Quote from: sfx412 on May 03, 2011, 01:20:22 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on May 03, 2011, 01:07:50 PMQuote from: clampy on May 03, 2011, 12:54:35 PMWhat's annoyed me about GH and GMac is that just as you thik they're starting to make some kind of progress, they always make an almighty fuck up. Man City in the cup was the main one and Saturday's bizarre sub was another. Personally, as harsh as it would be, if we get 3 points on Saturday, i'd let them both go straight after the game and put Sid in charge for the last two games.While a clean break has some appeal, sacking a bloke while he is off sick would be a pretty shit thing to do. Clearly some big decisions need to be made this summer but it can wait a month.Quite right Chris it is a very shitty thing to do, nearly as bad as running away from a club as the season starts but these things happen.However, sometimes they need doing in, of course, the most sympathetic way possible. Sometimes hard decisions have to be made for the overall good, and starting a fresh with plenty of time to do so is what we need above anything else, now.That you think a bloke walking out of his job after a row is worse than sacking a seriously ill man says more about you than it does about those concerned.I expect Randy to show his customary integrity in how he deals with this situation.
Quote from: Chris Smith on May 03, 2011, 01:07:50 PMQuote from: clampy on May 03, 2011, 12:54:35 PMWhat's annoyed me about GH and GMac is that just as you thik they're starting to make some kind of progress, they always make an almighty fuck up. Man City in the cup was the main one and Saturday's bizarre sub was another. Personally, as harsh as it would be, if we get 3 points on Saturday, i'd let them both go straight after the game and put Sid in charge for the last two games.While a clean break has some appeal, sacking a bloke while he is off sick would be a pretty shit thing to do. Clearly some big decisions need to be made this summer but it can wait a month.Quite right Chris it is a very shitty thing to do, nearly as bad as running away from a club as the season starts but these things happen.However, sometimes they need doing in, of course, the most sympathetic way possible. Sometimes hard decisions have to be made for the overall good, and starting a fresh with plenty of time to do so is what we need above anything else, now.
Quote from: clampy on May 03, 2011, 12:54:35 PMWhat's annoyed me about GH and GMac is that just as you thik they're starting to make some kind of progress, they always make an almighty fuck up. Man City in the cup was the main one and Saturday's bizarre sub was another. Personally, as harsh as it would be, if we get 3 points on Saturday, i'd let them both go straight after the game and put Sid in charge for the last two games.While a clean break has some appeal, sacking a bloke while he is off sick would be a pretty shit thing to do. Clearly some big decisions need to be made this summer but it can wait a month.
What's annoyed me about GH and GMac is that just as you thik they're starting to make some kind of progress, they always make an almighty fuck up. Man City in the cup was the main one and Saturday's bizarre sub was another. Personally, as harsh as it would be, if we get 3 points on Saturday, i'd let them both go straight after the game and put Sid in charge for the last two games.
Quote from: ROBBO on May 03, 2011, 01:36:10 PMThe problem is this , if Houllier is given the all clear and resumes his duties then, in say October his problem reaccurs we are really left with looking for a new manager when all the decent options have already commited themselves.Then we should get a competent assistant in. Possibly someone with a long term chance of getting the top job.
The problem is this , if Houllier is given the all clear and resumes his duties then, in say October his problem reaccurs we are really left with looking for a new manager when all the decent options have already commited themselves.
Personally, as harsh as it would be, if we get 3 points on Saturday, i'd let them both go straight after the game and put Sid in charge for the last two games.
Quote from: TheBentman on May 03, 2011, 01:56:56 PMQuote from: ROBBO on May 03, 2011, 01:36:10 PMThe problem is this , if Houllier is given the all clear and resumes his duties then, in say October his problem reaccurs we are really left with looking for a new manager when all the decent options have already commited themselves.Then we should get a competent assistant in. Possibly someone with a long term chance of getting the top job.http://tinyurl.com/3trhxnn
Quote from: rodders on May 03, 2011, 03:06:19 PMQuote from: TheBentman on May 03, 2011, 01:56:56 PMQuote from: ROBBO on May 03, 2011, 01:36:10 PMThe problem is this , if Houllier is given the all clear and resumes his duties then, in say October his problem reaccurs we are really left with looking for a new manager when all the decent options have already commited themselves.Then we should get a competent assistant in. Possibly someone with a long term chance of getting the top job.http://tinyurl.com/3trhxnnOh god, the age old "suggest a good former player as a coach" argument. Laursen has said that's happy with TV media duties as it allow him to spend time with his family. Even if changed his mind, there's no evidence to date that suggests he'd be any good at it.
Quote from: clampy on May 03, 2011, 12:54:35 PMPersonally, as harsh as it would be, if we get 3 points on Saturday, i'd let them both go straight after the game and put Sid in charge for the last two games. I don't really see the point in that, to be honest.Barring a miracle, we are not going to be relegated, so there's not much reason to change the management team for the last two games of the season.It would also cloud the issue of the permanent succession if we were to have a caretaker in charge.
I hope Houllier sticks around in some capacity (although realistically I cant see it being as manager) but any new manager is going to have his work cut out for him to put it mildly.We seem to be sounding out targets already, nice and early, as Houllier is known to do. A new manager needs to give them his seal of approval and set his own targets. We could do with all the turmoil this summer will naturally bring whatever happens to be sorted by end of June at the latest so that we have a genuine chance to send a settled, reinvigorated and prepared squad into the new season and challenging back where we belong again.
Quote from: TheBentman on May 03, 2011, 01:56:56 PMQuote from: ROBBO on May 03, 2011, 01:36:10 PMThe problem is this , if Houllier is given the all clear and resumes his duties then, in say October his problem reaccurs we are really left with looking for a new manager when all the decent options have already commited themselves.Then we should get a competent assistant in. Possibly someone with a long term chance of getting the top job.That's a nice idea in theory, but I can't think of too many teams where you'd expect to see the no.2 taking over if the main man left.