Wasn't aimed at you in particular. Just point out the large contradictions in this thread."We hushed it up because we don't want anyone to know we paid up the full £5.4m they wanted - what a disgrace!""We paid £3m - what a disgrace!"
Quote from: Villadawg on July 12, 2011, 02:16:13 PMQuote from: Lee on July 12, 2011, 01:46:02 PMI know that they have made the appointment and we have to carry on for the greater good, but I would like just one, just one ditty of the logic that they used to even contemplate employing him in the first place. As Spock would say "it's illogical captain" Ferguson's comments on the appointment are the only logical explanation I have seen, albeit with obviously worrying implications for our ambition. "At Rangers, for instance, by the time Alex took over, they weren't spending the kind of money which they had done previously, so Alex did a great job there. He managed to unite a unit there and do very well. In all his jobs he's had to deal with that kind of situation of making do with what you have and making the best of it and that's a quality that. He's got the experience now of doing all of these things and Aston Villa will represent the same type of challenge."Blimey, hadn't seen that before. Makes grim reading.
Quote from: Lee on July 12, 2011, 01:46:02 PMI know that they have made the appointment and we have to carry on for the greater good, but I would like just one, just one ditty of the logic that they used to even contemplate employing him in the first place. As Spock would say "it's illogical captain" Ferguson's comments on the appointment are the only logical explanation I have seen, albeit with obviously worrying implications for our ambition. "At Rangers, for instance, by the time Alex took over, they weren't spending the kind of money which they had done previously, so Alex did a great job there. He managed to unite a unit there and do very well. In all his jobs he's had to deal with that kind of situation of making do with what you have and making the best of it and that's a quality that. He's got the experience now of doing all of these things and Aston Villa will represent the same type of challenge."
I know that they have made the appointment and we have to carry on for the greater good, but I would like just one, just one ditty of the logic that they used to even contemplate employing him in the first place. As Spock would say "it's illogical captain"
Quote from: John M on July 12, 2011, 02:50:24 PMWasn't aimed at you in particular. Just point out the large contradictions in this thread."We hushed it up because we don't want anyone to know we paid up the full £5.4m they wanted - what a disgrace!""We paid £3m - what a disgrace!"Paying £XM wouldn't have been a disgrace if we'd tapped up somebody really good. To do it for McLeish is I think what has riled a lot of people.
Quote from: Mazrim on July 12, 2011, 02:48:29 PMQuote from: hilts_coolerking on July 12, 2011, 02:24:04 PMQuote from: Mazrim on July 12, 2011, 02:08:51 PMIf Blose had got what they wanted they would be bleating about it in the press about 2.6 seconds after recieving the money.Not if we asked, as part of the settlement, for it to remain undisclosed.But if they got they wanted, or in their view, entitled to, why would they accept any conditions?It was a compromise. McLeish drops his claims, they drop theirs, some sort of fee is involved. Likely nobody will ever know the details and who came off best if at all and I very much doubt the Telegraph know either.Villa never release any financial details they dont have to, even when there's no harm in it. Par for the course.Of course, we should never have got involved in this to begin with.because that was a condition for us agreeing to give them what they wanted without dispute? Regardless of the merits of the case, we could have made it a drawn out affair as we did with O'Neill.
Quote from: hilts_coolerking on July 12, 2011, 02:24:04 PMQuote from: Mazrim on July 12, 2011, 02:08:51 PMIf Blose had got what they wanted they would be bleating about it in the press about 2.6 seconds after recieving the money.Not if we asked, as part of the settlement, for it to remain undisclosed.But if they got they wanted, or in their view, entitled to, why would they accept any conditions?It was a compromise. McLeish drops his claims, they drop theirs, some sort of fee is involved. Likely nobody will ever know the details and who came off best if at all and I very much doubt the Telegraph know either.Villa never release any financial details they dont have to, even when there's no harm in it. Par for the course.Of course, we should never have got involved in this to begin with.
Quote from: Mazrim on July 12, 2011, 02:08:51 PMIf Blose had got what they wanted they would be bleating about it in the press about 2.6 seconds after recieving the money.Not if we asked, as part of the settlement, for it to remain undisclosed.
If Blose had got what they wanted they would be bleating about it in the press about 2.6 seconds after recieving the money.
£3m for him and the others according to the Torygraph.
Quote from: Chris Smith on July 12, 2011, 09:35:24 AM£3m for him and the others according to the Torygraph.Compares with paying about £20 for a kebab
Quote from: taylorsworkrate on July 12, 2011, 03:53:35 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on July 12, 2011, 09:35:24 AM£3m for him and the others according to the Torygraph.Compares with paying about £20 for a kebabYou've been to London then?
True enough. Dublin is the biggest piss take city I have ever been to in terms of stinging foreign eejits.
Quote from: Mazrim on July 12, 2011, 04:05:19 PMTrue enough. Dublin is the biggest piss take city I have ever been to in terms of stinging foreign eejits.I'm Irish, although with a quasi-thick Brumie accent, so it's not just the foreigners they're after!
I think that the board's stipulations in terms of what they wanted from the manager led to a number of better candidates either being ruled out or ruling themselves out. With time pressing and the field thinning, I think the board panicked, hence tapping up McLeish.