That two point difference between the two managers first seasons is quite interesting - it's not much, is it?
Quote from: citizenDJ on May 22, 2011, 08:33:04 PMThat two point difference between the two managers first seasons is quite interesting - it's not much, is it? Well actually there is. Not a MON fan myself BUT he took a shambles of a team and got 50 points. Houllier took a near CL team and gave us a miserable season. In short O'Neill over delivered in his first season Houllier has under delivered by keeping us in relegation mire in his first season up to the last but one game.A big difference.
bet we wont be first match on MOTD tonight, bias bloody BBC !
Looked like GH was right all along - 7th to 12th.
How the fcuk have we finished 9th.Imagine if we hadn't been absolutely crap for most of the season.I'm not gonna get carried away what with our last 2 results but seriously how do you explain such ineptitude for most of the season when we just picked up 6 points from the 2 games I expected nothing from.I'm ending the season utterly confused.
The team was a shambles well before MON left. If the form of the last three months of MON's reign had continued into this season we would have been relegated before West Ham (and Blues would have stayed up). MON was a busted flush, and GH probably had just as much of a mess to sort out as MON did when he took over.
How the fcuk have we finished 9th.
Quote from: gervilla on May 22, 2011, 08:47:12 PMHow the fcuk have we finished 9th.By being the ninth best team, in the league. The table doesn't lie, as we've been told all season.