http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Martin-Lipton-s-Lunchtime-Read-Ham-fisted-Avram-Grant-sacking-tells-you-all-you-need-to-know-about-West-Ham-s-David-Sullivan-David-Gold-and-Karren-Brady-article736936.htmlSums them up perfectly
Quote from: UsualSuspect on May 17, 2011, 09:16:46 AMhttp://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Martin-Lipton-s-Lunchtime-Read-Ham-fisted-Avram-Grant-sacking-tells-you-all-you-need-to-know-about-West-Ham-s-David-Sullivan-David-Gold-and-Karren-Brady-article736936.htmlSums them up perfectlyAs was said when they went there - they got away with a lot at Small Heath because the local press were in thrall to them fancy London folk, but a lot of national writers are 'Ammers and they're not 'Appy.
Still, Gold and Sullivan treated him badly. They should never have given the man a 4 year contract, which might have enabled them to sack him after the 5-0 humiliation at Newcastle in November instead of waiting to invoke the relegation clause that it now seems clear is in his contract.
O'Neill left you lot because of lack of cash to spend (apparently), so why would he come to us?
All Gold and Sullivan want is the new stadium, so they can sell the old one and make millions from property development for their own pockets. Once done, they'll look for another owner for the club.
Quote from: Small Rodent on May 17, 2011, 01:39:19 PMAll Gold and Sullivan want is the new stadium, so they can sell the old one and make millions from property development for their own pockets. Once done, they'll look for another owner for the club.It's easy to say with hindsight but moving from Blues, when their council built super stadium failed to appear after years of trying, to go to a club and their first job was to announce that moving to a new stadium was their goal was spooky. It's like they hadn't left the Blues. LIke you say, it's their modus operandi and I can't help wondering why and what's in it for them?