Fair play to him. He's gone for genuine 'play at the highest level/win things' reasons rather than for wallet-padding and I think he'll become a top quality player under Ferguson's guidance. I don't begrudge him his move at all - he's always given 100% and despite his idiosyncrasies over the last couple of years he was the one player who gave a real buzz when he was on the ball. Think we'll miss him big-time.
We will miss him though!
Quote from: achilles on June 10, 2011, 06:09:13 PMWe will miss him though!Hugely. He is a work horse, just like Milner was. Both were inspired signings from the oft-derided Mr. O'Neill.
i have just asked a question to the general about this.Ashley going is a given, I dont think anyone on here would have a go at the board about it - I think we all know the situation. But it being done when (from the outside) we haven't ran this past our new manager seems worrying. 2nd year running we have sold (and last year we bought) players without the input of a manager.To me, that tells an incoming manager he has no say in the incomings and outgoings. Now, I have no issue with Faulkner arranging contracts, but selecting players is a managers job.I don't think it would have made any difference and I am certain Young would still go, but I just think it should be at the managers say so.(but, then again, maybe we do know who the manager will be and it has already been cleared through them - who knows)
Quote from: Holtenderinthesky on June 10, 2011, 06:16:30 PMQuote from: achilles on June 10, 2011, 06:09:13 PMWe will miss him though!Hugely. He is a work horse, just like Milner was. Both were inspired signings from the oft-derided Mr. O'Neill.