevo_st
[August 24, 2025, 10:38:18 PM]


GUESS THE CROWD R2: ASTON VILLA v Palace, Sunday 31st August! by Louzie0
[August 24, 2025, 10:30:39 PM]


Brentford vs Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by Ads
[August 24, 2025, 10:25:13 PM]


Amadou Onana by Beard82
[August 24, 2025, 09:45:06 PM]


Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by darren woolley
[August 24, 2025, 09:14:30 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Celtic are better than Villa...  (Read 17508 times)

Offline Fergal

  • Member
  • Posts: 20960
  • Location: worksop
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #30 on: July 23, 2011, 09:27:16 AM »
Hope he enjoys is stay at Celtic playing against one other team to decide the title.
Of course he will, he is just a shallow money grabbing slime ball like the rest of them.  Football does not matter anymore.

Offline pablopicasso_10

  • Member
  • Posts: 1355
  • Age: 46
  • Location: villa territory
    • studio eleventytwelve
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #31 on: July 23, 2011, 10:54:55 AM »
who?

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15175
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #32 on: July 23, 2011, 11:07:56 AM »
All I read was "Celtic are paying me more."

Offline sonlyme

  • Member
  • Posts: 349
  • Location: West Midlands
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #33 on: July 23, 2011, 04:37:27 PM »
Strangely I read - 'Celtic were the only club to make me an offer'.  Funny old world.

Online JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34380
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #34 on: July 23, 2011, 06:33:46 PM »
trophies in Scotland have the same value as chocolate coins really ...

Offline LeeS

  • Member
  • Posts: 4559
  • Location: Beckenham
  • GM : 12.01.2025
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #35 on: July 23, 2011, 07:03:58 PM »
trophies in Scotland have the same value as chocolate coins really ...

Nonsense. You cant eat the Scottish League Cup

Offline Mellin

  • Member
  • Posts: 2452
  • Age: 38
  • Location: Leicestershire
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #36 on: July 24, 2011, 01:55:53 AM »
You can if you deep fry it.

Offline Jim Shoes

  • Member
  • Posts: 133
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #37 on: July 24, 2011, 02:29:34 AM »
Haha, I had the pleasure ???? of watching Celtic against Perth Glory a few weeks back and I realise that it was a friendly game but the quality was absolute shite.

I really hoped to see a good game but neither team had any player who looked better than average and that included Shaun Maloney.

Yes of course Celtic will win trophies in a 2 team league and I mean them no disrespect but if that is the standard of their football then they wouldn't last 1 season in the EPL. 

Offline lichfield lion

  • Member
  • Posts: 59
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #38 on: July 25, 2011, 12:22:42 PM »
Feck me, applying that logic he'd choose Blues above Villa!!

Offline lordmcgrath5

  • Member
  • Posts: 871
  • Location: Glasgow
  • GM : June, 2013
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #39 on: July 25, 2011, 01:03:08 PM »

Yes of course Celtic will win trophies in a 2 team league and I mean them no disrespect but if that is the standard of their football then they wouldn't last 1 season in the EPL. 

No, they probably wouldn't. But they'd immediately have an increase in revenues of 30 million plus per season given the differences in TV money north and south of the border. So, like Rangers, they would almost inevitably gradually narrow the gap after a few seasons. At the moment, the only way either of them can make any serious money is via a prolonged run in the Champions League.

Offline UsualSuspect

  • Member
  • Posts: 1571
  • Location: Deep Undercover In Old Warley....
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #40 on: July 25, 2011, 01:59:13 PM »
celtic and rangers would both struggle to stay in our league- bigger than villa yes but better no way.

Lets not forget how Celtic's crowds dropped by over 20K

Wankers

Offline TaxDodger

  • Member
  • Posts: 4125
  • Location: Aberystwyth/Nottingham
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #41 on: July 25, 2011, 02:14:35 PM »
I doubt Celtic are better than Pelsall Villa.

Offline Salsa Party Animal

  • Member
  • Posts: 2144
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Trinity Road Lower Stand or Dance-floor or Bedroom.
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/Salsapartyanimal
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #42 on: July 25, 2011, 02:18:23 PM »
Look like he have not read Aston Villa history book.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15664
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #43 on: July 25, 2011, 02:25:00 PM »
celtic and rangers would both struggle to stay in our league- bigger than villa yes but better no way.

Lets not forget how Celtic's crowds dropped by over 20K

Wankers

Once Celtic and Rangers started to receive Premier League cash they wouldn't struggle to stay in the PL at all.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 60
Re: Celtic are better than Villa...
« Reply #44 on: July 26, 2011, 07:53:34 AM »
celtic and rangers would both struggle to stay in our league- bigger than villa yes but better no way.

Lets not forget how Celtic's crowds dropped by over 20K

Wankers

Once Celtic and Rangers started to receive Premier League cash they wouldn't struggle to stay in the PL at all.

im talking about here and now- the celtic and rangers teams would both be in the lower reaches of the premiership and struggle to avoid relegation.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal