Quote from: Rip Van Bentfletch on May 04, 2011, 10:21:44 AMBounty's have dissected coconut in them.I absolutely love Bounty's. Do they still make Bounty ice cream bars back home? Don't get them here. Bastard Canadian government.
Bounty's have dissected coconut in them.
Quote from: olneythebently on May 04, 2011, 09:25:17 AMQuote from: Rip Van Bentfletch on May 04, 2011, 09:03:07 AMQuote from: Villadawg on May 03, 2011, 09:55:04 PMQuote from: TheBentman on May 03, 2011, 06:53:32 PMThe thing that gets me in this is the effect Houllier's illness has had. Flash back to the game before that and we had started to pick up and were getting points. People were much more positive about Houllier due to that run as we were all but safe.I really do think had his illness not happened we might have beat Stoke and West Brom and would probably not be calling for him to be sacked.Regardless of results, a man who has had a second dissected aorta should not be under the pressure of Premier League management.VD is spot on with this.It defies all reasoning for him to carry on.Remember that he's carrying this problem at the age of 63.I didn't think his problem had anything to do with stress though. Just something that could happen to him at anytime. I'm not a doctor, as you might have guessed.Hypertension is the main cause of a dissected aorta. Stress = hypertension
Quote from: Rip Van Bentfletch on May 04, 2011, 09:03:07 AMQuote from: Villadawg on May 03, 2011, 09:55:04 PMQuote from: TheBentman on May 03, 2011, 06:53:32 PMThe thing that gets me in this is the effect Houllier's illness has had. Flash back to the game before that and we had started to pick up and were getting points. People were much more positive about Houllier due to that run as we were all but safe.I really do think had his illness not happened we might have beat Stoke and West Brom and would probably not be calling for him to be sacked.Regardless of results, a man who has had a second dissected aorta should not be under the pressure of Premier League management.VD is spot on with this.It defies all reasoning for him to carry on.Remember that he's carrying this problem at the age of 63.I didn't think his problem had anything to do with stress though. Just something that could happen to him at anytime. I'm not a doctor, as you might have guessed.
Quote from: Villadawg on May 03, 2011, 09:55:04 PMQuote from: TheBentman on May 03, 2011, 06:53:32 PMThe thing that gets me in this is the effect Houllier's illness has had. Flash back to the game before that and we had started to pick up and were getting points. People were much more positive about Houllier due to that run as we were all but safe.I really do think had his illness not happened we might have beat Stoke and West Brom and would probably not be calling for him to be sacked.Regardless of results, a man who has had a second dissected aorta should not be under the pressure of Premier League management.VD is spot on with this.It defies all reasoning for him to carry on.Remember that he's carrying this problem at the age of 63.
Quote from: TheBentman on May 03, 2011, 06:53:32 PMThe thing that gets me in this is the effect Houllier's illness has had. Flash back to the game before that and we had started to pick up and were getting points. People were much more positive about Houllier due to that run as we were all but safe.I really do think had his illness not happened we might have beat Stoke and West Brom and would probably not be calling for him to be sacked.Regardless of results, a man who has had a second dissected aorta should not be under the pressure of Premier League management.
The thing that gets me in this is the effect Houllier's illness has had. Flash back to the game before that and we had started to pick up and were getting points. People were much more positive about Houllier due to that run as we were all but safe.I really do think had his illness not happened we might have beat Stoke and West Brom and would probably not be calling for him to be sacked.
Quote from: toronto villa on May 04, 2011, 12:09:30 PMQuote from: Rip Van Bentfletch on May 04, 2011, 10:21:44 AMBounty's have dissected coconut in them.I absolutely love Bounty's. Do they still make Bounty ice cream bars back home? Don't get them here. Bastard Canadian government.Still do 'em.I'd happily kill for a dark chocolate Bounty.
I suppose the difference is the role a Director of Football has compared to a manager.If Houllier leaves in the summer, Gary Mac would go with him and Sid's role may change or disappear, plus the goalie coach, what Graham was proposing was that the D of F oversaw everything, and then if there was a change in the Head Coach it wouldn't leave the carnage we had when O'Neill left taking all his staff with him, if Houllier and his team leave in the summer we would have to start again.In the current set up Houllier is answerable to everything on the football side, whereas the D of F is almost a job for life and the Head Coach is responsible for the results on the pitch, the only major upheaval you have then is if you decide the D of F is not up to scratch.
Oh yes, I realise that. I just meant that the board seemed to have listened 100% to GT in terms of the personnel involved.What's clear is that some poor choices have been made. It's all getting a bit messy. We could kind of have the right sort of structure in place if GH's role is altered, but we still need that manager type. I don't think Kevin Mac would have been right, and Gary Mac definitely isn't.
Quote from: Merv on May 04, 2011, 12:31:31 PMOh yes, I realise that. I just meant that the board seemed to have listened 100% to GT in terms of the personnel involved.What's clear is that some poor choices have been made. It's all getting a bit messy. We could kind of have the right sort of structure in place if GH's role is altered, but we still need that manager type. I don't think Kevin Mac would have been right, and Gary Mac definitely isn't.I think appointing GH as manager instead of D of F is like buying Kyle Walker and playing him left back, right person, wrong position.Personally I'd get rid of Houllier and McAllister and start afresh, as it's clear to me that neither of them are up to the job, and more importanly they just "don't get Villa".Appointing the right person in the first place is obviously the key, whether we've got the people at the club to do that is debateable.We need to be ruthless and make an early decision, I certainly trust RL to do it with a bit of class as he has done in the last 5 years.
The Bounty Hunters, they came in search of Paradise...
My biggest concern is going for people who are out of work only. Firstly, it limits your options and secondly, there may be a very valid reason why they're not presently employed.
Quote from: toronto villa on May 04, 2011, 12:09:30 PMQuote from: Rip Van Bentfletch on May 04, 2011, 10:21:44 AMBounty's have dissected coconut in them.I absolutely love Bounty's. Do they still make Bounty ice cream bars back home? Don't get them here. Bastard Canadian government.That intrigued me, so I've just spent five dull minutes reading about Canadia's trade restriction on imports of ice-cream. Fascinating stuff. The fascists in Toronto also banned the use of mayonnaise on the various hot dog stalls around Toronto if my memory serves me well.
I've just stuck you one in the post aswell.